Model comparison

Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs GLM 4.7

Pricing, context window and real answers (August 2026)

Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Anthropic) and GLM 4.7 (Z.ai), compared as you can actually call them on FastMetal. Both are served from the same OpenAI-compatible endpoint and API key; switching is a change to the model string.

Specs and pricing

anthropic logoClaude Sonnet 4.6z-ai logoGLM 4.7
ProviderAnthropicZ.ai
Input (per 1M tokens)¥554.4¥107.22
Output (per 1M tokens)¥2,772¥393.14
Typical cost (1,000 in + 500 out tokens × 1,000 calls)¥1,940¥304
Context window1,000,000 tokens202,752 tokens
Release date2/17/202612/22/2025
Input modalitiestext, imagetext
Arena · overall#32 · ELO 1,472#79 · ELO 1,442
Arena · Japanese#41 · ELO 1,438Unranked
Arena · coding#14 · ELO 1,528#87 · ELO 1,485

Prices are FastMetal's yen rates before tax. Arena ranks are as of the latest leaderboard scrape.

Which should you pick?

  • On price, GLM 4.7: ¥393.14 per 1M output tokens, 86% less than Claude Sonnet 4.6.
  • On the Overall arena board, Claude Sonnet 4.6 ranks higher (#32; GLM 4.7 is #79).
  • On the Coding arena board, Claude Sonnet 4.6 ranks higher (#14; GLM 4.7 is #87).
  • For long documents, Claude Sonnet 4.6: a 1,000,000-token context window against 202,752 for GLM 4.7.
  • If in doubt, try both on the same key. Switching is a change to the model string, and each is billed at its own rate.

Real answers to the same prompts

Exactly what the FastMetal gateway returned, side by side. Not benchmark scores: actual output.

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'. Explain your reasoning step by step.

Claude Sonnet 4.6

## Counting the letter 'r' in 'strawberry' Let me go through the word letter by letter: | Position | Letter | Is it 'r'? | |----------|--------|------------| | 1 | s | No | | 2 | t | No | | 3 | r | ✅ Yes | | 4 | a | No | | 5 | w | No | | 6 | b | No | | 7 | e | No | | 8 | r | ✅ Yes | | 9 | r | ✅ Yes | | 10 | y | No | ## Result There are **3 r's** in 'strawberry'.
2.2s181 output tokens

GLM 4.7

There are **3** "r"s in "strawberry". Here is the step-by-step reasoning: 1. **Break down the word into individual letters:** s - t - r - a - w - b - e - r - r - y 2. **Identify the position of each 'r':** * The 3rd letter is **r**. * The 8th letter is **r**. * The 9th letter is **r**. 3. **Count the total occurrences:** 1 + 1 + 1 = 3.
23.3s685 output tokens

Debug This Error

I'm getting the following error in my Node.js application: TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map') at UserList (/app/components/UserList.js:12:25) at renderWithHooks (/app/node_modules/rea…

Claude Sonnet 4.6

## Problem Analysis The error occurs because `users` is `undefined` when the component renders. You're calling `.map()` on `undefined`, which throws a `TypeError`. **Common causes:** - The prop isn't passed by the parent component - Data is still loading asynchronously when the component first renders - The parent passes `undefined` or a misspelled prop name --- ## Solutions ### Option 1: Default Parameter Value (Simplest Fix) ```javascript function UserList({ users = [] }) { return ( <ul> {users.map(user => <li key={user.id}>{user.name}</li>)} </ul> ); } ``` This assigns an empty array if `users` is `undefined`, so `.map()` always has an array to work with. --- ###…
9.4s798 output tokens

GLM 4.7

### The Cause The error `TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map')` means that the variable `users` is `undefined` when the component tries to render. In React, this typically happens for one of two reasons: 1. The **Parent Component** is not passing the `users` prop to `UserList`. 2. The **Parent Component** passed the prop, but the data hasn't loaded yet (e.g., an API call is still pending), so the value is initially `undefined`. Since `undefined` does not have a `.map()` method, the application crashes. --- ### How to Fix It There are two main ways to fix this: handling it inside the `UserList` component (defensive coding) or fixing the parent component passing…
42.0s1384 output tokens

Code Review

Please review the following Python function and suggest improvements for readability, performance, and best practices: def get_data(url, retries=3): import requests import time for i in range(retries):…

Claude Sonnet 4.6

## Code Review and Improvements ### Issues Identified 1. **Imports inside function** – should be at module level 2. **Bare `except`** – catches everything including `KeyboardInterrupt`, `SystemExit` 3. **`== True` comparison** – not Pythonic 4. **No logging/error visibility** – silent failures make debugging hard 5. **Magic numbers** – hardcoded `2`, `10` with no explanation 6. **No distinction between retriable/non-retriable errors** – e.g., 404 should not be retried 7. **Inefficient list building** – list comprehension is cleaner 8. **No exponential backoff** – fixed sleep is naive for real-world retry logic 9. **Missing type hints and docstring** --- ### Improved Version ```python im…
14.4s1099 output tokens

GLM 4.7

Here is a review of your function with suggestions for improving readability, performance, and best practices, followed by a refactored version of the code. ### Code Review 1. **Import Placement:** You import `requests` and `time` inside the function. Imports should generally be placed at the top of the file so they are loaded once when the module starts, rather than every time the function is called. 2. **Bare `except:`:** You used `except:` without specifying an exception type. This is dangerous because it catches *everything*, including `KeyboardInterrupt` (Ctrl+C) and `SystemExit`, preventing your program from terminating when needed. You should specifically catch `requests.exception…
24.5s2951 output tokens

Compare on more prompts →

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 4.6 or GLM 4.7?
Per 1M output tokens, Claude Sonnet 4.6 is ¥2,772 and GLM 4.7 is ¥393.14 on FastMetal (yen, before tax), so GLM 4.7 is cheaper.
How do the context windows of Claude Sonnet 4.6 and GLM 4.7 compare?
Claude Sonnet 4.6 takes 1,000,000 tokens; GLM 4.7 takes 202,752.
Which ranks higher, Claude Sonnet 4.6 or GLM 4.7?
Claude Sonnet 4.6 ranks higher on the public arena (Claude Sonnet 4.6 #41, GLM 4.7 #79). Ranks move as the leaderboard updates.
Can I use Claude Sonnet 4.6 and GLM 4.7 with the same API key?
Yes. On FastMetal's OpenAI-compatible endpoint, switch by passing "anthropic-claude-sonnet-4-6" or "glm-4.7" as the model. Each is billed at its own rate from the same prepaid balance.

Try both on one API key

Create an account and add credit to call Claude Sonnet 4.6 and GLM 4.7 from the browser chat and the API. No monthly fee.

More comparisons with Claude Sonnet 4.6

More comparisons with GLM 4.7