FastMetal

Model comparison

GPT-6 Sol vs Kimi K3.1 Pro

Pricing, context window and real answers (October 2026)

GPT-6 Sol (OpenAI) and Kimi K3.1 Pro (Moonshot), compared as you can actually call them on FastMetal. Both are served from the same OpenAI-compatible endpoint and API key; switching is a change to the model string.

Specs and pricing

openai logoGPT-6 Solmoonshotai logoKimi K3.1 Pro
ProviderOpenAIMoonshot
Input (per 1M tokens)$2.11$2.11
Output (per 1M tokens)$10.55$10.55
Typical cost (1,000 in + 500 out tokens × 1,000 calls)$7.39$7.39
Context window1,050,000 tokens1,048,576 tokens
Release date9/22/202610/23/2026
Input modalitiesfile, image, texttext, image, video
Throughput (p50)99 tokens/s (n=24)—
Arena · overall#62 · ELO 1,459Unranked
Arena · Japanese#45 · ELO 1,443Unranked
Arena · coding#38 · ELO 1,519Unranked

Prices are FastMetal's rates, before tax.

Rankings: LMArena leaderboard dataset (lmarena-ai/leaderboard-dataset), CC BY 4.0, snapshot 2026-10-22; category names mapped and ratings rounded by FastMetal.

Which should you pick?

  • Output pricing is identical ($10.55 per 1M tokens).
  • For long documents, GPT-6 Sol: a 1,050,000-token context window against 1,048,576 for Kimi K3.1 Pro.
  • If in doubt, try both on the same key. Switching is a change to the model string, and each is billed at its own rate.

Real answers to the same prompts

Exactly what the FastMetal gateway returned, side by side. Not benchmark scores: actual output.

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'. Explain your reasoning step by step.

GPT-6 Sol

“Strawberry” is spelled **s-t-r-a-w-b-e-r-r-y**. There’s one **r** near the beginning and two near the end, for a total of **3**.
2.7s76 output tokens

Kimi K3.1 Pro

There are **3** ‘r’s in **“strawberry.”** 1. Write out each letter: **s – t – r – a – w – b – e – r – r – y** 2. Locate the ‘r’s: positions **3, 8, and 9**. 3. Count them: **1 + 1 + 1 = 3**.
11.3s

Debug This Error

I'm getting the following error in my Node.js application: TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map') at UserList (/app/components/UserList.js:12:25) at renderWithHooks (/app/node_modules/rea…

GPT-6 Sol

`users` is `undefined` when `UserList` renders, so calling `users.map(...)` throws the error. The component needs an array, but its parent may not be passing `users`, or the data may not have loaded yet. You can default it to an empty array: ```jsx function UserList({ users = [] }) { return ( <ul> {users.map(user => <li key={user.id}>{user.name}</li>)} </ul> ); } ``` Also check the parent component to make sure it passes an array: ```jsx <UserList users={users} /> ``` If `users` comes from an API, initialize its state as `[]` or show a loading state until the data arrives.
2.2s161 output tokens

Kimi K3.1 Pro

## What's causing the error The error means `users` is `undefined` when the component renders, and you can't call `.map()` on `undefined`. The component itself is fine — the problem is that whatever renders `<UserList />` either isn't passing the prop, or is passing a value that isn't an array yet. The most common cause is **async data fetching**: the parent renders `UserList` before the data has loaded. ```jsx function App() { const [users, setUsers] = useState(); // ❌ undefined on first render useEffect(() => { fetch('/api/users') .then(res => res.json()) .then(setUsers); }, []); return <UserList users={users} />; // users is undefined here initially } ``` On…
36.3s

Code Review

Please review the following Python function and suggest improvements for readability, performance, and best practices: def get_data(url, retries=3): import requests import time for i in range(retries):…

GPT-6 Sol

The main issues are the bare `except`, which hides errors such as malformed JSON, and retrying every non-200 response, including client errors that usually won’t improve with another attempt. The function also sleeps after its final attempt. ```python import time import requests def get_data(url, retries=3): if retries < 1: raise ValueError("retries must be at least 1") for attempt in range(retries): try: response = requests.get(url, timeout=10) except requests.RequestException: if attempt == retries - 1: raise else: # Retry rate limits and server errors, but not other client errors.…
10.3s814 output tokens

Kimi K3.1 Pro

The timeout and bounded retry loop are good starting points. The biggest issue is that failures—and even programming errors—are silently converted into retries and then `[]`. ### Suggested improvements - **Avoid bare `except:`**. It catches `KeyboardInterrupt`, `KeyError`, JSON/schema errors, and other bugs. Retry only expected transient network failures; let malformed responses fail visibly. - **Use a deliberate retry policy**. Retrying `401`, `403`, or `404` usually wastes time. Retry only transient statuses, use exponential backoff, and avoid sleeping after the final attempt. - **Do not use `[]` for both failure and no results**. Prefer raising the final exception so callers can disting…
560.2s

Compare on more prompts →

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, GPT-6 Sol or Kimi K3.1 Pro?
Both are $10.55 per 1M output tokens on FastMetal (US dollars, before tax).
How do the context windows of GPT-6 Sol and Kimi K3.1 Pro compare?
GPT-6 Sol takes 1,050,000 tokens; Kimi K3.1 Pro takes 1,048,576.
Can I use GPT-6 Sol and Kimi K3.1 Pro with the same API key?
Yes. On FastMetal's OpenAI-compatible endpoint, switch by passing "gpt-6-sol" or "kimi-k3.1-pro" as the model. Each is billed at its own rate from the same prepaid balance.

Try both on one API key

Create an account and add credit to call GPT-6 Sol and Kimi K3.1 Pro from the browser chat and the API. No monthly fee.

Create a free accountTry GPT-6 Sol in chatTry Kimi K3.1 Pro in chat

More comparisons with GPT-6 Sol

More comparisons with Kimi K3.1 Pro