Model comparison

Gemini 3.5 Flash vs GLM 5.3

Pricing, context window and real answers (August 2026)

Gemini 3.5 Flash (Google) and GLM 5.3 (Z.ai), compared as you can actually call them on FastMetal. Both are served from the same OpenAI-compatible endpoint and API key; switching is a change to the model string.

Specs and pricing

google logoGemini 3.5 Flashz-ai logoGLM 5.3
ProviderGoogleZ.ai
Input (per 1M tokens)¥268.05¥250.18
Output (per 1M tokens)¥1,608.3¥786.28
Typical cost (1,000 in + 500 out tokens × 1,000 calls)¥1,072¥643
Context window1,048,576 tokens1,048,576 tokens
Release date5/19/20268/18/2026
Input modalitiestext, image, video, file, audiotext
Arena · overall#18 · ELO 1,476Unranked
Arena · Japanese#20 · ELO 1,456Unranked
Arena · coding#45 · ELO 1,507Unranked

Prices are FastMetal's yen rates before tax. Arena ranks are as of the latest leaderboard scrape.

Which should you pick?

  • On price, GLM 5.3: ¥786.28 per 1M output tokens, 51% less than Gemini 3.5 Flash.
  • If in doubt, try both on the same key. Switching is a change to the model string, and each is billed at its own rate.

Real answers to the same prompts

Exactly what the FastMetal gateway returned, side by side. Not benchmark scores: actual output.

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'. Explain your reasoning step by step.

Gemini 3.5 Flash

There are **3** 'r's in the word "strawberry". Here is the step-by-step breakdown of how to count them: 1. **Break the word down into its individual letters:** * 1st letter: **s** * 2nd letter: **t** * 3rd letter: **r** (First 'r') * 4th letter: **a** * 5th letter: **w** * 6th letter: **b** * 7th letter: **e** * 8th letter: **r** (Second 'r') * 9th letter: **r** (Third 'r') * 10th letter: **y** 2. **Identify and count only the 'r's:** * s - t - **r** (1) - a - w - b - e - **r** (2) - **r** (3) - y By counting them as we go through the word, we find a total of **3** 'r's.
4.8s601 output tokens

GLM 5.3

# Counting 'r's in "strawberry" **Step 1: Spell out the word letter by letter.** s - t - r - a - w - b - e - r - r - y **Step 2: Go through each letter and mark the 'r's.** | Position | Letter | Is it 'r'? | |----------|--------|------------| | 1 | s | No | | 2 | t | No | | 3 | **r** | ✅ Yes (1st) | | 4 | a | No | | 5 | w | No | | 6 | b | No | | 7 | e | No | | 8 | **r** | ✅ Yes (2nd) | | 9 | **r** | ✅ Yes (3rd) | | 10 | y | No | **Step 3: Tally the results.** - 1st 'r' in "st**r**awberry" - 2nd 'r' in "strawbe**r**ry" - 3rd 'r' in "strawber**r**y" ## Answer: There are **3** 'r's in "strawberry." (Note: two of them appear together in the "rr" near the end, which is easy to miss when c…
5.8s493 output tokens

Debug This Error

I'm getting the following error in my Node.js application: TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map') at UserList (/app/components/UserList.js:12:25) at renderWithHooks (/app/node_modules/rea…

Gemini 3.5 Flash

### What is causing this error? The error `TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map')` means that your `UserList` component is trying to call `.map()` on the `users` variable, but **`users` is currently `undefined`**. This usually happens for one of two reasons: 1. **The parent component forgot to pass the prop:** `<UserList />` was rendered without the `users` attribute. 2. **Asynchronous data fetching:** The parent component fetches the users from an API, but the API request hasn't finished yet when the component first renders, so `users` starts as `undefined`. --- ### How to fix it Here are the three best ways to fix this, depending on how you want your UI to beh…
11.2s1524 output tokens

GLM 5.3

## What's happening The error means `users` is `undefined` when the component renders. `undefined` doesn't have a `.map()` method, so JavaScript throws a `TypeError`. Since destructured props that aren't passed default to `undefined`, something upstream isn't providing the value you expect. ## Common causes 1. **The parent doesn't pass the prop, or uses a different name:** ```jsx <UserList /> {/* missing users */} <UserList userList={users} /> {/* prop name mismatch */} ``` 2. **Async data hasn't loaded yet** — the component renders before an API call completes, and the initial value is `undefined`: ```jsx const [users, setUsers] = useState(); // undefin…
17.1s1345 output tokens

Code Review

Please review the following Python function and suggest improvements for readability, performance, and best practices: def get_data(url, retries=3): import requests import time for i in range(retries):…

Gemini 3.5 Flash

Here is a review of your function, followed by two improved versions (one that keeps your structure but makes it Pythonic, and one production-ready version that uses industry best practices). --- ### Key Areas for Improvement 1. **Imports inside the function:** `import requests` and `import time` should be at the top of the file (PEP 8). Keeping them inside the function slows down execution if the function is called repeatedly. 2. **Bare `except:` clause:** Using `except:` without specifying an exception type is a major anti-pattern. It catches things you don't want to catch, like `KeyboardInterrupt` (Ctrl+C) or `SystemExit`. It should target `requests.RequestException`. 3. **Implicit `Tr…
19.7s2975 output tokens

GLM 5.3

Here's a breakdown of the issues, followed by a refactored version. ## Readability - **Move imports to module level.** PEP 8 requires top-level imports; importing inside a function hides dependencies and adds overhead on every call (small, but pointless). - **`item["active"] == True`** → just `item.get("active")`. Comparing to `True` with `==` is flagged by PEP 8, and `.get()` avoids a `KeyError` if the key is missing. - **Use a list comprehension** instead of initializing a list and appending in a loop. - **Rename things.** `get_data` doesn't say what it does (`fetch_active_items`?), and `response` beats `r`. Use `_` for the unused loop counter. - **Magic numbers** (`2`, `10`) should be n…
75.0s6434 output tokens

Compare on more prompts →

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.5 Flash or GLM 5.3?
Per 1M output tokens, Gemini 3.5 Flash is ¥1,608.3 and GLM 5.3 is ¥786.28 on FastMetal (yen, before tax), so GLM 5.3 is cheaper.
How do the context windows of Gemini 3.5 Flash and GLM 5.3 compare?
Gemini 3.5 Flash takes 1,048,576 tokens; GLM 5.3 takes 1,048,576.
Can I use Gemini 3.5 Flash and GLM 5.3 with the same API key?
Yes. On FastMetal's OpenAI-compatible endpoint, switch by passing "gemini-3.5-flash" or "glm-5.3" as the model. Each is billed at its own rate from the same prepaid balance.

Try both on one API key

Create an account and add credit to call Gemini 3.5 Flash and GLM 5.3 from the browser chat and the API. No monthly fee.

More comparisons with Gemini 3.5 Flash

More comparisons with GLM 5.3