Model comparison

Beam 1.0 501B A23B vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro

Pricing, context window and real answers (October 2026)

Beam 1.0 501B A23B (Reflection AI) and MiMo-V2.6-Pro (Xiaomi), compared as you can actually call them on FastMetal. Both are served from the same OpenAI-compatible endpoint and API key; switching is a change to the model string.

Specs and pricing

Beam 1.0 501B A23BMiMo-V2.6-Pro
ProviderReflection AIXiaomi
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.422$0.459
Output (per 1M tokens)$1.27$0.9179
Typical cost (1,000 in + 500 out tokens × 1,000 calls)$1.06$0.9179
Context window1,048,576 tokens1,048,576 tokens
Release date10/16/20269/21/2026
Input modalitiestexttext, image, video, audio
Throughput (p50)—101 tokens/s (n=26)
Arena · overallUnranked#27 · ELO 1,479
Arena · JapaneseUnrankedUnranked
Arena · codingUnranked#13 · ELO 1,538

Prices are FastMetal's rates, before tax.

Rankings: LMArena leaderboard dataset (lmarena-ai/leaderboard-dataset), CC BY 4.0, snapshot 2026-10-15; category names mapped and ratings rounded by FastMetal.

Which should you pick?

  • On price, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: $0.9179 per 1M output tokens, 28% less than Beam 1.0 501B A23B.
  • If in doubt, try both on the same key. Switching is a change to the model string, and each is billed at its own rate.

Real answers to the same prompts

Exactly what the FastMetal gateway returned, side by side. Not benchmark scores: actual output.

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'. Explain your reasoning step by step.

Beam 1.0 501B A23B

The word “strawberry” is spelled: s - t - r - a - w - b - e - r - r - y The letter “r” appears in these positions: - s**r**awberry (1st r) - strawbe**r**ry (2nd r) - strawber**r**y (3rd r) Therefore, there are **3** r's in “strawberry.”
7.6s278 output tokens

MiMo-V2.6-Pro

# Counting the 'r's in "strawberry" ## Step 1: Spell out the word letter by letter | Position | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | |----------|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|----| | Letter | s | t | r | a | w | b | e | r | r | y | ## Step 2: Identify every 'r' - **Position 3** → **r** ✅ (1st 'r') - **Position 8** → **r** ✅ (2nd 'r') - **Position 9** → **r** ✅ (3rd 'r') All other letters (s, t, a, w, b, e, y) are not 'r'. ## Answer There are **3** 'r's in "strawberry."
22.0s327 output tokens

Debug This Error

I'm getting the following error in my Node.js application: TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map') at UserList (/app/components/UserList.js:12:25) at renderWithHooks (/app/node_modules/rea…

Beam 1.0 501B A23B

The error means `users` is `undefined` when `UserList` renders, so calling `.map` on `undefined` throws. ### Common causes 1. Parent renders `<UserList />` without a `users` prop. 2. Parent passes `users={data}` where `data` is still `undefined` (e.g., fetch not resolved). 3. Destructured prop name mismatch. ### Fixes **1. Default the prop** ```js function UserList({ users = [] }) { return ( <ul> {users.map(user => <li key={user.id}>{user.name}</li>)} </ul> ); } ``` **2. Guard in JSX** ```js {Array.isArray(users) && users.map(user => <li key={user.id}>{user.name}</li>)} ``` **3. Optional chaining** ```js {users?.map(user => <li key={user.id}>{user.name}</li>)} ``` Note…
12.8s414 output tokens

MiMo-V2.6-Pro

# Fixing `Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map')` ## The Problem The `users` prop is `undefined` when the component renders. This happens because `.map()` is being called on something that doesn't exist — JavaScript can't iterate over `undefined`. This typically occurs when: - The parent component doesn't pass the `users` prop at all - The data is still loading (e.g., from an API call) - A destructuring default doesn't exist ## The Fix ### Option 1: Provide a default value (simplest) ```jsx function UserList({ users = [] }) { return ( <ul> {users.map(user => <li key={user.id}>{user.name}</li>)} </ul> ); } ``` ### Option 2: Add a safety check with conditi…
32.9s575 output tokens

Code Review

Please review the following Python function and suggest improvements for readability, performance, and best practices: def get_data(url, retries=3): import requests import time for i in range(retries):…

Beam 1.0 501B A23B

Here are some key issues and improvements: ### Main issues in the original - **Imports inside the function** run on every call and hurt readability. - **Bare `except:`** catches `KeyboardInterrupt`, `SystemExit`, and programming errors. - **Retries every non-200 response**, including `404`/`400`, which usually should not be retried. - **`item["active"] == True`** can raise `KeyError` and is stricter than necessary unless you truly need exact boolean equality. - **Fixed sleep and unnecessary final sleep** before returning. - **Repeated `item["name"]` / `item["id"]`** lookups are slightly slower and less clean than a comprehension. - No handling/validation for malformed JSON or non-list respo…
16.8s1927 output tokens

MiMo-V2.6-Pro

# Code Review: `get_data` Function ## Issues Identified Here's my review organized by category, with a final improved version at the end. --- ### 🔴 Best Practices 1. **Imports inside the function** — `import requests` and `import time` are executed on *every* call. Move them to the top of the file (module-level). 2. **Bare `except:`** — This catches *everything*, including `KeyboardInterrupt` and `SystemExit`. Always catch specific exceptions. 3. **`== True` comparison** — Verbose and unnecessary. Use the object's truthiness directly. 4. **No logging** — Silent failures make debugging nearly impossible. 5. **Magic numbers** — `timeout=10` and `time.sleep(2)` are unexplained constan…
42.5s983 output tokens

Compare on more prompts →

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Beam 1.0 501B A23B or MiMo-V2.6-Pro?
Per 1M output tokens, Beam 1.0 501B A23B is $1.27 and MiMo-V2.6-Pro is $0.9179 on FastMetal (US dollars, before tax), so MiMo-V2.6-Pro is cheaper.
How do the context windows of Beam 1.0 501B A23B and MiMo-V2.6-Pro compare?
Beam 1.0 501B A23B takes 1,048,576 tokens; MiMo-V2.6-Pro takes 1,048,576.
Can I use Beam 1.0 501B A23B and MiMo-V2.6-Pro with the same API key?
Yes. On FastMetal's OpenAI-compatible endpoint, switch by passing "beam-1.0" or "mimo-v2.6-pro" as the model. Each is billed at its own rate from the same prepaid balance.

Try both on one API key

Create an account and add credit to call Beam 1.0 501B A23B and MiMo-V2.6-Pro from the browser chat and the API. No monthly fee.

More comparisons with Beam 1.0 501B A23B

More comparisons with MiMo-V2.6-Pro