Model comparison

GLM 5.3 vs Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B

Pricing, context window and real answers (August 2026)

GLM 5.3 (Z.ai) and Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B (Qwen), compared as you can actually call them on FastMetal. Both are served from the same OpenAI-compatible endpoint and API key; switching is a change to the model string.

Specs and pricing

z-ai logoGLM 5.3qwen logoQwen3.8 2.4T A95B
ProviderZ.aiQwen
Input (per 1M tokens)¥250.18¥351.83
Output (per 1M tokens)¥786.28¥1,055.5
Typical cost (1,000 in + 500 out tokens × 1,000 calls)¥643¥880
Context window1,048,576 tokens1,048,576 tokens
Release date8/18/20268/12/2026
Input modalitiestexttext
Arena · overall#15 · ELO 1,484Unranked
Arena · JapaneseUnrankedUnranked
Arena · coding#11 · ELO 1,531Unranked

Prices are FastMetal's yen rates before tax. Arena ranks are as of the latest leaderboard scrape.

Which should you pick?

  • On price, GLM 5.3: ¥786.28 per 1M output tokens, 26% less than Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B.
  • If in doubt, try both on the same key. Switching is a change to the model string, and each is billed at its own rate.

Real answers to the same prompts

Exactly what the FastMetal gateway returned, side by side. Not benchmark scores: actual output.

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'. Explain your reasoning step by step.

GLM 5.3

# Counting 'r's in "strawberry" **Step 1: Spell out the word letter by letter.** s - t - r - a - w - b - e - r - r - y **Step 2: Go through each letter and mark the 'r's.** | Position | Letter | Is it 'r'? | |----------|--------|------------| | 1 | s | No | | 2 | t | No | | 3 | **r** | ✅ Yes (1st) | | 4 | a | No | | 5 | w | No | | 6 | b | No | | 7 | e | No | | 8 | **r** | ✅ Yes (2nd) | | 9 | **r** | ✅ Yes (3rd) | | 10 | y | No | **Step 3: Tally the results.** - 1st 'r' in "st**r**awberry" - 2nd 'r' in "strawbe**r**ry" - 3rd 'r' in "strawber**r**y" ## Answer: There are **3** 'r's in "strawberry." (Note: two of them appear together in the "rr" near the end, which is easy to miss when c…
5.8s493 output tokens

Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B

To count the number of **“r”**s in **“strawberry”**, spell it out letter by letter: **s t r a w b e r r y** Now check each letter: 1. s — not r 2. t — not r 3. r — yes, count 1 4. a — not r 5. w — not r 6. b — not r 7. e — not r 8. r — yes, count 2 9. r — yes, count 3 10. y — not r So there are **3** “r”s in **strawberry**.
1.3s203 output tokens

Debug This Error

I'm getting the following error in my Node.js application: TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map') at UserList (/app/components/UserList.js:12:25) at renderWithHooks (/app/node_modules/rea…

GLM 5.3

## What's happening The error means `users` is `undefined` when the component renders. `undefined` doesn't have a `.map()` method, so JavaScript throws a `TypeError`. Since destructured props that aren't passed default to `undefined`, something upstream isn't providing the value you expect. ## Common causes 1. **The parent doesn't pass the prop, or uses a different name:** ```jsx <UserList /> {/* missing users */} <UserList userList={users} /> {/* prop name mismatch */} ``` 2. **Async data hasn't loaded yet** — the component renders before an API call completes, and the initial value is `undefined`: ```jsx const [users, setUsers] = useState(); // undefin…
17.1s1345 output tokens

Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B

The error happens because `users` is `undefined` when React tries to render this line: ```js {users.map(user => <li key={user.id}>{user.name}</li>)} ``` JavaScript cannot call `.map()` on `undefined`. In your component: ```js function UserList({ users }) { return ( <ul> {users.map(user => <li key={user.id}>{user.name}</li>)} </ul> ); } ``` React expects `users` to be an array, but something is rendering `<UserList />` without providing a valid `users` prop. --- ## Common causes ### 1. The parent component is not passing `users` For example: ```js <UserList /> ``` Instead of: ```js <UserList users={users} /> ``` --- ### 2. The data has not loaded yet If `users…
10.9s1318 output tokens

Professional Email

Write a professional email to a client explaining that the project delivery will be delayed by two weeks due to unexpected technical challenges discovered during integration testing. The tone should be apologetic but con…

GLM 5.3

**Subject: [Project Name] – Revised Delivery Timeline & Mitigation Plan** Dear [Client Name], I'm writing to inform you of a change to the delivery timeline for [Project Name], and to share the concrete steps we're taking to keep the project moving forward. During integration testing, our team identified unexpected technical challenges in [brief description — e.g., the data synchronization between the two platforms / third-party API compatibility]. Resolving these issues properly requires additional time, and rather than rush a workaround, we want to ensure the final delivery meets the quality standards you expect from us. **Revised Timeline** - Original delivery date: [Original Date] -…
21.7s1683 output tokens

Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B

Subject: Updated Project Timeline – Revised Delivery Date Dear [Client Name], I hope this message finds you well. I’m writing to provide an important update regarding the delivery timeline for [Project Name]. During our recent integration testing phase, we identified several unexpected technical challenges that require additional resolution to ensure the final deliverable meets the quality and performance standards we committed to. After carefully reviewing the scope of these items with our technical team, we have determined that the project delivery will need to be extended by two weeks. I sincerely apologize for any inconvenience this may cause. Please be assured that we are taking imm…
4.6s449 output tokens

Compare on more prompts →

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, GLM 5.3 or Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B?
Per 1M output tokens, GLM 5.3 is ¥786.28 and Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B is ¥1,055.5 on FastMetal (yen, before tax), so GLM 5.3 is cheaper.
How do the context windows of GLM 5.3 and Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B compare?
GLM 5.3 takes 1,048,576 tokens; Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B takes 1,048,576.
Can I use GLM 5.3 and Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B with the same API key?
Yes. On FastMetal's OpenAI-compatible endpoint, switch by passing "glm-5.3" or "qwen3.8-2.4t-a95b" as the model. Each is billed at its own rate from the same prepaid balance.

Try both on one API key

Create an account and add credit to call GLM 5.3 and Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B from the browser chat and the API. No monthly fee.

More comparisons with GLM 5.3

More comparisons with Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B