Kimi K3.1 Pro vs LLM-jp-3.1 8x13B instruct4
Pricing, context window and real answers (October 2026)
Kimi K3.1 Pro (Moonshot) and LLM-jp-3.1 8x13B instruct4 (LLM-jp), compared as you can actually call them on FastMetal. Both are served from the same OpenAI-compatible endpoint and API key; switching is a change to the model string.
Specs and pricing
 Kimi K3.1 Pro | LLM-jp-3.1 8x13B instruct4 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Moonshot | LLM-jp |
| Input (per 1M tokens) | $2.11 | $0.102 |
| Output (per 1M tokens) | $10.55 | $0.5035 |
| Typical cost (1,000 in + 500 out tokens × 1,000 calls) | $7.39 | $0.3537 |
| Context window | 1,048,576 tokens | 4,096 tokens |
| Release date | 10/23/2026 | 3/21/2026 |
| Input modalities | text, image, video | text |
| Throughput (p50) | — | 124 tokens/s (n=27) |
| Arena · overall | Unranked | Unranked |
| Arena · Japanese | Unranked | Unranked |
| Arena · coding | Unranked | Unranked |
Prices are FastMetal's rates, before tax.
Rankings: LMArena leaderboard dataset (lmarena-ai/leaderboard-dataset), CC BY 4.0, snapshot 2026-10-22; category names mapped and ratings rounded by FastMetal.
Which should you pick?
- On price, LLM-jp-3.1 8x13B instruct4: $0.5035 per 1M output tokens, 95% less than Kimi K3.1 Pro.
- For long documents, Kimi K3.1 Pro: a 1,048,576-token context window against 4,096 for LLM-jp-3.1 8x13B instruct4.
- If in doubt, try both on the same key. Switching is a change to the model string, and each is billed at its own rate.
Real answers to the same prompts
Exactly what the FastMetal gateway returned, side by side. Not benchmark scores: actual output.
Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'
Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'. Explain your reasoning step by step.
Kimi K3.1 Pro
There are **3** ‘r’s in **“strawberry.”**
1. Write out each letter: **s – t – r – a – w – b – e – r – r – y**
2. Locate the ‘r’s: positions **3, 8, and 9**.
3. Count them: **1 + 1 + 1 = 3**.
11.3s
LLM-jp-3.1 8x13B instruct4
To count the number of 'r's in the word 'strawberry', follow these steps:
1. Identify the word: The word we are examining is 'strawberry'.
2. Understand the task: We need to find and count all occurrences of the letter 'r' in this word.
3. Begin with the first letter: The first letter is 's', which is not 'r', so we move on to the next letter.
4. Proceed to the second letter: The second letter is 't', which is also not 'r', so we continue to the third letter.
5. Reach the third letter: The third letter is 'r'. We have found one 'r'.
6. Continue to the fourth letter: The fourth letter is 'a', which is not 'r', so we move on to the fifth letter.
7. Examine the fifth letter: The fifth letter i…
4.0s400 output tokens
Debug This Error
I'm getting the following error in my Node.js application: TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map') at UserList (/app/components/UserList.js:12:25) at renderWithHooks (/app/node_modules/rea…
Kimi K3.1 Pro
## What's causing the error
The error means `users` is `undefined` when the component renders, and you can't call `.map()` on `undefined`. The component itself is fine — the problem is that whatever renders `<UserList />` either isn't passing the prop, or is passing a value that isn't an array yet.
The most common cause is **async data fetching**: the parent renders `UserList` before the data has loaded.
```jsx
function App() {
const [users, setUsers] = useState(); // ❌ undefined on first render
useEffect(() => {
fetch('/api/users')
.then(res => res.json())
.then(setUsers);
}, []);
return <UserList users={users} />; // users is undefined here initially
}
```
On…
36.3s
LLM-jp-3.1 8x13B instruct4
The error TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map') suggests that the 'users' argument passed to the UserList component is undefined or does not have a 'map' method.
The cause of the problem may be that the users variable is not being passed correctly or is not defined in the parent component. Check the props being passed to the UserList component to ensure that they are defined and contain the expected data.
To fix the issue, you can add some error handling and debugging to your component. Try logging the users variable to the console to verify that it is not undefined:
```jsx
function UserList({ users }) {
console.log("Users:", users);
if (!users) {
return <…
3.0s279 output tokens
Code Review
Please review the following Python function and suggest improvements for readability, performance, and best practices: def get_data(url, retries=3): import requests import time for i in range(retries):…
Kimi K3.1 Pro
The timeout and bounded retry loop are good starting points. The biggest issue is that failures—and even programming errors—are silently converted into retries and then `[]`.
### Suggested improvements
- **Avoid bare `except:`**. It catches `KeyboardInterrupt`, `KeyError`, JSON/schema errors, and other bugs. Retry only expected transient network failures; let malformed responses fail visibly.
- **Use a deliberate retry policy**. Retrying `401`, `403`, or `404` usually wastes time. Retry only transient statuses, use exponential backoff, and avoid sleeping after the final attempt.
- **Do not use `[]` for both failure and no results**. Prefer raising the final exception so callers can disting…
560.2s
LLM-jp-3.1 8x13B instruct4
The provided Python function aims to get data from a URL using the requests library, filter out specific items based on their "active" field, and return the result. Here are some suggestions to improve readability, performance, and adherence to best practices:
1. Configure the linter (e.g., flake8 or pylint) to ensure code quality and enforce a consistent coding style.
2. Use type hints to improve readability and maintainability.
3. Use context managers (with statement) for handling requests:
4. Rewrite the function using a more functional programming style:
Here's the improved version of the function:
```python
import requests
import time
from typing import List, Dict, Any
def get_da…
3.9s406 output tokens
Frequently asked questions
- Which is cheaper, Kimi K3.1 Pro or LLM-jp-3.1 8x13B instruct4?
- Per 1M output tokens, Kimi K3.1 Pro is $10.55 and LLM-jp-3.1 8x13B instruct4 is $0.5035 on FastMetal (US dollars, before tax), so LLM-jp-3.1 8x13B instruct4 is cheaper.
- How do the context windows of Kimi K3.1 Pro and LLM-jp-3.1 8x13B instruct4 compare?
- Kimi K3.1 Pro takes 1,048,576 tokens; LLM-jp-3.1 8x13B instruct4 takes 4,096.
- Can I use Kimi K3.1 Pro and LLM-jp-3.1 8x13B instruct4 with the same API key?
- Yes. On FastMetal's OpenAI-compatible endpoint, switch by passing "kimi-k3.1-pro" or "llm-jp-3.1-8x13b-instruct4" as the model. Each is billed at its own rate from the same prepaid balance.
Try both on one API key
Create an account and add credit to call Kimi K3.1 Pro and LLM-jp-3.1 8x13B instruct4 from the browser chat and the API. No monthly fee.
More comparisons with Kimi K3.1 Pro
More comparisons with LLM-jp-3.1 8x13B instruct4
- LLM-jp-3.1 8x13B instruct4 vs Claude Opus 5
- LLM-jp-3.1 8x13B instruct4 vs Claude Sonnet 5
- LLM-jp-3.1 8x13B instruct4 vs Claude Sonnet 5.5
- LLM-jp-3.1 8x13B instruct4 vs Claude Fable 5.1
- LLM-jp-3.1 8x13B instruct4 vs Claude Fable 5
- LLM-jp-3.1 8x13B instruct4 vs Claude Opus 4.8
- LLM-jp-3.1 8x13B instruct4 details