Model comparison

Claude Sonnet 5 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash

Pricing, context window and real answers (August 2026)

Claude Sonnet 5 (Anthropic) and DeepSeek V4 Flash (DeepSeek), compared as you can actually call them on FastMetal. Both are served from the same OpenAI-compatible endpoint and API key; switching is a change to the model string.

Specs and pricing

anthropic logoClaude Sonnet 5deepseek logoDeepSeek V4 Flash
ProviderAnthropicDeepSeek
Input (per 1M tokens)¥357.4¥16.08
Output (per 1M tokens)¥1,787¥32.17
Typical cost (1,000 in + 500 out tokens × 1,000 calls)¥1,251¥32
Context window1,000,000 tokens1,048,576 tokens
Release date6/30/20264/24/2026
Input modalitiestext, image, filetext
Arena · overall#44 · ELO 1,460#79 · ELO 1,436
Arena · Japanese#14 · ELO 1,469#67 · ELO 1,390
Arena · coding#19 · ELO 1,522#80 · ELO 1,484

Prices are FastMetal's yen rates before tax. Arena ranks are as of the latest leaderboard scrape.

Which should you pick?

  • On price, DeepSeek V4 Flash: ¥32.17 per 1M output tokens, 98% less than Claude Sonnet 5.
  • On the Overall arena board, Claude Sonnet 5 ranks higher (#44; DeepSeek V4 Flash is #79).
  • On the Japanese arena board, Claude Sonnet 5 ranks higher (#14; DeepSeek V4 Flash is #67).
  • On the Coding arena board, Claude Sonnet 5 ranks higher (#19; DeepSeek V4 Flash is #80).
  • For long documents, DeepSeek V4 Flash: a 1,048,576-token context window against 1,000,000 for Claude Sonnet 5.
  • If in doubt, try both on the same key. Switching is a change to the model string, and each is billed at its own rate.

Real answers to the same prompts

Exactly what the FastMetal gateway returned, side by side. Not benchmark scores: actual output.

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'. Explain your reasoning step by step.

Claude Sonnet 5

# Counting 'r's in "strawberry" **Step 1: Spell out the word letter by letter** s - t - r - a - w - b - e - r - r - y **Step 2: Number each letter position** | Position | Letter | |----------|--------| | 1 | s | | 2 | t | | 3 | **r** | | 4 | a | | 5 | w | | 6 | b | | 7 | e | | 8 | **r** | | 9 | **r** | | 10 | y | **Step 3: Identify and count the 'r's** - Position 3: **r** ✓ (1st r) - Position 8: **r** ✓ (2nd r) - Position 9: **r** ✓ (3rd r) **Answer: There are 3 r's in "strawberry"**
5.9s405 output tokens

DeepSeek V4 Flash

The word "strawberry" is spelled as s-t-r-a-w-b-e-r-r-y. I go through each letter: s (no), t (no), r (yes, first), a (no), w (no), b (no), e (no), r (yes, second), r (yes, third), y (no). Thus, there are three 'r's.
3.9s251 output tokens

Debug This Error

I'm getting the following error in my Node.js application: TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map') at UserList (/app/components/UserList.js:12:25) at renderWithHooks (/app/node_modules/rea…

Claude Sonnet 5

# Root Cause The `UserList` component receives `users` as a prop, but at the time it's rendered, `users` is `undefined` — not an empty array, but literally missing. When your code tries to call `.map()` on `undefined`, JavaScript throws that `TypeError`. This typically happens when: - The parent component hasn't fetched the data yet (e.g., an API call is still in progress) - The prop name doesn't match what's being passed down (typo) - The data source (API/state) genuinely returns `undefined` in some case # Fixes **1. Add a default prop value (quick fix)** ```jsx function UserList({ users = [] }) { return ( <ul> {users.map(user => <li key={user.id}>{user.name}</li>)} </u…
8.8s750 output tokens

DeepSeek V4 Flash

The error occurs because `users` is `undefined` when the component tries to call `.map()` on it. ## Why this happens Your component expects `users` to be an array, but it's receiving `undefined` as a prop. This typically happens when: 1. The parent component doesn't pass the `users` prop 2. The data fetching hasn't completed yet (async data loading) 3. The API response is missing the expected data structure ## How to fix it ### Option 1: Default prop value (Recommended for initial state) ```jsx function UserList({ users = [] }) { return ( <ul> {users.map(user => <li key={user.id}>{user.name}</li>)} </ul> ); } ``` ### Option 2: Guard clause (More explicit) ```jsx func…
6.3s422 output tokens

Code Review

Please review the following Python function and suggest improvements for readability, performance, and best practices: def get_data(url, retries=3): import requests import time for i in range(retries):…

Claude Sonnet 5

## Review of `get_data` Function Here's an improved version followed by an explanation of the changes: ```python import logging import time from typing import Any import requests logger = logging.getLogger(__name__) def get_data( url: str, retries: int = 3, timeout: float = 10.0, backoff_factor: float = 2.0, ) -> list[dict[str, Any]]: """ Fetch active items from the given URL. Args: url: The endpoint to fetch data from. retries: Number of attempts before giving up. timeout: Request timeout in seconds. backoff_factor: Multiplier for exponential backoff between retries. Returns: A list of dicts with "name" and "id"…
14.0s1299 output tokens

DeepSeek V4 Flash

Here's a comprehensive review with suggested improvements: ## Issues Identified: 1. **Import at wrong location** - Imports inside functions are inefficient and non-standard 2. **Bare `except:` clause** - Catches all exceptions including `KeyboardInterrupt`, `SystemExit` 3. **Missing error handling granularity** - Should distinguish between retryable and non-retryable errors 4. **Duplicate sleep logic** - Same sleep in `else` and `except` blocks 5. **Unnecessary variable** - `data` is only used once 6. **Inefficient list building** - Manual loop instead of list comprehension 7. **Hardcoded error message** - No logging or error context 8. **Missing type hints** - No type annotations 9. **Fun…
12.6s987 output tokens

Compare on more prompts →

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 5 or DeepSeek V4 Flash?
Per 1M output tokens, Claude Sonnet 5 is ¥1,787 and DeepSeek V4 Flash is ¥32.17 on FastMetal (yen, before tax), so DeepSeek V4 Flash is cheaper.
How do the context windows of Claude Sonnet 5 and DeepSeek V4 Flash compare?
Claude Sonnet 5 takes 1,000,000 tokens; DeepSeek V4 Flash takes 1,048,576.
Which ranks higher, Claude Sonnet 5 or DeepSeek V4 Flash?
Claude Sonnet 5 ranks higher on the public arena (Claude Sonnet 5 #14, DeepSeek V4 Flash #67). Ranks move as the leaderboard updates.
Can I use Claude Sonnet 5 and DeepSeek V4 Flash with the same API key?
Yes. On FastMetal's OpenAI-compatible endpoint, switch by passing "anthropic-claude-sonnet-5" or "deepseek-v4-flash" as the model. Each is billed at its own rate from the same prepaid balance.

Try both on one API key

Create an account and add credit to call Claude Sonnet 5 and DeepSeek V4 Flash from the browser chat and the API. No monthly fee.

More comparisons with Claude Sonnet 5

More comparisons with DeepSeek V4 Flash