Model comparison

Claude Fable 5 vs GLM 5.3

Pricing, context window and real answers (August 2026)

Claude Fable 5 (Anthropic) and GLM 5.3 (Z.ai), compared as you can actually call them on FastMetal. Both are served from the same OpenAI-compatible endpoint and API key; switching is a change to the model string.

Specs and pricing

anthropic logoClaude Fable 5z-ai logoGLM 5.3
ProviderAnthropicZ.ai
Input (per 1M tokens)¥1,787¥250.18
Output (per 1M tokens)¥8,935¥786.28
Typical cost (1,000 in + 500 out tokens × 1,000 calls)¥6,255¥643
Context window1,000,000 tokens1,048,576 tokens
Release date6/9/20268/18/2026
Input modalitiestext, image, filetext
Arena · overall#1 · ELO 1,508Unranked
Arena · Japanese#1 · ELO 1,529Unranked
Arena · coding#2 · ELO 1,552Unranked

Prices are FastMetal's yen rates before tax. Arena ranks are as of the latest leaderboard scrape.

Which should you pick?

  • On price, GLM 5.3: ¥786.28 per 1M output tokens, 91% less than Claude Fable 5.
  • For long documents, GLM 5.3: a 1,048,576-token context window against 1,000,000 for Claude Fable 5.
  • If in doubt, try both on the same key. Switching is a change to the model string, and each is billed at its own rate.

Real answers to the same prompts

Exactly what the FastMetal gateway returned, side by side. Not benchmark scores: actual output.

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'. Explain your reasoning step by step.

Claude Fable 5

# Counting 'r's in "strawberry" Let me spell out the word letter by letter and check each one: | Position | Letter | Is it 'r'? | |----------|--------|------------| | 1 | s | No | | 2 | t | No | | 3 | **r** | ✅ Yes (1st) | | 4 | a | No | | 5 | w | No | | 6 | b | No | | 7 | e | No | | 8 | **r** | ✅ Yes (2nd) | | 9 | **r** | ✅ Yes (3rd) | | 10 | y | No | ## Reasoning breakdown: - The word "strawberry" can be split into two parts: **straw** + **berry** - "straw" contains one 'r': st**r**aw - "berry" contains two 'r's: be**rr**y (a double-r) ## Answer: **3** There are **three 'r's** in "strawberry."
39.6s354 output tokens

GLM 5.3

# Counting 'r's in "strawberry" **Step 1: Spell out the word letter by letter.** s - t - r - a - w - b - e - r - r - y **Step 2: Go through each letter and mark the 'r's.** | Position | Letter | Is it 'r'? | |----------|--------|------------| | 1 | s | No | | 2 | t | No | | 3 | **r** | ✅ Yes (1st) | | 4 | a | No | | 5 | w | No | | 6 | b | No | | 7 | e | No | | 8 | **r** | ✅ Yes (2nd) | | 9 | **r** | ✅ Yes (3rd) | | 10 | y | No | **Step 3: Tally the results.** - 1st 'r' in "st**r**awberry" - 2nd 'r' in "strawbe**r**ry" - 3rd 'r' in "strawber**r**y" ## Answer: There are **3** 'r's in "strawberry." (Note: two of them appear together in the "rr" near the end, which is easy to miss when c…
5.8s493 output tokens

Debug This Error

I'm getting the following error in my Node.js application: TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map') at UserList (/app/components/UserList.js:12:25) at renderWithHooks (/app/node_modules/rea…

Claude Fable 5

## Cause The error means that when `UserList` renders, the `users` prop is `undefined`, so calling `.map()` on it fails. This typically happens for one of these reasons: 1. **The parent isn't passing the prop** (or has a typo in the prop name): ```jsx <UserList /> // users is undefined <UserList user={users} /> // typo: "user" instead of "users" ``` 2. **Data is fetched asynchronously** — the component renders before the API call finishes, and the initial state is `undefined`: ```jsx const [users, setUsers] = useState(); // undefined initially! ``` ## Fixes **Option 1: Default parameter value** (quick fix) ```jsx function UserList({ users = [] }) { re…
51.3s686 output tokens

GLM 5.3

## What's happening The error means `users` is `undefined` when the component renders. `undefined` doesn't have a `.map()` method, so JavaScript throws a `TypeError`. Since destructured props that aren't passed default to `undefined`, something upstream isn't providing the value you expect. ## Common causes 1. **The parent doesn't pass the prop, or uses a different name:** ```jsx <UserList /> {/* missing users */} <UserList userList={users} /> {/* prop name mismatch */} ``` 2. **Async data hasn't loaded yet** — the component renders before an API call completes, and the initial value is `undefined`: ```jsx const [users, setUsers] = useState(); // undefin…
17.1s1345 output tokens

Code Review

Please review the following Python function and suggest improvements for readability, performance, and best practices: def get_data(url, retries=3): import requests import time for i in range(retries):…

Claude Fable 5

# Code Review Your function works, but there are several issues worth addressing. Here's a breakdown by category: ## Issues Found ### 1. **Bare `except:` clause (critical)** This catches *everything*, including `KeyboardInterrupt`, `SystemExit`, and bugs like `KeyError` or `TypeError` in your own parsing code. You'll silently retry on programming errors and mask real problems. ### 2. **Imports inside the function** Imports belong at module level (PEP 8). Function-level imports add overhead on each call and hide dependencies. ### 3. **`== True` comparison** Use truthiness directly: `if item["active"]:` (PEP 8 explicitly recommends this). ### 4. **Silent failures** Returning `[]` on fail…
38.5s1528 output tokens

GLM 5.3

Here's a breakdown of the issues, followed by a refactored version. ## Readability - **Move imports to module level.** PEP 8 requires top-level imports; importing inside a function hides dependencies and adds overhead on every call (small, but pointless). - **`item["active"] == True`** → just `item.get("active")`. Comparing to `True` with `==` is flagged by PEP 8, and `.get()` avoids a `KeyError` if the key is missing. - **Use a list comprehension** instead of initializing a list and appending in a loop. - **Rename things.** `get_data` doesn't say what it does (`fetch_active_items`?), and `response` beats `r`. Use `_` for the unused loop counter. - **Magic numbers** (`2`, `10`) should be n…
75.0s6434 output tokens

Compare on more prompts →

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5 or GLM 5.3?
Per 1M output tokens, Claude Fable 5 is ¥8,935 and GLM 5.3 is ¥786.28 on FastMetal (yen, before tax), so GLM 5.3 is cheaper.
How do the context windows of Claude Fable 5 and GLM 5.3 compare?
Claude Fable 5 takes 1,000,000 tokens; GLM 5.3 takes 1,048,576.
Can I use Claude Fable 5 and GLM 5.3 with the same API key?
Yes. On FastMetal's OpenAI-compatible endpoint, switch by passing "anthropic-claude-fable-5" or "glm-5.3" as the model. Each is billed at its own rate from the same prepaid balance.

Try both on one API key

Create an account and add credit to call Claude Fable 5 and GLM 5.3 from the browser chat and the API. No monthly fee.

More comparisons with Claude Fable 5

More comparisons with GLM 5.3