MiniMax M2.7 vs Qwen3.8 Max
Pricing, context window and real answers (August 2026)
MiniMax M2.7 (MiniMax) and Qwen3.8 Max (Qwen), compared as you can actually call them on FastMetal. Both are served from the same OpenAI-compatible endpoint and API key; switching is a change to the model string.
Specs and pricing
| Provider | MiniMax | Qwen |
|---|---|---|
| Input (per 1M tokens) | ¥53.61 | ¥357.4 |
| Output (per 1M tokens) | ¥214.44 | ¥1,072.2 |
| Typical cost (1,000 in + 500 out tokens × 1,000 calls) | ¥161 | ¥894 |
| Context window | 204,800 tokens | 1,000,000 tokens |
| Release date | 3/18/2026 | 8/3/2026 |
| Input modalities | text | text, image |
| Arena · overall | #121 · ELO 1,417 | #20 · ELO 1,479 |
| Arena · Japanese | #166 · ELO 1,278 | #14 · ELO 1,485 |
| Arena · coding | #94 · ELO 1,481 | #26 · ELO 1,520 |
Prices are FastMetal's yen rates before tax. Arena ranks are as of the latest leaderboard scrape.
Which should you pick?
- On price, MiniMax M2.7: ¥214.44 per 1M output tokens, 80% less than Qwen3.8 Max.
- On the Overall arena board, Qwen3.8 Max ranks higher (#20; MiniMax M2.7 is #121).
- On the Japanese arena board, Qwen3.8 Max ranks higher (#14; MiniMax M2.7 is #166).
- On the Coding arena board, Qwen3.8 Max ranks higher (#26; MiniMax M2.7 is #94).
- For long documents, Qwen3.8 Max: a 1,000,000-token context window against 204,800 for MiniMax M2.7.
- If in doubt, try both on the same key. Switching is a change to the model string, and each is billed at its own rate.
Real answers to the same prompts
Exactly what the FastMetal gateway returned, side by side. Not benchmark scores: actual output.
Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'
Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'. Explain your reasoning step by step.
MiniMax M2.7
Qwen3.8 Max
Debug This Error
I'm getting the following error in my Node.js application: TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map') at UserList (/app/components/UserList.js:12:25) at renderWithHooks (/app/node_modules/rea…
MiniMax M2.7
Qwen3.8 Max
Professional Email
Write a professional email to a client explaining that the project delivery will be delayed by two weeks due to unexpected technical challenges discovered during integration testing. The tone should be apologetic but con…
MiniMax M2.7
Qwen3.8 Max
Frequently asked questions
- Which is cheaper, MiniMax M2.7 or Qwen3.8 Max?
- Per 1M output tokens, MiniMax M2.7 is ¥214.44 and Qwen3.8 Max is ¥1,072.2 on FastMetal (yen, before tax), so MiniMax M2.7 is cheaper.
- How do the context windows of MiniMax M2.7 and Qwen3.8 Max compare?
- MiniMax M2.7 takes 204,800 tokens; Qwen3.8 Max takes 1,000,000.
- Which ranks higher, MiniMax M2.7 or Qwen3.8 Max?
- Qwen3.8 Max ranks higher on the public arena (MiniMax M2.7 #166, Qwen3.8 Max #14). Ranks move as the leaderboard updates.
- Can I use MiniMax M2.7 and Qwen3.8 Max with the same API key?
- Yes. On FastMetal's OpenAI-compatible endpoint, switch by passing "minimax-m2.7" or "qwen3.8-max" as the model. Each is billed at its own rate from the same prepaid balance.
Try both on one API key
Create an account and add credit to call MiniMax M2.7 and Qwen3.8 Max from the browser chat and the API. No monthly fee.