Model comparison

GLM 5.3 FlashX vs GPT-5.6 Luna

Pricing, context window and real answers (September 2026)

GLM 5.3 FlashX (Z.ai) and GPT-5.6 Luna (OpenAI), compared as you can actually call them on FastMetal. Both are served from the same OpenAI-compatible endpoint and API key; switching is a change to the model string.

Specs and pricing

z-ai logoGLM 5.3 FlashXopenai logoGPT-5.6 Luna
ProviderZ.aiOpenAI
Input (per 1M tokens)¥66.12¥35.74
Output (per 1M tokens)¥223.38¥214.44
Typical cost (1,000 in + 500 out tokens × 1,000 calls)¥178¥143
Context window1,048,576 tokens1,050,000 tokens
Release date9/18/20267/9/2026
Input modalitiestext, image, videofile, image, text
Throughput (p50)
Arena · overallUnranked#67 · ELO 1,452
Arena · JapaneseUnranked#42 · ELO 1,439
Arena · codingUnranked#71 · ELO 1,498

Prices are FastMetal's yen rates before tax. Arena ranks are as of the latest leaderboard scrape.

Which should you pick?

  • On price, GPT-5.6 Luna: ¥214.44 per 1M output tokens, 4% less than GLM 5.3 FlashX.
  • For long documents, GPT-5.6 Luna: a 1,050,000-token context window against 1,048,576 for GLM 5.3 FlashX.
  • If in doubt, try both on the same key. Switching is a change to the model string, and each is billed at its own rate.

Real answers to the same prompts

Exactly what the FastMetal gateway returned, side by side. Not benchmark scores: actual output.

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'. Explain your reasoning step by step.

GLM 5.3 FlashX

# Counting 'r's in "strawberry" **Step 1: Write out each letter with its position** | Position | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | |----------|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|----| | Letter | s | t | r | a | w | b | e | r | r | y | **Step 2: Check each letter one by one** - Position 1: **s** → not an 'r' - Position 2: **t** → not an 'r' - Position 3: **r** → ✅ 'r' found (count: 1) - Position 4: **a** → not an 'r' - Position 5: **w** → not an 'r' - Position 6: **b** → not an 'r' - Position 7: **e** → not an 'r' - Position 8: **r** → ✅ 'r' found (count: 2) - Position 9: **r** → ✅ 'r' found (count: 3) - Position 10: **y** → not an 'r' **Step 3: Tally the results** The 'r's a…
4.1s549 output tokens

GPT-5.6 Luna

The word **“strawberry”** is spelled: **s – t – r – a – w – b – e – r – r – y** The letter **“r”** appears at positions **3, 8, and 9**. **Answer: 3**
3.0s120 output tokens

Debug This Error

I'm getting the following error in my Node.js application: TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map') at UserList (/app/components/UserList.js:12:25) at renderWithHooks (/app/node_modules/rea…

GLM 5.3 FlashX

## What's Happening The error means `users` is `undefined` at the time `UserList` renders. You're calling `.map()` on `undefined`, which JavaScript doesn't allow. This almost always happens for one of these reasons: 1. **The parent isn't passing the prop** — `<UserList />` with no `users` prop 2. **Data hasn't loaded yet** — you're fetching asynchronously, so the first render happens before the data arrives 3. **Prop name mismatch** — e.g., passing `user` but reading `users` 4. **Parent state initialized to `undefined`** — e.g., `useState()` instead of `useState([])` ## Fixes ### Option 1: Default parameter (simplest) ```jsx function UserList({ users = [] }) { return ( <ul>…
6.8s934 output tokens

GPT-5.6 Luna

`users` is `undefined` when `UserList` renders, so calling `.map()` on it fails. `.map()` only exists on arrays. Common causes include: - The parent does not pass a `users` prop. - The prop name differs, such as `userList` instead of `users`. - Users are loaded asynchronously and are initially undefined. - The API response has a different shape, such as `{ data: [...] }`. ### Provide a default value ```jsx function UserList({ users = [] }) { return ( <ul> {users.map(user => ( <li key={user.id}>{user.name}</li> ))} </ul> ); } ``` The parent should pass an array: ```jsx <UserList users={users} /> ``` If the list comes from state, initialize it as an empty…
4.8s507 output tokens

Code Review

Please review the following Python function and suggest improvements for readability, performance, and best practices: def get_data(url, retries=3): import requests import time for i in range(retries):…

GLM 5.3 FlashX

# Code Review The function works, but there are several issues worth addressing — including one subtle bug caused by the bare `except`. ## Correctness issues (most important) 1. **Bare `except:` is dangerous and masks a bug.** It catches *everything*, including `KeyboardInterrupt` and `SystemExit` (so Ctrl+C during a retry sleep is swallowed). Worse: because your data-processing loop sits inside the `try`, a `KeyError` from a malformed item is treated as a network failure — triggering a pointless re-download of the URL and silently discarding the real error. Catch only `requests.RequestException` (and `ValueError` for JSON decode failures). 2. **Silent failure.** Returning `[]` on error…
36.9s5836 output tokens

GPT-5.6 Luna

### Main issues - Imports should be at module level, not inside the function. - A bare `except:` catches everything, including programming errors and `KeyboardInterrupt`. - The function sleeps even after the final failed attempt. - It retries all HTTP statuses, including permanent errors such as `404`. - `status_code == 200` excludes other successful `2xx` responses. - `if item["active"] == True` should generally be `if item.get("active") is True`. - A `requests.Session` can reuse connections and improve performance. - Returning `[]` for every failure makes it impossible to distinguish “no active items” from “request failed.” - Retries should generally use backoff rather than a fixed delay.…
23.3s1978 output tokens

Compare on more prompts →

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, GLM 5.3 FlashX or GPT-5.6 Luna?
Per 1M output tokens, GLM 5.3 FlashX is ¥223.38 and GPT-5.6 Luna is ¥214.44 on FastMetal (yen, before tax), so GPT-5.6 Luna is cheaper.
How do the context windows of GLM 5.3 FlashX and GPT-5.6 Luna compare?
GLM 5.3 FlashX takes 1,048,576 tokens; GPT-5.6 Luna takes 1,050,000.
Can I use GLM 5.3 FlashX and GPT-5.6 Luna with the same API key?
Yes. On FastMetal's OpenAI-compatible endpoint, switch by passing "glm-5.3-flashx" or "gpt-5.6-luna" as the model. Each is billed at its own rate from the same prepaid balance.

Try both on one API key

Create an account and add credit to call GLM 5.3 FlashX and GPT-5.6 Luna from the browser chat and the API. No monthly fee.

More comparisons with GLM 5.3 FlashX

More comparisons with GPT-5.6 Luna