Model comparison

DeepSeek V4 Pro vs GLM 5.3

Pricing, context window and real answers (August 2026)

DeepSeek V4 Pro (DeepSeek) and GLM 5.3 (Z.ai), compared as you can actually call them on FastMetal. Both are served from the same OpenAI-compatible endpoint and API key; switching is a change to the model string.

Specs and pricing

deepseek logoDeepSeek V4 Proz-ai logoGLM 5.3
ProviderDeepSeekZ.ai
Input (per 1M tokens)¥341.32¥250.18
Output (per 1M tokens)¥684.42¥786.28
Typical cost (1,000 in + 500 out tokens × 1,000 calls)¥684¥643
Context window1,048,576 tokens1,048,576 tokens
Release date4/24/20268/18/2026
Input modalitiestexttext
Arena · overall#49 · ELO 1,457Unranked
Arena · Japanese#18 · ELO 1,462Unranked
Arena · coding#54 · ELO 1,502Unranked

Prices are FastMetal's yen rates before tax. Arena ranks are as of the latest leaderboard scrape.

Which should you pick?

  • On price, DeepSeek V4 Pro: ¥684.42 per 1M output tokens, 13% less than GLM 5.3.
  • If in doubt, try both on the same key. Switching is a change to the model string, and each is billed at its own rate.

Real answers to the same prompts

Exactly what the FastMetal gateway returned, side by side. Not benchmark scores: actual output.

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'. Explain your reasoning step by step.

DeepSeek V4 Pro

The word is "strawberry". Let's count the occurrences of the letter 'r' step by step: 1. Write the word: s t r a w b e r r y 2. Examine each character: - s: not an 'r' - t: not an 'r' - r: is an 'r' → count 1 - a: not an 'r' - w: not an 'r' - b: not an 'r' - e: not an 'r' - r: is an 'r' → count 2 - r: is an 'r' → count 3 - y: not an 'r' 3. Total number of 'r's = 3. Therefore, there are **3** 'r's in "strawberry".
7.3s1136 output tokens

GLM 5.3

# Counting 'r's in "strawberry" **Step 1: Spell out the word letter by letter.** s - t - r - a - w - b - e - r - r - y **Step 2: Go through each letter and mark the 'r's.** | Position | Letter | Is it 'r'? | |----------|--------|------------| | 1 | s | No | | 2 | t | No | | 3 | **r** | ✅ Yes (1st) | | 4 | a | No | | 5 | w | No | | 6 | b | No | | 7 | e | No | | 8 | **r** | ✅ Yes (2nd) | | 9 | **r** | ✅ Yes (3rd) | | 10 | y | No | **Step 3: Tally the results.** - 1st 'r' in "st**r**awberry" - 2nd 'r' in "strawbe**r**ry" - 3rd 'r' in "strawber**r**y" ## Answer: There are **3** 'r's in "strawberry." (Note: two of them appear together in the "rr" near the end, which is easy to miss when c…
5.8s493 output tokens

Debug This Error

I'm getting the following error in my Node.js application: TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map') at UserList (/app/components/UserList.js:12:25) at renderWithHooks (/app/node_modules/rea…

DeepSeek V4 Pro

The error is occurring because `users` is `undefined` when the component renders, and you're trying to call `.map()` on it. This typically happens when the data hasn't been loaded yet or wasn't passed correctly to the component. ## Here are several ways to fix this: ### 1. **Add a default value with empty array (Simplest fix)** ```javascript function UserList({ users = [] }) { return ( <ul> {users.map(user => <li key={user.id}>{user.name}</li>)} </ul> ); } ``` ### 2. **Add a conditional check** ```javascript function UserList({ users }) { if (!users) { return <div>No users found</div>; } return ( <ul> {users.map(user => <li key={user.id}>{user.name}<…
6.9s442 output tokens

GLM 5.3

## What's happening The error means `users` is `undefined` when the component renders. `undefined` doesn't have a `.map()` method, so JavaScript throws a `TypeError`. Since destructured props that aren't passed default to `undefined`, something upstream isn't providing the value you expect. ## Common causes 1. **The parent doesn't pass the prop, or uses a different name:** ```jsx <UserList /> {/* missing users */} <UserList userList={users} /> {/* prop name mismatch */} ``` 2. **Async data hasn't loaded yet** — the component renders before an API call completes, and the initial value is `undefined`: ```jsx const [users, setUsers] = useState(); // undefin…
17.1s1345 output tokens

Code Review

Please review the following Python function and suggest improvements for readability, performance, and best practices: def get_data(url, retries=3): import requests import time for i in range(retries):…

DeepSeek V4 Pro

Here’s a review of your `get_data` function, highlighting issues and suggesting improvements. ## Overall Observations - The function works but has several readability, robustness, and maintainability issues. - Imports are inside the function, bare `except` hides errors, and the filtering logic is not Pythonic. - No type hints or docstring, making it harder to use and understand. ## Specific Improvements ### 1. Move Imports to the Top of the Module **Why:** Imports inside a function are executed every time the function is called, which is slightly slower and violates PEP 8 style guidelines. **Before:** ```python def get_data(url, retries=3): import requests import time # ... `…
40.5s2277 output tokens

GLM 5.3

Here's a breakdown of the issues, followed by a refactored version. ## Readability - **Move imports to module level.** PEP 8 requires top-level imports; importing inside a function hides dependencies and adds overhead on every call (small, but pointless). - **`item["active"] == True`** → just `item.get("active")`. Comparing to `True` with `==` is flagged by PEP 8, and `.get()` avoids a `KeyError` if the key is missing. - **Use a list comprehension** instead of initializing a list and appending in a loop. - **Rename things.** `get_data` doesn't say what it does (`fetch_active_items`?), and `response` beats `r`. Use `_` for the unused loop counter. - **Magic numbers** (`2`, `10`) should be n…
75.0s6434 output tokens

Compare on more prompts →

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4 Pro or GLM 5.3?
Per 1M output tokens, DeepSeek V4 Pro is ¥684.42 and GLM 5.3 is ¥786.28 on FastMetal (yen, before tax), so DeepSeek V4 Pro is cheaper.
How do the context windows of DeepSeek V4 Pro and GLM 5.3 compare?
DeepSeek V4 Pro takes 1,048,576 tokens; GLM 5.3 takes 1,048,576.
Can I use DeepSeek V4 Pro and GLM 5.3 with the same API key?
Yes. On FastMetal's OpenAI-compatible endpoint, switch by passing "deepseek-v4-pro" or "glm-5.3" as the model. Each is billed at its own rate from the same prepaid balance.

Try both on one API key

Create an account and add credit to call DeepSeek V4 Pro and GLM 5.3 from the browser chat and the API. No monthly fee.

More comparisons with DeepSeek V4 Pro

More comparisons with GLM 5.3