Model comparison

Claude Opus 4.8 vs GLM 5.3

Pricing, context window and real answers (August 2026)

Claude Opus 4.8 (Anthropic) and GLM 5.3 (Z.ai), compared as you can actually call them on FastMetal. Both are served from the same OpenAI-compatible endpoint and API key; switching is a change to the model string.

Specs and pricing

anthropic logoClaude Opus 4.8z-ai logoGLM 5.3
ProviderAnthropicZ.ai
Input (per 1M tokens)¥893.5¥250.18
Output (per 1M tokens)¥4,467.5¥786.28
Typical cost (1,000 in + 500 out tokens × 1,000 calls)¥3,127¥643
Context window1,000,000 tokens1,048,576 tokens
Release date5/27/20268/18/2026
Input modalitiestext, image, filetext
Arena · overall#22 · ELO 1,474Unranked
Arena · Japanese#26 · ELO 1,448Unranked
Arena · coding#12 · ELO 1,528Unranked

Prices are FastMetal's yen rates before tax. Arena ranks are as of the latest leaderboard scrape.

Which should you pick?

  • On price, GLM 5.3: ¥786.28 per 1M output tokens, 82% less than Claude Opus 4.8.
  • For long documents, GLM 5.3: a 1,048,576-token context window against 1,000,000 for Claude Opus 4.8.
  • If in doubt, try both on the same key. Switching is a change to the model string, and each is billed at its own rate.

Real answers to the same prompts

Exactly what the FastMetal gateway returned, side by side. Not benchmark scores: actual output.

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'. Explain your reasoning step by step.

Claude Opus 4.8

# Counting 'r's in "strawberry" ## Step-by-step process: Let me go through each letter one at a time: | Position | Letter | Is it 'r'? | |----------|--------|-----------| | 1 | s | No | | 2 | t | No | | 3 | r | ✓ Yes (1) | | 4 | a | No | | 5 | w | No | | 6 | b | No | | 7 | e | No | | 8 | r | ✓ Yes (2) | | 9 | r | ✓ Yes (3) | | 10 | y | No | ## Answer: There are **3** 'r's in "strawberry". The three 'r's appear at positions 3, 8, and 9 — one after the "st" and two together in the "rry" ending.
4.5s262 output tokens

GLM 5.3

# Counting 'r's in "strawberry" **Step 1: Spell out the word letter by letter.** s - t - r - a - w - b - e - r - r - y **Step 2: Go through each letter and mark the 'r's.** | Position | Letter | Is it 'r'? | |----------|--------|------------| | 1 | s | No | | 2 | t | No | | 3 | **r** | ✅ Yes (1st) | | 4 | a | No | | 5 | w | No | | 6 | b | No | | 7 | e | No | | 8 | **r** | ✅ Yes (2nd) | | 9 | **r** | ✅ Yes (3rd) | | 10 | y | No | **Step 3: Tally the results.** - 1st 'r' in "st**r**awberry" - 2nd 'r' in "strawbe**r**ry" - 3rd 'r' in "strawber**r**y" ## Answer: There are **3** 'r's in "strawberry." (Note: two of them appear together in the "rr" near the end, which is easy to miss when c…
5.8s493 output tokens

Debug This Error

I'm getting the following error in my Node.js application: TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map') at UserList (/app/components/UserList.js:12:25) at renderWithHooks (/app/node_modules/rea…

Claude Opus 4.8

# What's Causing the Error The error tells you exactly what's happening: ``` TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map') at UserList (/app/components/UserList.js:12:25) ``` At the moment `UserList` renders, the `users` prop is `undefined`, and you can't call `.map()` on `undefined`. This is extremely common when data is fetched asynchronously—the component renders **before** the data arrives. Common reasons `users` is undefined: - The parent hasn't passed the `users` prop at all - Data is still loading from an API (initial state is `undefined`) - The API response shape differs from what you expect (e.g. `data.users` vs `data`) --- # How to Fix It ## Option 1: De…
11.3s761 output tokens

GLM 5.3

## What's happening The error means `users` is `undefined` when the component renders. `undefined` doesn't have a `.map()` method, so JavaScript throws a `TypeError`. Since destructured props that aren't passed default to `undefined`, something upstream isn't providing the value you expect. ## Common causes 1. **The parent doesn't pass the prop, or uses a different name:** ```jsx <UserList /> {/* missing users */} <UserList userList={users} /> {/* prop name mismatch */} ``` 2. **Async data hasn't loaded yet** — the component renders before an API call completes, and the initial value is `undefined`: ```jsx const [users, setUsers] = useState(); // undefin…
17.1s1345 output tokens

Code Review

Please review the following Python function and suggest improvements for readability, performance, and best practices: def get_data(url, retries=3): import requests import time for i in range(retries):…

Claude Opus 4.8

# Code Review Here's a breakdown of issues and suggested improvements for your function. ## Key Issues 1. **Imports inside the function** — should be at module level (runs on every call, harder to see dependencies). 2. **Bare `except:`** — catches everything, including `KeyboardInterrupt` and `SystemExit`. Silently swallowing errors makes debugging hard. 3. **Magic numbers** — `10`, `2`, `200` scattered around; extract as parameters/constants. 4. **`== True` comparison** — non-Pythonic; use the value directly (or `is True` if strict). 5. **Blocking `time.sleep(2)`** — fixed delay; exponential backoff is a better practice. 6. **`r.status_code == 200`** — misses other success codes; use `ra…
16.9s1403 output tokens

GLM 5.3

Here's a breakdown of the issues, followed by a refactored version. ## Readability - **Move imports to module level.** PEP 8 requires top-level imports; importing inside a function hides dependencies and adds overhead on every call (small, but pointless). - **`item["active"] == True`** → just `item.get("active")`. Comparing to `True` with `==` is flagged by PEP 8, and `.get()` avoids a `KeyError` if the key is missing. - **Use a list comprehension** instead of initializing a list and appending in a loop. - **Rename things.** `get_data` doesn't say what it does (`fetch_active_items`?), and `response` beats `r`. Use `_` for the unused loop counter. - **Magic numbers** (`2`, `10`) should be n…
75.0s6434 output tokens

Compare on more prompts →

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.8 or GLM 5.3?
Per 1M output tokens, Claude Opus 4.8 is ¥4,467.5 and GLM 5.3 is ¥786.28 on FastMetal (yen, before tax), so GLM 5.3 is cheaper.
How do the context windows of Claude Opus 4.8 and GLM 5.3 compare?
Claude Opus 4.8 takes 1,000,000 tokens; GLM 5.3 takes 1,048,576.
Can I use Claude Opus 4.8 and GLM 5.3 with the same API key?
Yes. On FastMetal's OpenAI-compatible endpoint, switch by passing "anthropic-claude-opus-4-8" or "glm-5.3" as the model. Each is billed at its own rate from the same prepaid balance.

Try both on one API key

Create an account and add credit to call Claude Opus 4.8 and GLM 5.3 from the browser chat and the API. No monthly fee.

More comparisons with Claude Opus 4.8

More comparisons with GLM 5.3