Model comparison

Claude Opus 5 vs GLM 5.3

Pricing, context window and real answers (August 2026)

Claude Opus 5 (Anthropic) and GLM 5.3 (Z.ai), compared as you can actually call them on FastMetal. Both are served from the same OpenAI-compatible endpoint and API key; switching is a change to the model string.

Specs and pricing

anthropic logoClaude Opus 5z-ai logoGLM 5.3
ProviderAnthropicZ.ai
Input (per 1M tokens)¥893.5¥250.18
Output (per 1M tokens)¥4,467.5¥786.28
Typical cost (1,000 in + 500 out tokens × 1,000 calls)¥3,127¥643
Context window1,000,000 tokens1,048,576 tokens
Release date7/24/20268/18/2026
Input modalitiestext, image, filetext
Arena · overall#5 · ELO 1,495Unranked
Arena · JapaneseUnrankedUnranked
Arena · coding#7 · ELO 1,535Unranked

Prices are FastMetal's yen rates before tax. Arena ranks are as of the latest leaderboard scrape.

Which should you pick?

  • On price, GLM 5.3: ¥786.28 per 1M output tokens, 82% less than Claude Opus 5.
  • For long documents, GLM 5.3: a 1,048,576-token context window against 1,000,000 for Claude Opus 5.
  • If in doubt, try both on the same key. Switching is a change to the model string, and each is billed at its own rate.

Real answers to the same prompts

Exactly what the FastMetal gateway returned, side by side. Not benchmark scores: actual output.

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'. Explain your reasoning step by step.

Claude Opus 5

## Counting the 'r's in "strawberry" **Step 1: Break the word into individual letters** | Position | Letter | |----------|--------| | 1 | s | | 2 | t | | 3 | **r** | | 4 | a | | 5 | w | | 6 | b | | 7 | e | | 8 | **r** | | 9 | **r** | | 10 | y | **Step 2: Identify each occurrence of 'r'** - Position 3: the 'r' in the "str-" beginning - Position 8: the first 'r' in the "-rry" ending - Position 9: the second 'r' in the "-rry" ending **Step 3: Tally them up** 3 + 8 + 9 → that's **3 occurrences**. ## Answer: 3 The tricky part is that "strawberry" contains a *double* 'r' near the end ("berry"), which is easy to skim over as a single letter. Splitting the word into "straw" (1 'r') + "berry"…
7.1s466 output tokens

GLM 5.3

# Counting 'r's in "strawberry" **Step 1: Spell out the word letter by letter.** s - t - r - a - w - b - e - r - r - y **Step 2: Go through each letter and mark the 'r's.** | Position | Letter | Is it 'r'? | |----------|--------|------------| | 1 | s | No | | 2 | t | No | | 3 | **r** | ✅ Yes (1st) | | 4 | a | No | | 5 | w | No | | 6 | b | No | | 7 | e | No | | 8 | **r** | ✅ Yes (2nd) | | 9 | **r** | ✅ Yes (3rd) | | 10 | y | No | **Step 3: Tally the results.** - 1st 'r' in "st**r**awberry" - 2nd 'r' in "strawbe**r**ry" - 3rd 'r' in "strawber**r**y" ## Answer: There are **3** 'r's in "strawberry." (Note: two of them appear together in the "rr" near the end, which is easy to miss when c…
5.8s493 output tokens

Debug This Error

I'm getting the following error in my Node.js application: TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map') at UserList (/app/components/UserList.js:12:25) at renderWithHooks (/app/node_modules/rea…

Claude Opus 5

## What's happening The error means `users` is `undefined` when `UserList` renders — so calling `.map()` on it throws. React isn't the problem; the prop simply isn't there yet (or ever). The three most common causes: 1. **The parent isn't passing the prop** (or passes it under a different name / typo): ```jsx <UserList /> // users is undefined <UserList user={data} /> // wrong name ``` 2. **The data is fetched asynchronously**, and the first render happens before it arrives: ```jsx const [users, setUsers] = useState(); // undefined on first render! useEffect(() => { fetch('/api/users').then(r => r.json()).then(setUsers); }, []); return <UserList user…
15.1s1191 output tokens

GLM 5.3

## What's happening The error means `users` is `undefined` when the component renders. `undefined` doesn't have a `.map()` method, so JavaScript throws a `TypeError`. Since destructured props that aren't passed default to `undefined`, something upstream isn't providing the value you expect. ## Common causes 1. **The parent doesn't pass the prop, or uses a different name:** ```jsx <UserList /> {/* missing users */} <UserList userList={users} /> {/* prop name mismatch */} ``` 2. **Async data hasn't loaded yet** — the component renders before an API call completes, and the initial value is `undefined`: ```jsx const [users, setUsers] = useState(); // undefin…
17.1s1345 output tokens

Code Review

Please review the following Python function and suggest improvements for readability, performance, and best practices: def get_data(url, retries=3): import requests import time for i in range(retries):…

Claude Opus 5

# Code Review: `get_data` Overall, the function works for the happy path, but there are several issues worth addressing — the most serious being the bare `except`, the silent failure mode, and the conflation of two responsibilities (fetching and transforming). ## Critical Issues ### 1. Bare `except` swallows everything ```python except: time.sleep(2) ``` This catches `KeyboardInterrupt`, `SystemExit`, `MemoryError`, and — importantly — bugs in your own code. If `item["active"]` raises a `KeyError` because the API changed its schema, you'll retry three times and return `[]`, giving you no indication anything went wrong. Catch `requests.RequestException` instead (the base class for all…
34.7s2823 output tokens

GLM 5.3

Here's a breakdown of the issues, followed by a refactored version. ## Readability - **Move imports to module level.** PEP 8 requires top-level imports; importing inside a function hides dependencies and adds overhead on every call (small, but pointless). - **`item["active"] == True`** → just `item.get("active")`. Comparing to `True` with `==` is flagged by PEP 8, and `.get()` avoids a `KeyError` if the key is missing. - **Use a list comprehension** instead of initializing a list and appending in a loop. - **Rename things.** `get_data` doesn't say what it does (`fetch_active_items`?), and `response` beats `r`. Use `_` for the unused loop counter. - **Magic numbers** (`2`, `10`) should be n…
75.0s6434 output tokens

Compare on more prompts →

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 5 or GLM 5.3?
Per 1M output tokens, Claude Opus 5 is ¥4,467.5 and GLM 5.3 is ¥786.28 on FastMetal (yen, before tax), so GLM 5.3 is cheaper.
How do the context windows of Claude Opus 5 and GLM 5.3 compare?
Claude Opus 5 takes 1,000,000 tokens; GLM 5.3 takes 1,048,576.
Can I use Claude Opus 5 and GLM 5.3 with the same API key?
Yes. On FastMetal's OpenAI-compatible endpoint, switch by passing "anthropic-claude-opus-5" or "glm-5.3" as the model. Each is billed at its own rate from the same prepaid balance.

Try both on one API key

Create an account and add credit to call Claude Opus 5 and GLM 5.3 from the browser chat and the API. No monthly fee.

More comparisons with Claude Opus 5

More comparisons with GLM 5.3