Model comparison

Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs GPT-5.6 Luna

Pricing, context window and real answers (September 2026)

Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Anthropic) and GPT-5.6 Luna (OpenAI), compared as you can actually call them on FastMetal. Both are served from the same OpenAI-compatible endpoint and API key; switching is a change to the model string.

Specs and pricing

anthropic logoClaude Sonnet 5.5openai logoGPT-5.6 Luna
ProviderAnthropicOpenAI
Input (per 1M tokens)¥357.4¥35.74
Output (per 1M tokens)¥1,787¥214.44
Typical cost (1,000 in + 500 out tokens × 1,000 calls)¥1,251¥143
Context window1,000,000 tokens1,050,000 tokens
Release date9/28/20267/9/2026
Input modalitiestext, image, filefile, image, text
Throughput (p50)—310 tokens/s (n=17)
Arena · overallUnranked#70 · ELO 1,454
Arena · JapaneseUnranked#49 · ELO 1,433
Arena · codingUnranked#73 · ELO 1,501

Prices are FastMetal's yen rates before tax.

Rankings: LMArena leaderboard dataset (lmarena-ai/leaderboard-dataset), CC BY 4.0, snapshot 2026-09-25; category names mapped and ratings rounded by FastMetal.

Which should you pick?

  • On price, GPT-5.6 Luna: ¥214.44 per 1M output tokens, 88% less than Claude Sonnet 5.5.
  • For long documents, GPT-5.6 Luna: a 1,050,000-token context window against 1,000,000 for Claude Sonnet 5.5.
  • If in doubt, try both on the same key. Switching is a change to the model string, and each is billed at its own rate.

Real answers to the same prompts

Exactly what the FastMetal gateway returned, side by side. Not benchmark scores: actual output.

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'. Explain your reasoning step by step.

Claude Sonnet 5.5

Let me go through the word letter by letter. **strawberry** | Position | Letter | |---|---| | 1 | s | | 2 | t | | 3 | **r** ← 1st | | 4 | a | | 5 | w | | 6 | b | | 7 | e | | 8 | **r** ← 2nd | | 9 | **r** ← 3rd | | 10 | y | **Step-by-step reasoning:** 1. I split the word into individual letters: s-t-r-a-w-b-e-r-r-y (10 letters total). 2. I checked each letter for 'r'. 3. The first 'r' is in position 3, in "str…". 4. The second and third 'r's are in positions 8 and 9, in the "…rry" ending. **Answer: There are 3 r's in "strawberry".** A common mistake is to see "berry" as having only one 'r' (or to treat the double-r as a single letter), which leads to the incorrect answer of 2.
3.1s332 output tokens

GPT-5.6 Luna

The word **“strawberry”** is spelled: **s – t – r – a – w – b – e – r – r – y** The letter **“r”** appears at positions **3, 8, and 9**. **Answer: 3**
3.0s120 output tokens

Debug This Error

I'm getting the following error in my Node.js application: TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map') at UserList (/app/components/UserList.js:12:25) at renderWithHooks (/app/node_modules/rea…

Claude Sonnet 5.5

## Cause `users` is `undefined` when the component renders, so `users.map(...)` throws. This happens when: 1. **The parent doesn't pass the prop**, or passes it under a different name (e.g. `<UserList data={x} />` or a typo like `user=`). 2. **The data loads asynchronously.** On the first render, the state or fetch result hasn't arrived yet. 3. **The value is wrong.** For example, the API returns `{ users: [...] }` and you passed the whole object, or you're reading a property that doesn't exist (`response.data.users` vs `response.users`). ## Fixes ### 1. Default value (simplest) ```jsx function UserList({ users = [] }) { return ( <ul> {users.map(user => <li key={user.id}>{use…
6.7s824 output tokens

GPT-5.6 Luna

`users` is `undefined` when `UserList` renders, so calling `.map()` on it fails. `.map()` only exists on arrays. Common causes include: - The parent does not pass a `users` prop. - The prop name differs, such as `userList` instead of `users`. - Users are loaded asynchronously and are initially undefined. - The API response has a different shape, such as `{ data: [...] }`. ### Provide a default value ```jsx function UserList({ users = [] }) { return ( <ul> {users.map(user => ( <li key={user.id}>{user.name}</li> ))} </ul> ); } ``` The parent should pass an array: ```jsx <UserList users={users} /> ``` If the list comes from state, initialize it as an empty…
4.8s507 output tokens

Code Review

Please review the following Python function and suggest improvements for readability, performance, and best practices: def get_data(url, retries=3): import requests import time for i in range(retries):…

Claude Sonnet 5.5

# Code Review ## Main Issues ### 1. Bare `except:` hides bugs (most important) It catches everything, including `KeyboardInterrupt` and `SystemExit`. It also wraps your parsing logic, so a missing `"active"` key (`KeyError`) or bad JSON is treated as a network failure, retried 3 times with sleeps, and then silently becomes `[]`. Catch only `requests.RequestException`, and keep parsing outside the `try`. ### 2. Silent failure Returning `[]` after all retries fails is indistinguishable from "the server returned no active items." Callers can't tell whether something went wrong. Raise an exception (or at least log) once retries are exhausted. ### 3. Retry logic - It sleeps after the final at…
20.9s3003 output tokens

GPT-5.6 Luna

### Main issues - Imports should be at module level, not inside the function. - A bare `except:` catches everything, including programming errors and `KeyboardInterrupt`. - The function sleeps even after the final failed attempt. - It retries all HTTP statuses, including permanent errors such as `404`. - `status_code == 200` excludes other successful `2xx` responses. - `if item["active"] == True` should generally be `if item.get("active") is True`. - A `requests.Session` can reuse connections and improve performance. - Returning `[]` for every failure makes it impossible to distinguish “no active items” from “request failed.” - Retries should generally use backoff rather than a fixed delay.…
23.3s1978 output tokens

Compare on more prompts →

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 5.5 or GPT-5.6 Luna?
Per 1M output tokens, Claude Sonnet 5.5 is ¥1,787 and GPT-5.6 Luna is ¥214.44 on FastMetal (yen, before tax), so GPT-5.6 Luna is cheaper.
How do the context windows of Claude Sonnet 5.5 and GPT-5.6 Luna compare?
Claude Sonnet 5.5 takes 1,000,000 tokens; GPT-5.6 Luna takes 1,050,000.
Can I use Claude Sonnet 5.5 and GPT-5.6 Luna with the same API key?
Yes. On FastMetal's OpenAI-compatible endpoint, switch by passing "anthropic-claude-sonnet-5-5" or "gpt-5.6-luna" as the model. Each is billed at its own rate from the same prepaid balance.

Try both on one API key

Create an account and add credit to call Claude Sonnet 5.5 and GPT-5.6 Luna from the browser chat and the API. No monthly fee.

More comparisons with Claude Sonnet 5.5

More comparisons with GPT-5.6 Luna