GLM 5.3 vs GLM 5.3 Flash
Pricing, context window and real answers (August 2026)
GLM 5.3 (Z.ai) and GLM 5.3 Flash (Z.ai), compared as you can actually call them on FastMetal. Both are served from the same OpenAI-compatible endpoint and API key; switching is a change to the model string.
Specs and pricing
| Provider | Z.ai | Z.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Input (per 1M tokens) | ¥250.18 | ¥13.19 |
| Output (per 1M tokens) | ¥786.28 | ¥43.98 |
| Typical cost (1,000 in + 500 out tokens × 1,000 calls) | ¥643 | ¥35 |
| Context window | 1,048,576 tokens | 1,310,720 tokens |
| Release date | 8/18/2026 | 8/26/2026 |
| Input modalities | text | text, image, video |
| Arena · overall | #15 · ELO 1,484 | #38 · ELO 1,469 |
| Arena · Japanese | Unranked | Unranked |
| Arena · coding | #11 · ELO 1,531 | #11 · ELO 1,531 |
Prices are FastMetal's yen rates before tax. Arena ranks are as of the latest leaderboard scrape.
Which should you pick?
- On price, GLM 5.3 Flash: ¥43.98 per 1M output tokens, 94% less than GLM 5.3.
- On the Overall arena board, GLM 5.3 ranks higher (#15; GLM 5.3 Flash is #38).
- For long documents, GLM 5.3 Flash: a 1,310,720-token context window against 1,048,576 for GLM 5.3.
- If in doubt, try both on the same key. Switching is a change to the model string, and each is billed at its own rate.
Real answers to the same prompts
Exactly what the FastMetal gateway returned, side by side. Not benchmark scores: actual output.
Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'
Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'. Explain your reasoning step by step.
GLM 5.3
GLM 5.3 Flash
Debug This Error
I'm getting the following error in my Node.js application: TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map') at UserList (/app/components/UserList.js:12:25) at renderWithHooks (/app/node_modules/rea…
GLM 5.3
GLM 5.3 Flash
Code Review
Please review the following Python function and suggest improvements for readability, performance, and best practices: def get_data(url, retries=3): import requests import time for i in range(retries):…
GLM 5.3
GLM 5.3 Flash
Frequently asked questions
- Which is cheaper, GLM 5.3 or GLM 5.3 Flash?
- Per 1M output tokens, GLM 5.3 is ¥786.28 and GLM 5.3 Flash is ¥43.98 on FastMetal (yen, before tax), so GLM 5.3 Flash is cheaper.
- How do the context windows of GLM 5.3 and GLM 5.3 Flash compare?
- GLM 5.3 takes 1,048,576 tokens; GLM 5.3 Flash takes 1,310,720.
- Which ranks higher, GLM 5.3 or GLM 5.3 Flash?
- GLM 5.3 ranks higher on the public arena (GLM 5.3 #15, GLM 5.3 Flash #38). Ranks move as the leaderboard updates.
- Can I use GLM 5.3 and GLM 5.3 Flash with the same API key?
- Yes. On FastMetal's OpenAI-compatible endpoint, switch by passing "glm-5.3" or "glm-5.3-flash" as the model. Each is billed at its own rate from the same prepaid balance.
Try both on one API key
Create an account and add credit to call GLM 5.3 and GLM 5.3 Flash from the browser chat and the API. No monthly fee.