Model comparison

Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Qwen3.8 27B

Pricing, context window and real answers (September 2026)

Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Anthropic) and Qwen3.8 27B (Qwen), compared as you can actually call them on FastMetal. Both are served from the same OpenAI-compatible endpoint and API key; switching is a change to the model string.

Specs and pricing

anthropic logoClaude Sonnet 5.5qwen logoQwen3.8 27B
ProviderAnthropicQwen
Input (per 1M tokens)¥357.4¥33.6
Output (per 1M tokens)¥1,787¥420
Typical cost (1,000 in + 500 out tokens × 1,000 calls)¥1,251¥244
Context window1,000,000 tokens1,000,000 tokens
Release date9/28/20268/14/2026
Input modalitiestext, image, filetext, image, video
Throughput (p50)—92 tokens/s (n=17)
Arena · overallUnranked#95 · ELO 1,438
Arena · JapaneseUnranked#79 · ELO 1,402
Arena · codingUnranked#65 · ELO 1,504

Prices are FastMetal's yen rates before tax.

Rankings: LMArena leaderboard dataset (lmarena-ai/leaderboard-dataset), CC BY 4.0, snapshot 2026-09-25; category names mapped and ratings rounded by FastMetal.

Which should you pick?

  • On price, Qwen3.8 27B: ¥420 per 1M output tokens, 76% less than Claude Sonnet 5.5.
  • If in doubt, try both on the same key. Switching is a change to the model string, and each is billed at its own rate.

Real answers to the same prompts

Exactly what the FastMetal gateway returned, side by side. Not benchmark scores: actual output.

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'. Explain your reasoning step by step.

Claude Sonnet 5.5

Let me go through the word letter by letter. **strawberry** | Position | Letter | |---|---| | 1 | s | | 2 | t | | 3 | **r** ← 1st | | 4 | a | | 5 | w | | 6 | b | | 7 | e | | 8 | **r** ← 2nd | | 9 | **r** ← 3rd | | 10 | y | **Step-by-step reasoning:** 1. I split the word into individual letters: s-t-r-a-w-b-e-r-r-y (10 letters total). 2. I checked each letter for 'r'. 3. The first 'r' is in position 3, in "str…". 4. The second and third 'r's are in positions 8 and 9, in the "…rry" ending. **Answer: There are 3 r's in "strawberry".** A common mistake is to see "berry" as having only one 'r' (or to treat the double-r as a single letter), which leads to the incorrect answer of 2.
3.1s332 output tokens

Qwen3.8 27B

The word is: **strawberry** Break it into letters: 1. s 2. t 3. r 4. a 5. w 6. b 7. e 8. r 9. r 10. y Now count the **r**’s: - 3rd letter: **r** - 8th letter: **r** - 9th letter: **r** So, there are **3** r’s in **strawberry**.
3.6s239 output tokens

Debug This Error

I'm getting the following error in my Node.js application: TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map') at UserList (/app/components/UserList.js:12:25) at renderWithHooks (/app/node_modules/rea…

Claude Sonnet 5.5

## Cause `users` is `undefined` when the component renders, so `users.map(...)` throws. This happens when: 1. **The parent doesn't pass the prop**, or passes it under a different name (e.g. `<UserList data={x} />` or a typo like `user=`). 2. **The data loads asynchronously.** On the first render, the state or fetch result hasn't arrived yet. 3. **The value is wrong.** For example, the API returns `{ users: [...] }` and you passed the whole object, or you're reading a property that doesn't exist (`response.data.users` vs `response.users`). ## Fixes ### 1. Default value (simplest) ```jsx function UserList({ users = [] }) { return ( <ul> {users.map(user => <li key={user.id}>{use…
6.7s824 output tokens

Qwen3.8 27B

The error means that `users` is `undefined` when `UserList` renders: ```jsx {users.map(...)} ``` JavaScript cannot call `.map()` on `undefined`. For example, this would cause the error: ```jsx <UserList /> ``` because `users` is not being passed in. ## Simple fix: give `users` a default value ```jsx function UserList({ users = [] }) { return ( <ul> {users.map(user => <li key={user.id}>{user.name}</li>)} </ul> ); } ``` Now if `users` is not passed in, it defaults to an empty array. ## Better fix: make sure the parent passes an array Wherever you use `UserList`, pass `users`: ```jsx <UserList users={users} /> ``` If `users` comes from an API or state, make sure it…
9.5s601 output tokens

Code Review

Please review the following Python function and suggest improvements for readability, performance, and best practices: def get_data(url, retries=3): import requests import time for i in range(retries):…

Claude Sonnet 5.5

# Code Review ## Main Issues ### 1. Bare `except:` hides bugs (most important) It catches everything, including `KeyboardInterrupt` and `SystemExit`. It also wraps your parsing logic, so a missing `"active"` key (`KeyError`) or bad JSON is treated as a network failure, retried 3 times with sleeps, and then silently becomes `[]`. Catch only `requests.RequestException`, and keep parsing outside the `try`. ### 2. Silent failure Returning `[]` after all retries fails is indistinguishable from "the server returned no active items." Callers can't tell whether something went wrong. Raise an exception (or at least log) once retries are exhausted. ### 3. Retry logic - It sleeps after the final at…
20.9s3003 output tokens

Qwen3.8 27B

The function works at a basic level, but it has several readability, reliability, and best-practice issues. ## Main issues 1. **Imports inside the function** ```python import requests import time ``` Imports should normally be at the top of the module unless there is a specific reason to lazy-load them. 2. **Bare `except` is too broad** ```python except: time.sleep(2) ``` This catches almost everything, including `KeyboardInterrupt`, `SystemExit`, `KeyError`, `TypeError`, and other programming errors. It makes debugging harder and can retry failures that should not be retried. 3. **It retries on every non-`200` status** Retrying `401 Unauthorized`, `4…
205.9s13103 output tokens

Compare on more prompts →

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 5.5 or Qwen3.8 27B?
Per 1M output tokens, Claude Sonnet 5.5 is ¥1,787 and Qwen3.8 27B is ¥420 on FastMetal (yen, before tax), so Qwen3.8 27B is cheaper.
How do the context windows of Claude Sonnet 5.5 and Qwen3.8 27B compare?
Claude Sonnet 5.5 takes 1,000,000 tokens; Qwen3.8 27B takes 1,000,000.
Can I use Claude Sonnet 5.5 and Qwen3.8 27B with the same API key?
Yes. On FastMetal's OpenAI-compatible endpoint, switch by passing "anthropic-claude-sonnet-5-5" or "qwen3.8-27b" as the model. Each is billed at its own rate from the same prepaid balance.

Try both on one API key

Create an account and add credit to call Claude Sonnet 5.5 and Qwen3.8 27B from the browser chat and the API. No monthly fee.

More comparisons with Claude Sonnet 5.5

More comparisons with Qwen3.8 27B