Model comparison

Claude Fable 5.1 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash

Pricing, context window and real answers (September 2026)

Claude Fable 5.1 (Anthropic) and DeepSeek V4 Flash (DeepSeek), compared as you can actually call them on FastMetal. Both are served from the same OpenAI-compatible endpoint and API key; switching is a change to the model string.

Specs and pricing

anthropic logoClaude Fable 5.1deepseek logoDeepSeek V4 Flash
ProviderAnthropicDeepSeek
Input (per 1M tokens)¥1,787¥22.85
Output (per 1M tokens)¥8,935¥49.21
Typical cost (1,000 in + 500 out tokens × 1,000 calls)¥6,255¥47
Context window1,000,000 tokens1,048,576 tokens
Release date9/1/20264/24/2026
Input modalitiestext, image, filetext
Arena · overall#3 · ELO 1,504#91 · ELO 1,436
Arena · JapaneseUnranked#75 · ELO 1,397
Arena · coding#34 · ELO 1,517#90 · ELO 1,483

Prices are FastMetal's yen rates before tax. Arena ranks are as of the latest leaderboard scrape.

Which should you pick?

  • On price, DeepSeek V4 Flash: ¥49.21 per 1M output tokens, 99% less than Claude Fable 5.1.
  • On the Overall arena board, Claude Fable 5.1 ranks higher (#3; DeepSeek V4 Flash is #91).
  • On the Coding arena board, Claude Fable 5.1 ranks higher (#34; DeepSeek V4 Flash is #90).
  • For long documents, DeepSeek V4 Flash: a 1,048,576-token context window against 1,000,000 for Claude Fable 5.1.
  • If in doubt, try both on the same key. Switching is a change to the model string, and each is billed at its own rate.

Real answers to the same prompts

Exactly what the FastMetal gateway returned, side by side. Not benchmark scores: actual output.

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'. Explain your reasoning step by step.

Claude Fable 5.1

**Step 1: Write out the word letter by letter.** s - t - r - a - w - b - e - r - r - y **Step 2: Number each position.** 1. s 2. t 3. **r** 4. a 5. w 6. b 7. e 8. **r** 9. **r** 10. y **Step 3: Identify which positions contain 'r'.** - Position 3: r (in "str-") - Position 8: r (in "-ber-") - Position 9: r (in "-rry") **Step 4: Count them.** 3 + 1 + 1 = **3** **Answer: There are 3 'r's in "strawberry."** A helpful way to check: split the word into its parts — "straw" (1 r) + "berry" (2 r's) = 3 r's total.
7.9s259 output tokens

DeepSeek V4 Flash

The word "strawberry" is spelled as s-t-r-a-w-b-e-r-r-y. I go through each letter: s (no), t (no), r (yes, first), a (no), w (no), b (no), e (no), r (yes, second), r (yes, third), y (no). Thus, there are three 'r's.
3.9s251 output tokens

Debug This Error

I'm getting the following error in my Node.js application: TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map') at UserList (/app/components/UserList.js:12:25) at renderWithHooks (/app/node_modules/rea…

Claude Fable 5.1

The error means that when `UserList` rendered, the `users` prop was `undefined`, so calling `.map()` on it failed. This typically happens because: 1. **The parent isn't passing the prop** (or misspelled it, e.g. `<UserList user={...} />`), or 2. **The data hasn't loaded yet.** A common pattern is fetching users in a `useEffect` and storing them in state whose initial value is `undefined` (e.g. `useState()`), so the first render happens before the data arrives. **Fixes** Give the prop a default value so the component is safe to render with no data: ```jsx function UserList({ users = [] }) { return ( <ul> {users.map(user => <li key={user.id}>{user.name}</li>)} </ul> ); }…
10.8s564 output tokens

DeepSeek V4 Flash

The error occurs because `users` is `undefined` when the component tries to call `.map()` on it. ## Why this happens Your component expects `users` to be an array, but it's receiving `undefined` as a prop. This typically happens when: 1. The parent component doesn't pass the `users` prop 2. The data fetching hasn't completed yet (async data loading) 3. The API response is missing the expected data structure ## How to fix it ### Option 1: Default prop value (Recommended for initial state) ```jsx function UserList({ users = [] }) { return ( <ul> {users.map(user => <li key={user.id}>{user.name}</li>)} </ul> ); } ``` ### Option 2: Guard clause (More explicit) ```jsx func…
6.3s422 output tokens

Code Review

Please review the following Python function and suggest improvements for readability, performance, and best practices: def get_data(url, retries=3): import requests import time for i in range(retries):…

Claude Fable 5.1

Here's a review of the function organized by category, followed by a refactored version. ## Issues ### Correctness / robustness 1. **Bare `except:`** — This catches *everything*, including `KeyboardInterrupt`, `SystemExit`, and bugs like `KeyError` from `item["active"]`. A malformed response would be silently retried three times and then swallowed. Catch `requests.RequestException` (and `ValueError` for bad JSON) specifically. 2. **Retrying non-retryable errors** — A 404 or 400 will never succeed on retry. Only retry on transient failures (timeouts, connection errors, 5xx, 429). 3. **Silent failure** — Returning `[]` after exhausting retries is indistinguishable from "the endpoint legitima…
27.7s2028 output tokens

DeepSeek V4 Flash

Here's a comprehensive review with suggested improvements: ## Issues Identified: 1. **Import at wrong location** - Imports inside functions are inefficient and non-standard 2. **Bare `except:` clause** - Catches all exceptions including `KeyboardInterrupt`, `SystemExit` 3. **Missing error handling granularity** - Should distinguish between retryable and non-retryable errors 4. **Duplicate sleep logic** - Same sleep in `else` and `except` blocks 5. **Unnecessary variable** - `data` is only used once 6. **Inefficient list building** - Manual loop instead of list comprehension 7. **Hardcoded error message** - No logging or error context 8. **Missing type hints** - No type annotations 9. **Fun…
12.6s987 output tokens

Compare on more prompts →

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5.1 or DeepSeek V4 Flash?
Per 1M output tokens, Claude Fable 5.1 is ¥8,935 and DeepSeek V4 Flash is ¥49.21 on FastMetal (yen, before tax), so DeepSeek V4 Flash is cheaper.
How do the context windows of Claude Fable 5.1 and DeepSeek V4 Flash compare?
Claude Fable 5.1 takes 1,000,000 tokens; DeepSeek V4 Flash takes 1,048,576.
Which ranks higher, Claude Fable 5.1 or DeepSeek V4 Flash?
Claude Fable 5.1 ranks higher on the public arena (Claude Fable 5.1 #3, DeepSeek V4 Flash #75). Ranks move as the leaderboard updates.
Can I use Claude Fable 5.1 and DeepSeek V4 Flash with the same API key?
Yes. On FastMetal's OpenAI-compatible endpoint, switch by passing "anthropic-claude-fable-5-1" or "deepseek-v4-flash" as the model. Each is billed at its own rate from the same prepaid balance.

Try both on one API key

Create an account and add credit to call Claude Fable 5.1 and DeepSeek V4 Flash from the browser chat and the API. No monthly fee.

More comparisons with Claude Fable 5.1

More comparisons with DeepSeek V4 Flash