Model comparison

Claude Sonnet 5 vs GPT-5.6 Luna

Pricing, context window and real answers (August 2026)

Claude Sonnet 5 (Anthropic) and GPT-5.6 Luna (OpenAI), compared as you can actually call them on FastMetal. Both are served from the same OpenAI-compatible endpoint and API key; switching is a change to the model string.

Specs and pricing

anthropic logoClaude Sonnet 5openai logoGPT-5.6 Luna
ProviderAnthropicOpenAI
Input (per 1M tokens)¥357.4¥35.74
Output (per 1M tokens)¥1,787¥214.44
Typical cost (1,000 in + 500 out tokens × 1,000 calls)¥1,251¥143
Context window1,000,000 tokens1,050,000 tokens
Release date6/30/20267/9/2026
Input modalitiestext, image, filefile, image, text
Arena · overall#47 · ELO 1,461#63 · ELO 1,452
Arena · Japanese#33 · ELO 1,447#36 · ELO 1,444
Arena · coding#22 · ELO 1,522#69 · ELO 1,496

Prices are FastMetal's yen rates before tax. Arena ranks are as of the latest leaderboard scrape.

Which should you pick?

  • On price, GPT-5.6 Luna: ¥214.44 per 1M output tokens, 88% less than Claude Sonnet 5.
  • On the Overall arena board, Claude Sonnet 5 ranks higher (#47; GPT-5.6 Luna is #63).
  • On the Japanese arena board, Claude Sonnet 5 ranks higher (#33; GPT-5.6 Luna is #36).
  • On the Coding arena board, Claude Sonnet 5 ranks higher (#22; GPT-5.6 Luna is #69).
  • For long documents, GPT-5.6 Luna: a 1,050,000-token context window against 1,000,000 for Claude Sonnet 5.
  • If in doubt, try both on the same key. Switching is a change to the model string, and each is billed at its own rate.

Real answers to the same prompts

Exactly what the FastMetal gateway returned, side by side. Not benchmark scores: actual output.

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'. Explain your reasoning step by step.

Claude Sonnet 5

# Counting 'r's in "strawberry" **Step 1: Spell out the word letter by letter** s - t - r - a - w - b - e - r - r - y **Step 2: Number each letter position** | Position | Letter | |----------|--------| | 1 | s | | 2 | t | | 3 | **r** | | 4 | a | | 5 | w | | 6 | b | | 7 | e | | 8 | **r** | | 9 | **r** | | 10 | y | **Step 3: Identify and count the 'r's** - Position 3: **r** ✓ (1st r) - Position 8: **r** ✓ (2nd r) - Position 9: **r** ✓ (3rd r) **Answer: There are 3 r's in "strawberry"**
5.9s405 output tokens

GPT-5.6 Luna

The word **“strawberry”** is spelled: **s – t – r – a – w – b – e – r – r – y** The letter **“r”** appears at positions **3, 8, and 9**. **Answer: 3**
3.0s120 output tokens

Debug This Error

I'm getting the following error in my Node.js application: TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map') at UserList (/app/components/UserList.js:12:25) at renderWithHooks (/app/node_modules/rea…

Claude Sonnet 5

# Root Cause The `UserList` component receives `users` as a prop, but at the time it's rendered, `users` is `undefined` — not an empty array, but literally missing. When your code tries to call `.map()` on `undefined`, JavaScript throws that `TypeError`. This typically happens when: - The parent component hasn't fetched the data yet (e.g., an API call is still in progress) - The prop name doesn't match what's being passed down (typo) - The data source (API/state) genuinely returns `undefined` in some case # Fixes **1. Add a default prop value (quick fix)** ```jsx function UserList({ users = [] }) { return ( <ul> {users.map(user => <li key={user.id}>{user.name}</li>)} </u…
8.8s750 output tokens

GPT-5.6 Luna

`users` is `undefined` when `UserList` renders, so calling `.map()` on it fails. `.map()` only exists on arrays. Common causes include: - The parent does not pass a `users` prop. - The prop name differs, such as `userList` instead of `users`. - Users are loaded asynchronously and are initially undefined. - The API response has a different shape, such as `{ data: [...] }`. ### Provide a default value ```jsx function UserList({ users = [] }) { return ( <ul> {users.map(user => ( <li key={user.id}>{user.name}</li> ))} </ul> ); } ``` The parent should pass an array: ```jsx <UserList users={users} /> ``` If the list comes from state, initialize it as an empty…
4.8s507 output tokens

Code Review

Please review the following Python function and suggest improvements for readability, performance, and best practices: def get_data(url, retries=3): import requests import time for i in range(retries):…

Claude Sonnet 5

## Review of `get_data` Function Here's an improved version followed by an explanation of the changes: ```python import logging import time from typing import Any import requests logger = logging.getLogger(__name__) def get_data( url: str, retries: int = 3, timeout: float = 10.0, backoff_factor: float = 2.0, ) -> list[dict[str, Any]]: """ Fetch active items from the given URL. Args: url: The endpoint to fetch data from. retries: Number of attempts before giving up. timeout: Request timeout in seconds. backoff_factor: Multiplier for exponential backoff between retries. Returns: A list of dicts with "name" and "id"…
14.0s1299 output tokens

GPT-5.6 Luna

### Main issues - Imports should be at module level, not inside the function. - A bare `except:` catches everything, including programming errors and `KeyboardInterrupt`. - The function sleeps even after the final failed attempt. - It retries all HTTP statuses, including permanent errors such as `404`. - `status_code == 200` excludes other successful `2xx` responses. - `if item["active"] == True` should generally be `if item.get("active") is True`. - A `requests.Session` can reuse connections and improve performance. - Returning `[]` for every failure makes it impossible to distinguish “no active items” from “request failed.” - Retries should generally use backoff rather than a fixed delay.…
23.3s1978 output tokens

Compare on more prompts →

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 5 or GPT-5.6 Luna?
Per 1M output tokens, Claude Sonnet 5 is ¥1,787 and GPT-5.6 Luna is ¥214.44 on FastMetal (yen, before tax), so GPT-5.6 Luna is cheaper.
How do the context windows of Claude Sonnet 5 and GPT-5.6 Luna compare?
Claude Sonnet 5 takes 1,000,000 tokens; GPT-5.6 Luna takes 1,050,000.
Which ranks higher, Claude Sonnet 5 or GPT-5.6 Luna?
Claude Sonnet 5 ranks higher on the public arena (Claude Sonnet 5 #33, GPT-5.6 Luna #36). Ranks move as the leaderboard updates.
Can I use Claude Sonnet 5 and GPT-5.6 Luna with the same API key?
Yes. On FastMetal's OpenAI-compatible endpoint, switch by passing "anthropic-claude-sonnet-5" or "gpt-5.6-luna" as the model. Each is billed at its own rate from the same prepaid balance.

Try both on one API key

Create an account and add credit to call Claude Sonnet 5 and GPT-5.6 Luna from the browser chat and the API. No monthly fee.

More comparisons with Claude Sonnet 5

More comparisons with GPT-5.6 Luna