GPT-5.6 Terra vs Qwen3.8 27B
Pricing, context window and real answers (August 2026)
GPT-5.6 Terra (OpenAI) and Qwen3.8 27B (Qwen), compared as you can actually call them on FastMetal. Both are served from the same OpenAI-compatible endpoint and API key; switching is a change to the model string.
Specs and pricing
| Provider | OpenAI | Qwen |
|---|---|---|
| Input (per 1M tokens) | ¥357.4 | ¥80.41 |
| Output (per 1M tokens) | ¥2,144.4 | ¥571.84 |
| Typical cost (1,000 in + 500 out tokens × 1,000 calls) | ¥1,430 | ¥366 |
| Context window | 1,050,000 tokens | 1,000,000 tokens |
| Release date | 7/9/2026 | 8/14/2026 |
| Input modalities | file, image, text | text, image, video |
| Arena · overall | #42 · ELO 1,466 | #87 · ELO 1,436 |
| Arena · Japanese | #19 · ELO 1,474 | Unranked |
| Arena · coding | #31 · ELO 1,519 | #67 · ELO 1,498 |
Prices are FastMetal's yen rates before tax. Arena ranks are as of the latest leaderboard scrape.
Which should you pick?
- On price, Qwen3.8 27B: ¥571.84 per 1M output tokens, 73% less than GPT-5.6 Terra.
- On the Overall arena board, GPT-5.6 Terra ranks higher (#42; Qwen3.8 27B is #87).
- On the Coding arena board, GPT-5.6 Terra ranks higher (#31; Qwen3.8 27B is #67).
- For long documents, GPT-5.6 Terra: a 1,050,000-token context window against 1,000,000 for Qwen3.8 27B.
- If in doubt, try both on the same key. Switching is a change to the model string, and each is billed at its own rate.
Real answers to the same prompts
Exactly what the FastMetal gateway returned, side by side. Not benchmark scores: actual output.
Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'
Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'. Explain your reasoning step by step.
GPT-5.6 Terra
Qwen3.8 27B
Debug This Error
I'm getting the following error in my Node.js application: TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map') at UserList (/app/components/UserList.js:12:25) at renderWithHooks (/app/node_modules/rea…
GPT-5.6 Terra
Qwen3.8 27B
Code Review
Please review the following Python function and suggest improvements for readability, performance, and best practices: def get_data(url, retries=3): import requests import time for i in range(retries):…
GPT-5.6 Terra
Qwen3.8 27B
Frequently asked questions
- Which is cheaper, GPT-5.6 Terra or Qwen3.8 27B?
- Per 1M output tokens, GPT-5.6 Terra is ¥2,144.4 and Qwen3.8 27B is ¥571.84 on FastMetal (yen, before tax), so Qwen3.8 27B is cheaper.
- How do the context windows of GPT-5.6 Terra and Qwen3.8 27B compare?
- GPT-5.6 Terra takes 1,050,000 tokens; Qwen3.8 27B takes 1,000,000.
- Which ranks higher, GPT-5.6 Terra or Qwen3.8 27B?
- GPT-5.6 Terra ranks higher on the public arena (GPT-5.6 Terra #19, Qwen3.8 27B #87). Ranks move as the leaderboard updates.
- Can I use GPT-5.6 Terra and Qwen3.8 27B with the same API key?
- Yes. On FastMetal's OpenAI-compatible endpoint, switch by passing "gpt-5.6-terra" or "qwen3.8-27b" as the model. Each is billed at its own rate from the same prepaid balance.
Try both on one API key
Create an account and add credit to call GPT-5.6 Terra and Qwen3.8 27B from the browser chat and the API. No monthly fee.