Model comparison

DeepSeek V4 Flash vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Pricing, context window and real answers (September 2026)

DeepSeek V4 Flash (DeepSeek) and MiMo-V2.6-Flash (Xiaomi), compared as you can actually call them on FastMetal. Both are served from the same OpenAI-compatible endpoint and API key; switching is a change to the model string.

Specs and pricing

deepseek logoDeepSeek V4 FlashMiMo-V2.6-Flash
ProviderDeepSeekXiaomi
Input (per 1M tokens)¥24.61¥25.02
Output (per 1M tokens)¥49.21¥50.04
Typical cost (1,000 in + 500 out tokens × 1,000 calls)¥49¥50
Context window1,048,576 tokens1,048,576 tokens
Release date4/24/20269/21/2026
Input modalitiestexttext, image, video, audio
Throughput (p50)
Arena · overall#92 · ELO 1,436Unranked
Arena · Japanese#78 · ELO 1,396Unranked
Arena · coding#92 · ELO 1,483Unranked

Prices are FastMetal's yen rates before tax. Arena ranks are as of the latest leaderboard scrape.

Which should you pick?

  • On price, DeepSeek V4 Flash: ¥49.21 per 1M output tokens, 2% less than MiMo-V2.6-Flash.
  • If in doubt, try both on the same key. Switching is a change to the model string, and each is billed at its own rate.

Real answers to the same prompts

Exactly what the FastMetal gateway returned, side by side. Not benchmark scores: actual output.

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'. Explain your reasoning step by step.

DeepSeek V4 Flash

The word "strawberry" is spelled as s-t-r-a-w-b-e-r-r-y. I go through each letter: s (no), t (no), r (yes, first), a (no), w (no), b (no), e (no), r (yes, second), r (yes, third), y (no). Thus, there are three 'r's.
3.9s251 output tokens

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

## Counting the 'r's in 'strawberry' **Step 1: Write out each letter of the word individually:** `s - t - r - a - w - b - e - r - r - y` **Step 2: Go through each letter one by one and check if it's an 'r':** | Position | Letter | Is it 'r'? | Running Count | |----------|--------|------------|---------------| | 1 | s | ❌ | 0 | | 2 | t | ❌ | 0 | | 3 | **r** | ✅ | **1** | | 4 | a | ❌ | 1 | | 5 | w | ❌ | 1 | | 6 | b | ❌ | 1 | | 7 | e | ❌ | 1 | | 8 | **r** | ✅ | **2** | | 9 | **r** | ✅ | **3** | | 10 | y | ❌ | 3 | **Answer: There are 3 'r's in 'strawberry'.** 🍓 The first 'r' appears at position 3 (after "st"), and the remaining two are the double 'rr' near the end of the word.
6.5s379 output tokens

Debug This Error

I'm getting the following error in my Node.js application: TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map') at UserList (/app/components/UserList.js:12:25) at renderWithHooks (/app/node_modules/rea…

DeepSeek V4 Flash

The error occurs because `users` is `undefined` when the component tries to call `.map()` on it. ## Why this happens Your component expects `users` to be an array, but it's receiving `undefined` as a prop. This typically happens when: 1. The parent component doesn't pass the `users` prop 2. The data fetching hasn't completed yet (async data loading) 3. The API response is missing the expected data structure ## How to fix it ### Option 1: Default prop value (Recommended for initial state) ```jsx function UserList({ users = [] }) { return ( <ul> {users.map(user => <li key={user.id}>{user.name}</li>)} </ul> ); } ``` ### Option 2: Guard clause (More explicit) ```jsx func…
6.3s422 output tokens

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

## Cause of the Error The error occurs because the `users` prop is `undefined` when the component first renders. When you try to call `.map()` on `undefined`, it throws: ``` TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map') ``` This typically happens when: 1. The **parent component** hasn't passed `users` yet (e.g., data is still loading from an API) 2. The prop name **doesn't match** between parent and child 3. The prop is **intentionally optional** but used unconditionally ## Fixes ### 1. Default parameter value (simplest fix) Set a default value for `users` so it's always an array: ```js function UserList({ users = [] }) { return ( <ul> {users.map(user =>…
7.6s547 output tokens

Code Review

Please review the following Python function and suggest improvements for readability, performance, and best practices: def get_data(url, retries=3): import requests import time for i in range(retries):…

DeepSeek V4 Flash

Here's a comprehensive review with suggested improvements: ## Issues Identified: 1. **Import at wrong location** - Imports inside functions are inefficient and non-standard 2. **Bare `except:` clause** - Catches all exceptions including `KeyboardInterrupt`, `SystemExit` 3. **Missing error handling granularity** - Should distinguish between retryable and non-retryable errors 4. **Duplicate sleep logic** - Same sleep in `else` and `except` blocks 5. **Unnecessary variable** - `data` is only used once 6. **Inefficient list building** - Manual loop instead of list comprehension 7. **Hardcoded error message** - No logging or error context 8. **Missing type hints** - No type annotations 9. **Fun…
12.6s987 output tokens

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

# Code Review: `get_data` ## Issues Identified | Category | Issue | |----------|-------| | **Readability** | Imports inside function, vague names (`i`, `r`), no docstring/type hints | | **Performance** | Manual loop instead of list comprehension, no `requests.Session` (no connection reuse) | | **Best Practices** | Bare `except`, `== True`, silent failures, no backoff, no error propagation | --- ## Improved Version ```python import time import logging import requests from typing import Optional logger = logging.getLogger(__name__) def get_data( url: str, retries: int = 3, timeout: float = 10, backoff_factor: float = 2.0, ) -> Optional[list[dict]]: """ Fetch dat…
18.9s1208 output tokens

Compare on more prompts →

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4 Flash or MiMo-V2.6-Flash?
Per 1M output tokens, DeepSeek V4 Flash is ¥49.21 and MiMo-V2.6-Flash is ¥50.04 on FastMetal (yen, before tax), so DeepSeek V4 Flash is cheaper.
How do the context windows of DeepSeek V4 Flash and MiMo-V2.6-Flash compare?
DeepSeek V4 Flash takes 1,048,576 tokens; MiMo-V2.6-Flash takes 1,048,576.
Can I use DeepSeek V4 Flash and MiMo-V2.6-Flash with the same API key?
Yes. On FastMetal's OpenAI-compatible endpoint, switch by passing "deepseek-v4-flash" or "mimo-v2.6-flash" as the model. Each is billed at its own rate from the same prepaid balance.

Try both on one API key

Create an account and add credit to call DeepSeek V4 Flash and MiMo-V2.6-Flash from the browser chat and the API. No monthly fee.

More comparisons with DeepSeek V4 Flash

More comparisons with MiMo-V2.6-Flash