Model comparison

Claude Opus 4.8 vs GPT-5.6 Terra

Pricing, context window and real answers (August 2026)

Claude Opus 4.8 (Anthropic) and GPT-5.6 Terra (OpenAI), compared as you can actually call them on FastMetal. Both are served from the same OpenAI-compatible endpoint and API key; switching is a change to the model string.

Specs and pricing

anthropic logoClaude Opus 4.8openai logoGPT-5.6 Terra
ProviderAnthropicOpenAI
Input (per 1M tokens)¥893.5¥357.4
Output (per 1M tokens)¥4,467.5¥2,144.4
Typical cost (1,000 in + 500 out tokens × 1,000 calls)¥3,127¥1,430
Context window1,000,000 tokens1,050,000 tokens
Release date5/27/20267/9/2026
Input modalitiestext, image, filefile, image, text
Arena · overall#22 · ELO 1,474#34 · ELO 1,468
Arena · Japanese#26 · ELO 1,448Unranked
Arena · coding#12 · ELO 1,528#22 · ELO 1,521

Prices are FastMetal's yen rates before tax. Arena ranks are as of the latest leaderboard scrape.

Which should you pick?

  • On price, GPT-5.6 Terra: ¥2,144.4 per 1M output tokens, 52% less than Claude Opus 4.8.
  • On the Overall arena board, Claude Opus 4.8 ranks higher (#22; GPT-5.6 Terra is #34).
  • On the Coding arena board, Claude Opus 4.8 ranks higher (#12; GPT-5.6 Terra is #22).
  • For long documents, GPT-5.6 Terra: a 1,050,000-token context window against 1,000,000 for Claude Opus 4.8.
  • If in doubt, try both on the same key. Switching is a change to the model string, and each is billed at its own rate.

Real answers to the same prompts

Exactly what the FastMetal gateway returned, side by side. Not benchmark scores: actual output.

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'. Explain your reasoning step by step.

Claude Opus 4.8

# Counting 'r's in "strawberry" ## Step-by-step process: Let me go through each letter one at a time: | Position | Letter | Is it 'r'? | |----------|--------|-----------| | 1 | s | No | | 2 | t | No | | 3 | r | ✓ Yes (1) | | 4 | a | No | | 5 | w | No | | 6 | b | No | | 7 | e | No | | 8 | r | ✓ Yes (2) | | 9 | r | ✓ Yes (3) | | 10 | y | No | ## Answer: There are **3** 'r's in "strawberry". The three 'r's appear at positions 3, 8, and 9 — one after the "st" and two together in the "rry" ending.
4.5s262 output tokens

GPT-5.6 Terra

“strawberry” is spelled: s t **r** a w b e **r** **r** y There are **3** occurrences of the letter **r**.
3.6s71 output tokens

Debug This Error

I'm getting the following error in my Node.js application: TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map') at UserList (/app/components/UserList.js:12:25) at renderWithHooks (/app/node_modules/rea…

Claude Opus 4.8

# What's Causing the Error The error tells you exactly what's happening: ``` TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map') at UserList (/app/components/UserList.js:12:25) ``` At the moment `UserList` renders, the `users` prop is `undefined`, and you can't call `.map()` on `undefined`. This is extremely common when data is fetched asynchronously—the component renders **before** the data arrives. Common reasons `users` is undefined: - The parent hasn't passed the `users` prop at all - Data is still loading from an API (initial state is `undefined`) - The API response shape differs from what you expect (e.g. `data.users` vs `data`) --- # How to Fix It ## Option 1: De…
11.3s761 output tokens

GPT-5.6 Terra

The error means `users` is `undefined` when `UserList` renders, so React tries to evaluate: ```js users.map(...) ``` But `.map()` only exists on arrays. Common causes: - The parent component does not pass a `users` prop. - The user data is loaded asynchronously and has not arrived on the first render. - The API response shape differs from what you expect, e.g. data is in `response.data.users` rather than `response.data`. - The parent initializes its user state as `undefined` or `null`. ## Fix options ### 1. Initialize users as an empty array In the parent component: ```jsx const [users, setUsers] = useState([]); ``` Then pass it normally: ```jsx <UserList users={users} /> ``` An e…
5.8s559 output tokens

Code Review

Please review the following Python function and suggest improvements for readability, performance, and best practices: def get_data(url, retries=3): import requests import time for i in range(retries):…

Claude Opus 4.8

# Code Review Here's a breakdown of issues and suggested improvements for your function. ## Key Issues 1. **Imports inside the function** — should be at module level (runs on every call, harder to see dependencies). 2. **Bare `except:`** — catches everything, including `KeyboardInterrupt` and `SystemExit`. Silently swallowing errors makes debugging hard. 3. **Magic numbers** — `10`, `2`, `200` scattered around; extract as parameters/constants. 4. **`== True` comparison** — non-Pythonic; use the value directly (or `is True` if strict). 5. **Blocking `time.sleep(2)`** — fixed delay; exponential backoff is a better practice. 6. **`r.status_code == 200`** — misses other success codes; use `ra…
16.9s1403 output tokens

GPT-5.6 Terra

Here are the main areas to improve: ### Issues in the original code - **Imports inside the function**: Move `requests` and `time` imports to module scope. - **Bare `except:`**: This catches everything, including `KeyboardInterrupt` and programming errors. Catch `requests.RequestException` (and possibly JSON decoding errors) instead. - **Status code check**: Prefer `response.raise_for_status()` or `response.ok` over manually checking only for `200`. Successful responses can include other 2xx status codes. - **`== True`**: Use `if item.get("active"):` instead. - **Potential `KeyError`**: `item["name"]`, `item["id"]`, and `item["active"]` can fail if the API response is incomplete. Use `.get(…
10.6s939 output tokens

Compare on more prompts →

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.8 or GPT-5.6 Terra?
Per 1M output tokens, Claude Opus 4.8 is ¥4,467.5 and GPT-5.6 Terra is ¥2,144.4 on FastMetal (yen, before tax), so GPT-5.6 Terra is cheaper.
How do the context windows of Claude Opus 4.8 and GPT-5.6 Terra compare?
Claude Opus 4.8 takes 1,000,000 tokens; GPT-5.6 Terra takes 1,050,000.
Which ranks higher, Claude Opus 4.8 or GPT-5.6 Terra?
Claude Opus 4.8 ranks higher on the public arena (Claude Opus 4.8 #26, GPT-5.6 Terra #34). Ranks move as the leaderboard updates.
Can I use Claude Opus 4.8 and GPT-5.6 Terra with the same API key?
Yes. On FastMetal's OpenAI-compatible endpoint, switch by passing "anthropic-claude-opus-4-8" or "gpt-5.6-terra" as the model. Each is billed at its own rate from the same prepaid balance.

Try both on one API key

Create an account and add credit to call Claude Opus 4.8 and GPT-5.6 Terra from the browser chat and the API. No monthly fee.

More comparisons with Claude Opus 4.8

More comparisons with GPT-5.6 Terra