Model comparison

GPT-5.6 Luna vs Qwen3.7 Max

Pricing, context window and real answers (August 2026)

GPT-5.6 Luna (OpenAI) and Qwen3.7 Max (Qwen), compared as you can actually call them on FastMetal. Both are served from the same OpenAI-compatible endpoint and API key; switching is a change to the model string.

Specs and pricing

openai logoGPT-5.6 Lunaqwen logoQwen3.7 Max
ProviderOpenAIQwen
Input (per 1M tokens)¥35.74¥263.58
Output (per 1M tokens)¥214.44¥790.75
Typical cost (1,000 in + 500 out tokens × 1,000 calls)¥143¥659
Context window1,050,000 tokens1,000,000 tokens
Release date7/9/20265/21/2026
Input modalitiesfile, image, texttext
Arena · overall#63 · ELO 1,452#27 · ELO 1,474
Arena · Japanese#36 · ELO 1,444Unranked
Arena · coding#69 · ELO 1,496#18 · ELO 1,525

Prices are FastMetal's yen rates before tax. Arena ranks are as of the latest leaderboard scrape.

Which should you pick?

  • On price, GPT-5.6 Luna: ¥214.44 per 1M output tokens, 73% less than Qwen3.7 Max.
  • On the Overall arena board, Qwen3.7 Max ranks higher (#27; GPT-5.6 Luna is #63).
  • On the Coding arena board, Qwen3.7 Max ranks higher (#18; GPT-5.6 Luna is #69).
  • For long documents, GPT-5.6 Luna: a 1,050,000-token context window against 1,000,000 for Qwen3.7 Max.
  • If in doubt, try both on the same key. Switching is a change to the model string, and each is billed at its own rate.

Real answers to the same prompts

Exactly what the FastMetal gateway returned, side by side. Not benchmark scores: actual output.

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'. Explain your reasoning step by step.

GPT-5.6 Luna

The word **“strawberry”** is spelled: **s – t – r – a – w – b – e – r – r – y** The letter **“r”** appears at positions **3, 8, and 9**. **Answer: 3**
3.0s120 output tokens

Qwen3.7 Max

To count the number of 'r's in the word "strawberry", let's break the word down letter by letter from left to right: 1. **s** - not an 'r' 2. **t** - not an 'r' 3. **r** - This is the **1st** 'r' 4. **a** - not an 'r' 5. **w** - not an 'r' 6. **b** - not an 'r' 7. **e** - not an 'r' 8. **r** - This is the **2nd** 'r' 9. **r** - This is the **3rd** 'r' 10. **y** - not an 'r' By examining each character individually, we can see that the letter 'r' appears in the 3rd, 8th, and 9th positions. Therefore, there are **3** 'r's in "strawberry".
15.1s842 output tokens

Debug This Error

I'm getting the following error in my Node.js application: TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map') at UserList (/app/components/UserList.js:12:25) at renderWithHooks (/app/node_modules/rea…

GPT-5.6 Luna

`users` is `undefined` when `UserList` renders, so calling `.map()` on it fails. `.map()` only exists on arrays. Common causes include: - The parent does not pass a `users` prop. - The prop name differs, such as `userList` instead of `users`. - Users are loaded asynchronously and are initially undefined. - The API response has a different shape, such as `{ data: [...] }`. ### Provide a default value ```jsx function UserList({ users = [] }) { return ( <ul> {users.map(user => ( <li key={user.id}>{user.name}</li> ))} </ul> ); } ``` The parent should pass an array: ```jsx <UserList users={users} /> ``` If the list comes from state, initialize it as an empty…
4.8s507 output tokens

Qwen3.7 Max

This error occurs because the `users` prop being passed to your `UserList` component is **`undefined`** at the time React tries to render it. JavaScript cannot call the `.map()` method on `undefined`, which throws the error. This usually happens for one of three reasons: 1. **Asynchronous Data Fetching:** The parent component is fetching `users` from an API. On the *initial render*, the data hasn't arrived yet, so the variable is `undefined`. 2. **Missing Prop:** The parent component forgot to pass the `users` prop (e.g., `<UserList />` instead of `<UserList users={myUsers} />`). 3. **Incorrect State Initialization:** The parent component initialized its state as `undefined` or `null` inste…
34.9s1851 output tokens

Code Review

Please review the following Python function and suggest improvements for readability, performance, and best practices: def get_data(url, retries=3): import requests import time for i in range(retries):…

GPT-5.6 Luna

### Main issues - Imports should be at module level, not inside the function. - A bare `except:` catches everything, including programming errors and `KeyboardInterrupt`. - The function sleeps even after the final failed attempt. - It retries all HTTP statuses, including permanent errors such as `404`. - `status_code == 200` excludes other successful `2xx` responses. - `if item["active"] == True` should generally be `if item.get("active") is True`. - A `requests.Session` can reuse connections and improve performance. - Returning `[]` for every failure makes it impossible to distinguish “no active items” from “request failed.” - Retries should generally use backoff rather than a fixed delay.…
23.3s1978 output tokens

Qwen3.7 Max

Here is a comprehensive review of your function, broken down by readability, performance, and best practices, followed by a refactored version. ### 1. Readability & Style (PEP 8) * **Imports inside the function:** Imports should generally be placed at the top of the file, not inside the function. This makes dependencies clear and avoids slight overhead on every function call. * **`item["active"] == True`:** In Python, explicitly comparing to `True` is discouraged (PEP 8). You should just use `if item.get("active"):`. Using `.get()` also prevents `KeyError` if the key is missing. * **Manual List Building:** The `for` loop with `.append()` can be replaced with a much cleaner and faster **list…
58.3s3301 output tokens

Compare on more prompts →

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, GPT-5.6 Luna or Qwen3.7 Max?
Per 1M output tokens, GPT-5.6 Luna is ¥214.44 and Qwen3.7 Max is ¥790.75 on FastMetal (yen, before tax), so GPT-5.6 Luna is cheaper.
How do the context windows of GPT-5.6 Luna and Qwen3.7 Max compare?
GPT-5.6 Luna takes 1,050,000 tokens; Qwen3.7 Max takes 1,000,000.
Which ranks higher, GPT-5.6 Luna or Qwen3.7 Max?
Qwen3.7 Max ranks higher on the public arena (GPT-5.6 Luna #36, Qwen3.7 Max #27). Ranks move as the leaderboard updates.
Can I use GPT-5.6 Luna and Qwen3.7 Max with the same API key?
Yes. On FastMetal's OpenAI-compatible endpoint, switch by passing "gpt-5.6-luna" or "qwen3.7-max" as the model. Each is billed at its own rate from the same prepaid balance.

Try both on one API key

Create an account and add credit to call GPT-5.6 Luna and Qwen3.7 Max from the browser chat and the API. No monthly fee.

More comparisons with GPT-5.6 Luna

More comparisons with Qwen3.7 Max