Model comparison

Claude Fable 5 vs Qwen3.7 Max

Pricing, context window and real answers (August 2026)

Claude Fable 5 (Anthropic) and Qwen3.7 Max (Qwen), compared as you can actually call them on FastMetal. Both are served from the same OpenAI-compatible endpoint and API key; switching is a change to the model string.

Specs and pricing

anthropic logoClaude Fable 5qwen logoQwen3.7 Max
ProviderAnthropicQwen
Input (per 1M tokens)¥1,787¥263.58
Output (per 1M tokens)¥8,935¥790.75
Typical cost (1,000 in + 500 out tokens × 1,000 calls)¥6,255¥659
Context window1,000,000 tokens1,000,000 tokens
Release date6/9/20265/21/2026
Input modalitiestext, image, filetext
Arena · overall#1 · ELO 1,508#21 · ELO 1,475
Arena · Japanese#1 · ELO 1,529Unranked
Arena · coding#2 · ELO 1,552#15 · ELO 1,526

Prices are FastMetal's yen rates before tax. Arena ranks are as of the latest leaderboard scrape.

Which should you pick?

  • On price, Qwen3.7 Max: ¥790.75 per 1M output tokens, 91% less than Claude Fable 5.
  • On the Overall arena board, Claude Fable 5 ranks higher (#1; Qwen3.7 Max is #21).
  • On the Coding arena board, Claude Fable 5 ranks higher (#2; Qwen3.7 Max is #15).
  • If in doubt, try both on the same key. Switching is a change to the model string, and each is billed at its own rate.

Real answers to the same prompts

Exactly what the FastMetal gateway returned, side by side. Not benchmark scores: actual output.

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'. Explain your reasoning step by step.

Claude Fable 5

# Counting 'r's in "strawberry" Let me spell out the word letter by letter and check each one: | Position | Letter | Is it 'r'? | |----------|--------|------------| | 1 | s | No | | 2 | t | No | | 3 | **r** | ✅ Yes (1st) | | 4 | a | No | | 5 | w | No | | 6 | b | No | | 7 | e | No | | 8 | **r** | ✅ Yes (2nd) | | 9 | **r** | ✅ Yes (3rd) | | 10 | y | No | ## Reasoning breakdown: - The word "strawberry" can be split into two parts: **straw** + **berry** - "straw" contains one 'r': st**r**aw - "berry" contains two 'r's: be**rr**y (a double-r) ## Answer: **3** There are **three 'r's** in "strawberry."
39.6s354 output tokens

Qwen3.7 Max

To count the number of 'r's in the word "strawberry", let's break the word down letter by letter from left to right: 1. **s** - not an 'r' 2. **t** - not an 'r' 3. **r** - This is the **1st** 'r' 4. **a** - not an 'r' 5. **w** - not an 'r' 6. **b** - not an 'r' 7. **e** - not an 'r' 8. **r** - This is the **2nd** 'r' 9. **r** - This is the **3rd** 'r' 10. **y** - not an 'r' By examining each character individually, we can see that the letter 'r' appears in the 3rd, 8th, and 9th positions. Therefore, there are **3** 'r's in "strawberry".
15.1s842 output tokens

Debug This Error

I'm getting the following error in my Node.js application: TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map') at UserList (/app/components/UserList.js:12:25) at renderWithHooks (/app/node_modules/rea…

Claude Fable 5

## Cause The error means that when `UserList` renders, the `users` prop is `undefined`, so calling `.map()` on it fails. This typically happens for one of these reasons: 1. **The parent isn't passing the prop** (or has a typo in the prop name): ```jsx <UserList /> // users is undefined <UserList user={users} /> // typo: "user" instead of "users" ``` 2. **Data is fetched asynchronously** — the component renders before the API call finishes, and the initial state is `undefined`: ```jsx const [users, setUsers] = useState(); // undefined initially! ``` ## Fixes **Option 1: Default parameter value** (quick fix) ```jsx function UserList({ users = [] }) { re…
51.3s686 output tokens

Qwen3.7 Max

This error occurs because the `users` prop being passed to your `UserList` component is **`undefined`** at the time React tries to render it. JavaScript cannot call the `.map()` method on `undefined`, which throws the error. This usually happens for one of three reasons: 1. **Asynchronous Data Fetching:** The parent component is fetching `users` from an API. On the *initial render*, the data hasn't arrived yet, so the variable is `undefined`. 2. **Missing Prop:** The parent component forgot to pass the `users` prop (e.g., `<UserList />` instead of `<UserList users={myUsers} />`). 3. **Incorrect State Initialization:** The parent component initialized its state as `undefined` or `null` inste…
34.9s1851 output tokens

Code Review

Please review the following Python function and suggest improvements for readability, performance, and best practices: def get_data(url, retries=3): import requests import time for i in range(retries):…

Claude Fable 5

# Code Review Your function works, but there are several issues worth addressing. Here's a breakdown by category: ## Issues Found ### 1. **Bare `except:` clause (critical)** This catches *everything*, including `KeyboardInterrupt`, `SystemExit`, and bugs like `KeyError` or `TypeError` in your own parsing code. You'll silently retry on programming errors and mask real problems. ### 2. **Imports inside the function** Imports belong at module level (PEP 8). Function-level imports add overhead on each call and hide dependencies. ### 3. **`== True` comparison** Use truthiness directly: `if item["active"]:` (PEP 8 explicitly recommends this). ### 4. **Silent failures** Returning `[]` on fail…
38.5s1528 output tokens

Qwen3.7 Max

Here is a comprehensive review of your function, broken down by readability, performance, and best practices, followed by a refactored version. ### 1. Readability & Style (PEP 8) * **Imports inside the function:** Imports should generally be placed at the top of the file, not inside the function. This makes dependencies clear and avoids slight overhead on every function call. * **`item["active"] == True`:** In Python, explicitly comparing to `True` is discouraged (PEP 8). You should just use `if item.get("active"):`. Using `.get()` also prevents `KeyError` if the key is missing. * **Manual List Building:** The `for` loop with `.append()` can be replaced with a much cleaner and faster **list…
58.3s3301 output tokens

Compare on more prompts →

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5 or Qwen3.7 Max?
Per 1M output tokens, Claude Fable 5 is ¥8,935 and Qwen3.7 Max is ¥790.75 on FastMetal (yen, before tax), so Qwen3.7 Max is cheaper.
How do the context windows of Claude Fable 5 and Qwen3.7 Max compare?
Claude Fable 5 takes 1,000,000 tokens; Qwen3.7 Max takes 1,000,000.
Which ranks higher, Claude Fable 5 or Qwen3.7 Max?
Claude Fable 5 ranks higher on the public arena (Claude Fable 5 #1, Qwen3.7 Max #21). Ranks move as the leaderboard updates.
Can I use Claude Fable 5 and Qwen3.7 Max with the same API key?
Yes. On FastMetal's OpenAI-compatible endpoint, switch by passing "anthropic-claude-fable-5" or "qwen3.7-max" as the model. Each is billed at its own rate from the same prepaid balance.

Try both on one API key

Create an account and add credit to call Claude Fable 5 and Qwen3.7 Max from the browser chat and the API. No monthly fee.

More comparisons with Claude Fable 5

More comparisons with Qwen3.7 Max