GLM 5.3 vs Mercury 2.5
Pricing, context window and real answers (September 2026)
GLM 5.3 (Z.ai) and Mercury 2.5 (Inception), compared as you can actually call them on FastMetal. Both are served from the same OpenAI-compatible endpoint and API key; switching is a change to the model string.
Specs and pricing
 GLM 5.3 | Mercury 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai | Inception |
| Input (per 1M tokens) | ¥250.18 | ¥6.77 |
| Output (per 1M tokens) | ¥786.28 | ¥25.38 |
| Typical cost (1,000 in + 500 out tokens × 1,000 calls) | ¥643 | ¥19 |
| Context window | 1,048,576 tokens | 260,000 tokens |
| Release date | 8/18/2026 | 9/8/2026 |
| Input modalities | text | text |
| Arena · overall | #20 · ELO 1,482 | Unranked |
| Arena · Japanese | Unranked | Unranked |
| Arena · coding | #9 · ELO 1,534 | Unranked |
Prices are FastMetal's yen rates before tax. Arena ranks are as of the latest leaderboard scrape.
Which should you pick?
- On price, Mercury 2.5: ¥25.38 per 1M output tokens, 97% less than GLM 5.3.
- For long documents, GLM 5.3: a 1,048,576-token context window against 260,000 for Mercury 2.5.
- If in doubt, try both on the same key. Switching is a change to the model string, and each is billed at its own rate.
Real answers to the same prompts
Exactly what the FastMetal gateway returned, side by side. Not benchmark scores: actual output.
Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'
Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'. Explain your reasoning step by step.
GLM 5.3
# Counting 'r's in "strawberry"
**Step 1: Spell out the word letter by letter.**
s - t - r - a - w - b - e - r - r - y
**Step 2: Go through each letter and mark the 'r's.**
| Position | Letter | Is it 'r'? |
|----------|--------|------------|
| 1 | s | No |
| 2 | t | No |
| 3 | **r** | ✅ Yes (1st) |
| 4 | a | No |
| 5 | w | No |
| 6 | b | No |
| 7 | e | No |
| 8 | **r** | ✅ Yes (2nd) |
| 9 | **r** | ✅ Yes (3rd) |
| 10 | y | No |
**Step 3: Tally the results.**
- 1st 'r' in "st**r**awberry"
- 2nd 'r' in "strawbe**r**ry"
- 3rd 'r' in "strawber**r**y"
## Answer: There are **3** 'r's in "strawberry."
(Note: two of them appear together in the "rr" near the end, which is easy to miss when c…
5.8s493 output tokens
Mercury 2.5
To determine the number of 'r's in the word "strawberry", we can examine each letter in sequence:
1. **s** - Not 'r'
2. **t** - Not 'r'
3. **r** - First 'r' found
4. **a** - Not 'r'
5. **w** - Not 'r'
6. **b** - Not 'r'
7. **e** - Not 'r'
8. **r** - Second 'r' found
9. **r** - Third 'r' found
10. **y** - Not 'r'
Counting these occurrences, there are **3** 'r's in "strawberry".
1.8s968 output tokens
Debug This Error
I'm getting the following error in my Node.js application: TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map') at UserList (/app/components/UserList.js:12:25) at renderWithHooks (/app/node_modules/rea…
GLM 5.3
## What's happening
The error means `users` is `undefined` when the component renders. `undefined` doesn't have a `.map()` method, so JavaScript throws a `TypeError`. Since destructured props that aren't passed default to `undefined`, something upstream isn't providing the value you expect.
## Common causes
1. **The parent doesn't pass the prop, or uses a different name:**
```jsx
<UserList /> {/* missing users */}
<UserList userList={users} /> {/* prop name mismatch */}
```
2. **Async data hasn't loaded yet** — the component renders before an API call completes, and the initial value is `undefined`:
```jsx
const [users, setUsers] = useState(); // undefin…
17.1s1345 output tokens
Mercury 2.5
This error occurs because the `users` prop is `undefined` when the component renders. Since the code calls `.map()` on `users`, JavaScript throws a TypeError when `users` is not an array.
Here is how to fix it:
1. **Set a Default Value**
Update the function signature to default `users` to an empty array if it is not provided:
```javascript
function UserList({ users = [] }) {
// ...
}
```
2. **Add a Conditional Check**
If `users` might be null or undefined during data loading, guard the map operation:
```javascript
{users && users.map(user => <li key={user.id}>{user.name}</li>)}
```
3. **Verify Parent Props**
Ensure the parent component pas…
2.4s1028 output tokens
Code Review
Please review the following Python function and suggest improvements for readability, performance, and best practices: def get_data(url, retries=3): import requests import time for i in range(retries):…
GLM 5.3
Here's a breakdown of the issues, followed by a refactored version.
## Readability
- **Move imports to module level.** PEP 8 requires top-level imports; importing inside a function hides dependencies and adds overhead on every call (small, but pointless).
- **`item["active"] == True`** → just `item.get("active")`. Comparing to `True` with `==` is flagged by PEP 8, and `.get()` avoids a `KeyError` if the key is missing.
- **Use a list comprehension** instead of initializing a list and appending in a loop.
- **Rename things.** `get_data` doesn't say what it does (`fetch_active_items`?), and `response` beats `r`. Use `_` for the unused loop counter.
- **Magic numbers** (`2`, `10`) should be n…
75.0s6434 output tokens
Mercury 2.5
Here is a review of the function with suggestions for improvement.
### Key Observations
1. **Imports:** Libraries should be imported at the module level, not inside functions.
2. **Exception Handling:** Bare `except:` clauses catch system exits and interrupts. Use specific exceptions like `requests.exceptions.RequestException`.
3. **Logic & Pythonicity:**
* Avoid `== True`; rely on truthiness or `item.get("active")`.
* List comprehensions are more concise and efficient than manual appending.
4. **Retry Strategy:** Implement exponential backoff instead of fixed sleeps, and avoid sleeping after the final failed attempt.
5. **Documentation:** Add type hints and a docstring fo…
4.6s1999 output tokens
Frequently asked questions
- Which is cheaper, GLM 5.3 or Mercury 2.5?
- Per 1M output tokens, GLM 5.3 is ¥786.28 and Mercury 2.5 is ¥25.38 on FastMetal (yen, before tax), so Mercury 2.5 is cheaper.
- How do the context windows of GLM 5.3 and Mercury 2.5 compare?
- GLM 5.3 takes 1,048,576 tokens; Mercury 2.5 takes 260,000.
- Can I use GLM 5.3 and Mercury 2.5 with the same API key?
- Yes. On FastMetal's OpenAI-compatible endpoint, switch by passing "glm-5.3" or "mercury-2.5" as the model. Each is billed at its own rate from the same prepaid balance.
Try both on one API key
Create an account and add credit to call GLM 5.3 and Mercury 2.5 from the browser chat and the API. No monthly fee.