Model comparison

Claude Opus 5 vs Qwen3.7 Max

Pricing, context window and real answers (August 2026)

Claude Opus 5 (Anthropic) and Qwen3.7 Max (Qwen), compared as you can actually call them on FastMetal. Both are served from the same OpenAI-compatible endpoint and API key; switching is a change to the model string.

Specs and pricing

anthropic logoClaude Opus 5qwen logoQwen3.7 Max
ProviderAnthropicQwen
Input (per 1M tokens)¥893.5¥263.58
Output (per 1M tokens)¥4,467.5¥790.75
Typical cost (1,000 in + 500 out tokens × 1,000 calls)¥3,127¥659
Context window1,000,000 tokens1,000,000 tokens
Release date7/24/20265/21/2026
Input modalitiestext, image, filetext
Arena · overall#5 · ELO 1,495#21 · ELO 1,475
Arena · JapaneseUnrankedUnranked
Arena · coding#7 · ELO 1,535#15 · ELO 1,526

Prices are FastMetal's yen rates before tax. Arena ranks are as of the latest leaderboard scrape.

Which should you pick?

  • On price, Qwen3.7 Max: ¥790.75 per 1M output tokens, 82% less than Claude Opus 5.
  • On the Overall arena board, Claude Opus 5 ranks higher (#5; Qwen3.7 Max is #21).
  • On the Coding arena board, Claude Opus 5 ranks higher (#7; Qwen3.7 Max is #15).
  • If in doubt, try both on the same key. Switching is a change to the model string, and each is billed at its own rate.

Real answers to the same prompts

Exactly what the FastMetal gateway returned, side by side. Not benchmark scores: actual output.

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'. Explain your reasoning step by step.

Claude Opus 5

## Counting the 'r's in "strawberry" **Step 1: Break the word into individual letters** | Position | Letter | |----------|--------| | 1 | s | | 2 | t | | 3 | **r** | | 4 | a | | 5 | w | | 6 | b | | 7 | e | | 8 | **r** | | 9 | **r** | | 10 | y | **Step 2: Identify each occurrence of 'r'** - Position 3: the 'r' in the "str-" beginning - Position 8: the first 'r' in the "-rry" ending - Position 9: the second 'r' in the "-rry" ending **Step 3: Tally them up** 3 + 8 + 9 → that's **3 occurrences**. ## Answer: 3 The tricky part is that "strawberry" contains a *double* 'r' near the end ("berry"), which is easy to skim over as a single letter. Splitting the word into "straw" (1 'r') + "berry"…
7.1s466 output tokens

Qwen3.7 Max

To count the number of 'r's in the word "strawberry", let's break the word down letter by letter from left to right: 1. **s** - not an 'r' 2. **t** - not an 'r' 3. **r** - This is the **1st** 'r' 4. **a** - not an 'r' 5. **w** - not an 'r' 6. **b** - not an 'r' 7. **e** - not an 'r' 8. **r** - This is the **2nd** 'r' 9. **r** - This is the **3rd** 'r' 10. **y** - not an 'r' By examining each character individually, we can see that the letter 'r' appears in the 3rd, 8th, and 9th positions. Therefore, there are **3** 'r's in "strawberry".
15.1s842 output tokens

Debug This Error

I'm getting the following error in my Node.js application: TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map') at UserList (/app/components/UserList.js:12:25) at renderWithHooks (/app/node_modules/rea…

Claude Opus 5

## What's happening The error means `users` is `undefined` when `UserList` renders — so calling `.map()` on it throws. React isn't the problem; the prop simply isn't there yet (or ever). The three most common causes: 1. **The parent isn't passing the prop** (or passes it under a different name / typo): ```jsx <UserList /> // users is undefined <UserList user={data} /> // wrong name ``` 2. **The data is fetched asynchronously**, and the first render happens before it arrives: ```jsx const [users, setUsers] = useState(); // undefined on first render! useEffect(() => { fetch('/api/users').then(r => r.json()).then(setUsers); }, []); return <UserList user…
15.1s1191 output tokens

Qwen3.7 Max

This error occurs because the `users` prop being passed to your `UserList` component is **`undefined`** at the time React tries to render it. JavaScript cannot call the `.map()` method on `undefined`, which throws the error. This usually happens for one of three reasons: 1. **Asynchronous Data Fetching:** The parent component is fetching `users` from an API. On the *initial render*, the data hasn't arrived yet, so the variable is `undefined`. 2. **Missing Prop:** The parent component forgot to pass the `users` prop (e.g., `<UserList />` instead of `<UserList users={myUsers} />`). 3. **Incorrect State Initialization:** The parent component initialized its state as `undefined` or `null` inste…
34.9s1851 output tokens

Code Review

Please review the following Python function and suggest improvements for readability, performance, and best practices: def get_data(url, retries=3): import requests import time for i in range(retries):…

Claude Opus 5

# Code Review: `get_data` Overall, the function works for the happy path, but there are several issues worth addressing — the most serious being the bare `except`, the silent failure mode, and the conflation of two responsibilities (fetching and transforming). ## Critical Issues ### 1. Bare `except` swallows everything ```python except: time.sleep(2) ``` This catches `KeyboardInterrupt`, `SystemExit`, `MemoryError`, and — importantly — bugs in your own code. If `item["active"]` raises a `KeyError` because the API changed its schema, you'll retry three times and return `[]`, giving you no indication anything went wrong. Catch `requests.RequestException` instead (the base class for all…
34.7s2823 output tokens

Qwen3.7 Max

Here is a comprehensive review of your function, broken down by readability, performance, and best practices, followed by a refactored version. ### 1. Readability & Style (PEP 8) * **Imports inside the function:** Imports should generally be placed at the top of the file, not inside the function. This makes dependencies clear and avoids slight overhead on every function call. * **`item["active"] == True`:** In Python, explicitly comparing to `True` is discouraged (PEP 8). You should just use `if item.get("active"):`. Using `.get()` also prevents `KeyError` if the key is missing. * **Manual List Building:** The `for` loop with `.append()` can be replaced with a much cleaner and faster **list…
58.3s3301 output tokens

Compare on more prompts →

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 5 or Qwen3.7 Max?
Per 1M output tokens, Claude Opus 5 is ¥4,467.5 and Qwen3.7 Max is ¥790.75 on FastMetal (yen, before tax), so Qwen3.7 Max is cheaper.
How do the context windows of Claude Opus 5 and Qwen3.7 Max compare?
Claude Opus 5 takes 1,000,000 tokens; Qwen3.7 Max takes 1,000,000.
Which ranks higher, Claude Opus 5 or Qwen3.7 Max?
Claude Opus 5 ranks higher on the public arena (Claude Opus 5 #5, Qwen3.7 Max #21). Ranks move as the leaderboard updates.
Can I use Claude Opus 5 and Qwen3.7 Max with the same API key?
Yes. On FastMetal's OpenAI-compatible endpoint, switch by passing "anthropic-claude-opus-5" or "qwen3.7-max" as the model. Each is billed at its own rate from the same prepaid balance.

Try both on one API key

Create an account and add credit to call Claude Opus 5 and Qwen3.7 Max from the browser chat and the API. No monthly fee.

More comparisons with Claude Opus 5

More comparisons with Qwen3.7 Max