Model comparison

GLM 5.3 vs Solar Mini 4

Pricing, context window and real answers (September 2026)

GLM 5.3 (Z.ai) and Solar Mini 4 (Upstage), compared as you can actually call them on FastMetal. Both are served from the same OpenAI-compatible endpoint and API key; switching is a change to the model string.

Specs and pricing

z-ai logoGLM 5.3Solar Mini 4
ProviderZ.aiUpstage
Input (per 1M tokens)¥235.2¥8.94
Output (per 1M tokens)¥739.2¥35.74
Typical cost (1,000 in + 500 out tokens × 1,000 calls)¥605¥27
Context window1,048,576 tokens524,288 tokens
Release date8/18/20269/23/2026
Input modalitiestexttext
Throughput (p50)——
Arena · overall#19 · ELO 1,483Unranked
Arena · Japanese#35 · ELO 1,443Unranked
Arena · coding#20 · ELO 1,525Unranked

Prices are FastMetal's yen rates before tax. Arena ranks are as of the latest leaderboard scrape.

Which should you pick?

  • On price, Solar Mini 4: ¥35.74 per 1M output tokens, 95% less than GLM 5.3.
  • For long documents, GLM 5.3: a 1,048,576-token context window against 524,288 for Solar Mini 4.
  • If in doubt, try both on the same key. Switching is a change to the model string, and each is billed at its own rate.

Real answers to the same prompts

Exactly what the FastMetal gateway returned, side by side. Not benchmark scores: actual output.

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'. Explain your reasoning step by step.

GLM 5.3

# Counting 'r's in "strawberry" **Step 1: Spell out the word letter by letter.** s - t - r - a - w - b - e - r - r - y **Step 2: Go through each letter and mark the 'r's.** | Position | Letter | Is it 'r'? | |----------|--------|------------| | 1 | s | No | | 2 | t | No | | 3 | **r** | ✅ Yes (1st) | | 4 | a | No | | 5 | w | No | | 6 | b | No | | 7 | e | No | | 8 | **r** | ✅ Yes (2nd) | | 9 | **r** | ✅ Yes (3rd) | | 10 | y | No | **Step 3: Tally the results.** - 1st 'r' in "st**r**awberry" - 2nd 'r' in "strawbe**r**ry" - 3rd 'r' in "strawber**r**y" ## Answer: There are **3** 'r's in "strawberry." (Note: two of them appear together in the "rr" near the end, which is easy to miss when c…
5.8s493 output tokens

Solar Mini 4

Sure! Let’s count the letter **'r'** in the word **'strawberry'** step by step. **Step 1: Write out the word and its letters** `s t r a w b e r r y` **Step 2: Go through each letter one by one and check if it is 'r'** 1. `s` → not 'r' 2. `t` → not 'r' 3. `r` → **yes** (1st 'r') 4. `a` → not 'r' 5. `w` → not 'r' 6. `b` → not 'r' 7. `e` → not 'r' 8. `r` → **yes** (2nd 'r') 9. `r` → **yes** (3rd 'r') 10. `y` → not 'r' **Step 3: Tally the total** Total 'r' count = 3 **Final answer:** There are **3** letter 'r's in the word **'strawberry'**.
2.5s239 output tokens

Debug This Error

I'm getting the following error in my Node.js application: TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map') at UserList (/app/components/UserList.js:12:25) at renderWithHooks (/app/node_modules/rea…

GLM 5.3

## What's happening The error means `users` is `undefined` when the component renders. `undefined` doesn't have a `.map()` method, so JavaScript throws a `TypeError`. Since destructured props that aren't passed default to `undefined`, something upstream isn't providing the value you expect. ## Common causes 1. **The parent doesn't pass the prop, or uses a different name:** ```jsx <UserList /> {/* missing users */} <UserList userList={users} /> {/* prop name mismatch */} ``` 2. **Async data hasn't loaded yet** — the component renders before an API call completes, and the initial value is `undefined`: ```jsx const [users, setUsers] = useState(); // undefin…
17.1s1345 output tokens

Solar Mini 4

This error occurs because the `users` prop being passed to your `UserList` component is `undefined` (or the component is rendered without that prop), and your code tries to call `.map()` on it. ### 🔍 Why this happens In JavaScript, `undefined.map` is not a function, so calling it throws: ``` TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map') ``` This commonly happens when: - The parent component doesn't pass the `users` prop at all - The parent passes `users` as `undefined`, `null`, or a non-array value (like a promise, object, or string) - Data hasn't finished loading yet (e.g., fetched from an API asynchronously) ### ✅ How to fix it The most robust solution is to provide a…
9.2s701 output tokens

Code Review

Please review the following Python function and suggest improvements for readability, performance, and best practices: def get_data(url, retries=3): import requests import time for i in range(retries):…

GLM 5.3

Here's a breakdown of the issues, followed by a refactored version. ## Readability - **Move imports to module level.** PEP 8 requires top-level imports; importing inside a function hides dependencies and adds overhead on every call (small, but pointless). - **`item["active"] == True`** → just `item.get("active")`. Comparing to `True` with `==` is flagged by PEP 8, and `.get()` avoids a `KeyError` if the key is missing. - **Use a list comprehension** instead of initializing a list and appending in a loop. - **Rename things.** `get_data` doesn't say what it does (`fetch_active_items`?), and `response` beats `r`. Use `_` for the unused loop counter. - **Magic numbers** (`2`, `10`) should be n…
75.0s6434 output tokens

Solar Mini 4

Here’s a reviewed version of your function, followed by a breakdown of the improvements: ```python import time import requests from requests.adapters import HTTPAdapter from urllib3.util.retry import Retry def get_data(url: str, retries: int = 3) -> list[dict]: """ Fetch JSON from a URL and return a list of active items with name/id. Args: url: The endpoint to request. retries: Number of retry attempts on failure. Returns: A list of dicts matching {'name': str, 'id': any} for active items. """ if retries < 1: raise ValueError("retries must be at least 1") session = requests.Session() retry_strategy = Retry( total=re…
10.8s1278 output tokens

Compare on more prompts →

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, GLM 5.3 or Solar Mini 4?
Per 1M output tokens, GLM 5.3 is ¥739.2 and Solar Mini 4 is ¥35.74 on FastMetal (yen, before tax), so Solar Mini 4 is cheaper.
How do the context windows of GLM 5.3 and Solar Mini 4 compare?
GLM 5.3 takes 1,048,576 tokens; Solar Mini 4 takes 524,288.
Can I use GLM 5.3 and Solar Mini 4 with the same API key?
Yes. On FastMetal's OpenAI-compatible endpoint, switch by passing "glm-5.3" or "solar-mini4" as the model. Each is billed at its own rate from the same prepaid balance.

Try both on one API key

Create an account and add credit to call GLM 5.3 and Solar Mini 4 from the browser chat and the API. No monthly fee.

More comparisons with GLM 5.3

More comparisons with Solar Mini 4