GPT-5.6 Luna vs Pareto
Pricing, context window and real answers (November 2026)
GPT-5.6 Luna (OpenAI) and Pareto (Unbiased), compared as you can actually call them on FastMetal. Both are served from the same OpenAI-compatible endpoint and API key; switching is a change to the model string.
Specs and pricing
| Pareto | ||
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Unbiased |
| Input (per 1M tokens) | $0.211 | $0.88 |
| Output (per 1M tokens) | $1.27 | $3.52 |
| Typical cost (1,000 in + 500 out tokens × 1,000 calls) | $0.844 | $2.64 |
| Context window | 1,050,000 tokens | 1,048,576 tokens |
| Release date | 7/9/2026 | 10/15/2026 |
| Input modalities | file, image, text | text, image |
| Throughput (p50) | 166 tokens/s (n=28) | 25000 tokens/s (n=18) |
| Arena · overall | #76 · ELO 1,453 | Unranked |
| Arena · Japanese | #58 · ELO 1,433 | Unranked |
| Arena · coding | #78 · ELO 1,502 | Unranked |
Prices are FastMetal's rates, before tax.
Rankings: LMArena leaderboard dataset (lmarena-ai/leaderboard-dataset), CC BY 4.0, snapshot 2026-10-28; category names mapped and ratings rounded by FastMetal.
Which should you pick?
- On price, GPT-5.6 Luna: $1.27 per 1M output tokens, 64% less than Pareto.
- For long documents, GPT-5.6 Luna: a 1,050,000-token context window against 1,048,576 for Pareto.
- If in doubt, try both on the same key. Switching is a change to the model string, and each is billed at its own rate.
Real answers to the same prompts
Exactly what the FastMetal gateway returned, side by side. Not benchmark scores: actual output.
Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'
Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'. Explain your reasoning step by step.
GPT-5.6 Luna
Pareto
Debug This Error
I'm getting the following error in my Node.js application: TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map') at UserList (/app/components/UserList.js:12:25) at renderWithHooks (/app/node_modules/rea…
GPT-5.6 Luna
Pareto
Code Review
Please review the following Python function and suggest improvements for readability, performance, and best practices: def get_data(url, retries=3): import requests import time for i in range(retries):…
GPT-5.6 Luna
Pareto
Frequently asked questions
- Which is cheaper, GPT-5.6 Luna or Pareto?
- Per 1M output tokens, GPT-5.6 Luna is $1.27 and Pareto is $3.52 on FastMetal (US dollars, before tax), so GPT-5.6 Luna is cheaper.
- How do the context windows of GPT-5.6 Luna and Pareto compare?
- GPT-5.6 Luna takes 1,050,000 tokens; Pareto takes 1,048,576.
- Can I use GPT-5.6 Luna and Pareto with the same API key?
- Yes. On FastMetal's OpenAI-compatible endpoint, switch by passing "gpt-5.6-luna" or "pareto" as the model. Each is billed at its own rate from the same prepaid balance.
Try both on one API key
Create an account and add credit to call GPT-5.6 Luna and Pareto from the browser chat and the API. No monthly fee.