Model comparison

Claude Fable 5 vs LLM-jp-3.1 8x13B instruct4

Pricing, context window and real answers (August 2026)

Claude Fable 5 (Anthropic) and LLM-jp-3.1 8x13B instruct4 (Llm Jp), compared as you can actually call them on FastMetal. Both are served from the same OpenAI-compatible endpoint and API key; switching is a change to the model string.

Specs and pricing

anthropic logoClaude Fable 5LLM-jp-3.1 8x13B instruct4
ProviderAnthropicLlm Jp
Input (per 1M tokens)¥1,787¥16
Output (per 1M tokens)¥8,935¥79
Typical cost (1,000 in + 500 out tokens × 1,000 calls)¥6,255¥56
Context window1,000,000 tokens4,096 tokens
Release date6/9/20263/21/2026
Input modalitiestext, image, filetext
Arena · overall#1 · ELO 1,507Unranked
Arena · Japanese#2 · ELO 1,526Unranked
Arena · coding#3 · ELO 1,551Unranked

Prices are FastMetal's yen rates before tax. Arena ranks are as of the latest leaderboard scrape.

Which should you pick?

  • On price, LLM-jp-3.1 8x13B instruct4: ¥79 per 1M output tokens, 99% less than Claude Fable 5.
  • For long documents, Claude Fable 5: a 1,000,000-token context window against 4,096 for LLM-jp-3.1 8x13B instruct4.
  • If in doubt, try both on the same key. Switching is a change to the model string, and each is billed at its own rate.

Real answers to the same prompts

Exactly what the FastMetal gateway returned, side by side. Not benchmark scores: actual output.

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'. Explain your reasoning step by step.

Claude Fable 5

# Counting 'r's in "strawberry" Let me spell out the word letter by letter and check each one: | Position | Letter | Is it 'r'? | |----------|--------|------------| | 1 | s | No | | 2 | t | No | | 3 | **r** | ✅ Yes (1st) | | 4 | a | No | | 5 | w | No | | 6 | b | No | | 7 | e | No | | 8 | **r** | ✅ Yes (2nd) | | 9 | **r** | ✅ Yes (3rd) | | 10 | y | No | ## Reasoning breakdown: - The word "strawberry" can be split into two parts: **straw** + **berry** - "straw" contains one 'r': st**r**aw - "berry" contains two 'r's: be**rr**y (a double-r) ## Answer: **3** There are **three 'r's** in "strawberry."
39.6s354 output tokens

LLM-jp-3.1 8x13B instruct4

To count the number of 'r's in the word 'strawberry', follow these steps: 1. Identify the word: The word we are examining is 'strawberry'. 2. Understand the task: We need to find and count all occurrences of the letter 'r' in this word. 3. Begin with the first letter: The first letter is 's', which is not 'r', so we move on to the next letter. 4. Proceed to the second letter: The second letter is 't', which is also not 'r', so we continue to the third letter. 5. Reach the third letter: The third letter is 'r'. We have found one 'r'. 6. Continue to the fourth letter: The fourth letter is 'a', which is not 'r', so we move on to the fifth letter. 7. Examine the fifth letter: The fifth letter i…
4.0s400 output tokens

Debug This Error

I'm getting the following error in my Node.js application: TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map') at UserList (/app/components/UserList.js:12:25) at renderWithHooks (/app/node_modules/rea…

Claude Fable 5

## Cause The error means that when `UserList` renders, the `users` prop is `undefined`, so calling `.map()` on it fails. This typically happens for one of these reasons: 1. **The parent isn't passing the prop** (or has a typo in the prop name): ```jsx <UserList /> // users is undefined <UserList user={users} /> // typo: "user" instead of "users" ``` 2. **Data is fetched asynchronously** — the component renders before the API call finishes, and the initial state is `undefined`: ```jsx const [users, setUsers] = useState(); // undefined initially! ``` ## Fixes **Option 1: Default parameter value** (quick fix) ```jsx function UserList({ users = [] }) { re…
51.3s686 output tokens

LLM-jp-3.1 8x13B instruct4

The error TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map') suggests that the 'users' argument passed to the UserList component is undefined or does not have a 'map' method. The cause of the problem may be that the users variable is not being passed correctly or is not defined in the parent component. Check the props being passed to the UserList component to ensure that they are defined and contain the expected data. To fix the issue, you can add some error handling and debugging to your component. Try logging the users variable to the console to verify that it is not undefined: ```jsx function UserList({ users }) { console.log("Users:", users); if (!users) { return <…
3.0s279 output tokens

Code Review

Please review the following Python function and suggest improvements for readability, performance, and best practices: def get_data(url, retries=3): import requests import time for i in range(retries):…

Claude Fable 5

# Code Review Your function works, but there are several issues worth addressing. Here's a breakdown by category: ## Issues Found ### 1. **Bare `except:` clause (critical)** This catches *everything*, including `KeyboardInterrupt`, `SystemExit`, and bugs like `KeyError` or `TypeError` in your own parsing code. You'll silently retry on programming errors and mask real problems. ### 2. **Imports inside the function** Imports belong at module level (PEP 8). Function-level imports add overhead on each call and hide dependencies. ### 3. **`== True` comparison** Use truthiness directly: `if item["active"]:` (PEP 8 explicitly recommends this). ### 4. **Silent failures** Returning `[]` on fail…
38.5s1528 output tokens

LLM-jp-3.1 8x13B instruct4

The provided Python function aims to get data from a URL using the requests library, filter out specific items based on their "active" field, and return the result. Here are some suggestions to improve readability, performance, and adherence to best practices: 1. Configure the linter (e.g., flake8 or pylint) to ensure code quality and enforce a consistent coding style. 2. Use type hints to improve readability and maintainability. 3. Use context managers (with statement) for handling requests: 4. Rewrite the function using a more functional programming style: Here's the improved version of the function: ```python import requests import time from typing import List, Dict, Any def get_da…
3.9s406 output tokens

Compare on more prompts →

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5 or LLM-jp-3.1 8x13B instruct4?
Per 1M output tokens, Claude Fable 5 is ¥8,935 and LLM-jp-3.1 8x13B instruct4 is ¥79 on FastMetal (yen, before tax), so LLM-jp-3.1 8x13B instruct4 is cheaper.
How do the context windows of Claude Fable 5 and LLM-jp-3.1 8x13B instruct4 compare?
Claude Fable 5 takes 1,000,000 tokens; LLM-jp-3.1 8x13B instruct4 takes 4,096.
Can I use Claude Fable 5 and LLM-jp-3.1 8x13B instruct4 with the same API key?
Yes. On FastMetal's OpenAI-compatible endpoint, switch by passing "anthropic-claude-fable-5" or "llm-jp-3.1-8x13b-instruct4" as the model. Each is billed at its own rate from the same prepaid balance.

Try both on one API key

Create an account and add credit to call Claude Fable 5 and LLM-jp-3.1 8x13B instruct4 from the browser chat and the API. No monthly fee.

More comparisons with Claude Fable 5

More comparisons with LLM-jp-3.1 8x13B instruct4