Model comparison

Claude Fable 5 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash

Pricing, context window and real answers (August 2026)

Claude Fable 5 (Anthropic) and DeepSeek V4 Flash (DeepSeek), compared as you can actually call them on FastMetal. Both are served from the same OpenAI-compatible endpoint and API key; switching is a change to the model string.

Specs and pricing

anthropic logoClaude Fable 5deepseek logoDeepSeek V4 Flash
ProviderAnthropicDeepSeek
Input (per 1M tokens)¥1,787¥16.08
Output (per 1M tokens)¥8,935¥32.17
Typical cost (1,000 in + 500 out tokens × 1,000 calls)¥6,255¥32
Context window1,000,000 tokens1,048,576 tokens
Release date6/9/20264/24/2026
Input modalitiestext, image, filetext
Arena · overall#1 · ELO 1,508#79 · ELO 1,436
Arena · Japanese#1 · ELO 1,529#67 · ELO 1,390
Arena · coding#2 · ELO 1,552#80 · ELO 1,484

Prices are FastMetal's yen rates before tax. Arena ranks are as of the latest leaderboard scrape.

Which should you pick?

  • On price, DeepSeek V4 Flash: ¥32.17 per 1M output tokens, 100% less than Claude Fable 5.
  • On the Overall arena board, Claude Fable 5 ranks higher (#1; DeepSeek V4 Flash is #79).
  • On the Japanese arena board, Claude Fable 5 ranks higher (#1; DeepSeek V4 Flash is #67).
  • On the Coding arena board, Claude Fable 5 ranks higher (#2; DeepSeek V4 Flash is #80).
  • For long documents, DeepSeek V4 Flash: a 1,048,576-token context window against 1,000,000 for Claude Fable 5.
  • If in doubt, try both on the same key. Switching is a change to the model string, and each is billed at its own rate.

Real answers to the same prompts

Exactly what the FastMetal gateway returned, side by side. Not benchmark scores: actual output.

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'. Explain your reasoning step by step.

Claude Fable 5

# Counting 'r's in "strawberry" Let me spell out the word letter by letter and check each one: | Position | Letter | Is it 'r'? | |----------|--------|------------| | 1 | s | No | | 2 | t | No | | 3 | **r** | ✅ Yes (1st) | | 4 | a | No | | 5 | w | No | | 6 | b | No | | 7 | e | No | | 8 | **r** | ✅ Yes (2nd) | | 9 | **r** | ✅ Yes (3rd) | | 10 | y | No | ## Reasoning breakdown: - The word "strawberry" can be split into two parts: **straw** + **berry** - "straw" contains one 'r': st**r**aw - "berry" contains two 'r's: be**rr**y (a double-r) ## Answer: **3** There are **three 'r's** in "strawberry."
39.6s354 output tokens

DeepSeek V4 Flash

The word "strawberry" is spelled as s-t-r-a-w-b-e-r-r-y. I go through each letter: s (no), t (no), r (yes, first), a (no), w (no), b (no), e (no), r (yes, second), r (yes, third), y (no). Thus, there are three 'r's.
3.9s251 output tokens

Debug This Error

I'm getting the following error in my Node.js application: TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map') at UserList (/app/components/UserList.js:12:25) at renderWithHooks (/app/node_modules/rea…

Claude Fable 5

## Cause The error means that when `UserList` renders, the `users` prop is `undefined`, so calling `.map()` on it fails. This typically happens for one of these reasons: 1. **The parent isn't passing the prop** (or has a typo in the prop name): ```jsx <UserList /> // users is undefined <UserList user={users} /> // typo: "user" instead of "users" ``` 2. **Data is fetched asynchronously** — the component renders before the API call finishes, and the initial state is `undefined`: ```jsx const [users, setUsers] = useState(); // undefined initially! ``` ## Fixes **Option 1: Default parameter value** (quick fix) ```jsx function UserList({ users = [] }) { re…
51.3s686 output tokens

DeepSeek V4 Flash

The error occurs because `users` is `undefined` when the component tries to call `.map()` on it. ## Why this happens Your component expects `users` to be an array, but it's receiving `undefined` as a prop. This typically happens when: 1. The parent component doesn't pass the `users` prop 2. The data fetching hasn't completed yet (async data loading) 3. The API response is missing the expected data structure ## How to fix it ### Option 1: Default prop value (Recommended for initial state) ```jsx function UserList({ users = [] }) { return ( <ul> {users.map(user => <li key={user.id}>{user.name}</li>)} </ul> ); } ``` ### Option 2: Guard clause (More explicit) ```jsx func…
6.3s422 output tokens

Code Review

Please review the following Python function and suggest improvements for readability, performance, and best practices: def get_data(url, retries=3): import requests import time for i in range(retries):…

Claude Fable 5

# Code Review Your function works, but there are several issues worth addressing. Here's a breakdown by category: ## Issues Found ### 1. **Bare `except:` clause (critical)** This catches *everything*, including `KeyboardInterrupt`, `SystemExit`, and bugs like `KeyError` or `TypeError` in your own parsing code. You'll silently retry on programming errors and mask real problems. ### 2. **Imports inside the function** Imports belong at module level (PEP 8). Function-level imports add overhead on each call and hide dependencies. ### 3. **`== True` comparison** Use truthiness directly: `if item["active"]:` (PEP 8 explicitly recommends this). ### 4. **Silent failures** Returning `[]` on fail…
38.5s1528 output tokens

DeepSeek V4 Flash

Here's a comprehensive review with suggested improvements: ## Issues Identified: 1. **Import at wrong location** - Imports inside functions are inefficient and non-standard 2. **Bare `except:` clause** - Catches all exceptions including `KeyboardInterrupt`, `SystemExit` 3. **Missing error handling granularity** - Should distinguish between retryable and non-retryable errors 4. **Duplicate sleep logic** - Same sleep in `else` and `except` blocks 5. **Unnecessary variable** - `data` is only used once 6. **Inefficient list building** - Manual loop instead of list comprehension 7. **Hardcoded error message** - No logging or error context 8. **Missing type hints** - No type annotations 9. **Fun…
12.6s987 output tokens

Compare on more prompts →

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5 or DeepSeek V4 Flash?
Per 1M output tokens, Claude Fable 5 is ¥8,935 and DeepSeek V4 Flash is ¥32.17 on FastMetal (yen, before tax), so DeepSeek V4 Flash is cheaper.
How do the context windows of Claude Fable 5 and DeepSeek V4 Flash compare?
Claude Fable 5 takes 1,000,000 tokens; DeepSeek V4 Flash takes 1,048,576.
Which ranks higher, Claude Fable 5 or DeepSeek V4 Flash?
Claude Fable 5 ranks higher on the public arena (Claude Fable 5 #1, DeepSeek V4 Flash #67). Ranks move as the leaderboard updates.
Can I use Claude Fable 5 and DeepSeek V4 Flash with the same API key?
Yes. On FastMetal's OpenAI-compatible endpoint, switch by passing "anthropic-claude-fable-5" or "deepseek-v4-flash" as the model. Each is billed at its own rate from the same prepaid balance.

Try both on one API key

Create an account and add credit to call Claude Fable 5 and DeepSeek V4 Flash from the browser chat and the API. No monthly fee.

More comparisons with Claude Fable 5

More comparisons with DeepSeek V4 Flash