Claude Opus 5.5 vs LLM-jp-3.1 8x13B instruct4
Pricing, context window and real answers (September 2026)
Claude Opus 5.5 (Anthropic) and LLM-jp-3.1 8x13B instruct4 (LLM-jp), compared as you can actually call them on FastMetal. Both are served from the same OpenAI-compatible endpoint and API key; switching is a change to the model string.
Specs and pricing
 Claude Opus 5.5 | LLM-jp-3.1 8x13B instruct4 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | LLM-jp |
| Input (per 1M tokens) | ¥692.4 | ¥16 |
| Output (per 1M tokens) | ¥3,462 | ¥79 |
| Typical cost (1,000 in + 500 out tokens × 1,000 calls) | ¥2,423 | ¥56 |
| Context window | 1,000,000 tokens | 4,096 tokens |
| Release date | 9/22/2026 | 3/21/2026 |
| Input modalities | text, image, file | text |
| Throughput (p50) | — | — |
| Arena · overall | Unranked | Unranked |
| Arena · Japanese | Unranked | Unranked |
| Arena · coding | Unranked | Unranked |
Prices are FastMetal's yen rates before tax. Arena ranks are as of the latest leaderboard scrape.
Which should you pick?
- On price, LLM-jp-3.1 8x13B instruct4: ¥79 per 1M output tokens, 98% less than Claude Opus 5.5.
- For long documents, Claude Opus 5.5: a 1,000,000-token context window against 4,096 for LLM-jp-3.1 8x13B instruct4.
- If in doubt, try both on the same key. Switching is a change to the model string, and each is billed at its own rate.
Real answers to the same prompts
Exactly what the FastMetal gateway returned, side by side. Not benchmark scores: actual output.
Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'
Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'. Explain your reasoning step by step.
Claude Opus 5.5
# Counting 'r's in "strawberry"
**Step 1: Spell out the word letter by letter.**
| Position | Letter |
|----------|--------|
| 1 | s |
| 2 | t |
| 3 | **r** ← |
| 4 | a |
| 5 | w |
| 6 | b |
| 7 | e |
| 8 | **r** ← |
| 9 | **r** ← |
| 10 | y |
**Step 2: Mark each 'r'.**
- Position 3: the "r" in "st**r**aw"
- Positions 8 and 9: the double "rr" in "be**rr**y"
**Step 3: Add them up.**
1 (in "straw") + 2 (in "berry") = **3**
**Answer: There are 3 'r's in "strawberry."**
A common mistake is to count only 2, because the double "rr" in "berry" can be read as a single sound. Breaking the word into its parts, "straw" + "berry," makes all three easy to see.
5.4s376 output tokens
LLM-jp-3.1 8x13B instruct4
To count the number of 'r's in the word 'strawberry', follow these steps:
1. Identify the word: The word we are examining is 'strawberry'.
2. Understand the task: We need to find and count all occurrences of the letter 'r' in this word.
3. Begin with the first letter: The first letter is 's', which is not 'r', so we move on to the next letter.
4. Proceed to the second letter: The second letter is 't', which is also not 'r', so we continue to the third letter.
5. Reach the third letter: The third letter is 'r'. We have found one 'r'.
6. Continue to the fourth letter: The fourth letter is 'a', which is not 'r', so we move on to the fifth letter.
7. Examine the fifth letter: The fifth letter i…
4.0s400 output tokens
Debug This Error
I'm getting the following error in my Node.js application: TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map') at UserList (/app/components/UserList.js:12:25) at renderWithHooks (/app/node_modules/rea…
Claude Opus 5.5
## What's causing it
The error means `users` is `undefined` when `UserList` renders, so `users.map(...)` fails. The component itself is fine. The problem is the value it receives from its parent. Common reasons:
1. **Async data hasn't loaded yet.** This is the most common cause. The parent fetches users from an API, and on the first render the state is still `undefined`:
```jsx
const [users, setUsers] = useState(); // undefined on first render
useEffect(() => {
fetch('/api/users').then(r => r.json()).then(setUsers);
}, []);
return <UserList users={users} />; // crashes before fetch completes
```
2. **The prop isn't being passed**, or has a different name:
```js…
10.9s1040 output tokens
LLM-jp-3.1 8x13B instruct4
The error TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map') suggests that the 'users' argument passed to the UserList component is undefined or does not have a 'map' method.
The cause of the problem may be that the users variable is not being passed correctly or is not defined in the parent component. Check the props being passed to the UserList component to ensure that they are defined and contain the expected data.
To fix the issue, you can add some error handling and debugging to your component. Try logging the users variable to the console to verify that it is not undefined:
```jsx
function UserList({ users }) {
console.log("Users:", users);
if (!users) {
return <…
3.0s279 output tokens
Code Review
Please review the following Python function and suggest improvements for readability, performance, and best practices: def get_data(url, retries=3): import requests import time for i in range(retries):…
Claude Opus 5.5
# Code Review: `get_data`
The function works in the happy path, but it has several issues that can hide bugs, waste time, and make failures hard to diagnose.
## Issues
### 🔴 Correctness and Reliability
**1. The bare `except:` is the most serious problem.**
It catches everything, including `KeyboardInterrupt`, `SystemExit`, and bugs in your own code. For example, if an item is missing the `"name"` key, the resulting `KeyError` gets swallowed and the request is retried as if it were a network error. The same happens with invalid JSON. Catch only the exceptions you expect, such as `requests.ConnectionError` and `requests.Timeout`.
**2. Failure is indistinguishable from "no results."**
Ret…
33.5s4023 output tokens
LLM-jp-3.1 8x13B instruct4
The provided Python function aims to get data from a URL using the requests library, filter out specific items based on their "active" field, and return the result. Here are some suggestions to improve readability, performance, and adherence to best practices:
1. Configure the linter (e.g., flake8 or pylint) to ensure code quality and enforce a consistent coding style.
2. Use type hints to improve readability and maintainability.
3. Use context managers (with statement) for handling requests:
4. Rewrite the function using a more functional programming style:
Here's the improved version of the function:
```python
import requests
import time
from typing import List, Dict, Any
def get_da…
3.9s406 output tokens
Frequently asked questions
- Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 5.5 or LLM-jp-3.1 8x13B instruct4?
- Per 1M output tokens, Claude Opus 5.5 is ¥3,462 and LLM-jp-3.1 8x13B instruct4 is ¥79 on FastMetal (yen, before tax), so LLM-jp-3.1 8x13B instruct4 is cheaper.
- How do the context windows of Claude Opus 5.5 and LLM-jp-3.1 8x13B instruct4 compare?
- Claude Opus 5.5 takes 1,000,000 tokens; LLM-jp-3.1 8x13B instruct4 takes 4,096.
- Can I use Claude Opus 5.5 and LLM-jp-3.1 8x13B instruct4 with the same API key?
- Yes. On FastMetal's OpenAI-compatible endpoint, switch by passing "anthropic-claude-opus-5-5" or "llm-jp-3.1-8x13b-instruct4" as the model. Each is billed at its own rate from the same prepaid balance.
Try both on one API key
Create an account and add credit to call Claude Opus 5.5 and LLM-jp-3.1 8x13B instruct4 from the browser chat and the API. No monthly fee.
More comparisons with Claude Opus 5.5
More comparisons with LLM-jp-3.1 8x13B instruct4
- LLM-jp-3.1 8x13B instruct4 vs Claude Opus 5
- LLM-jp-3.1 8x13B instruct4 vs Claude Sonnet 5
- LLM-jp-3.1 8x13B instruct4 vs Claude Fable 5.1
- LLM-jp-3.1 8x13B instruct4 vs Claude Fable 5
- LLM-jp-3.1 8x13B instruct4 vs Claude Opus 4.8
- LLM-jp-3.1 8x13B instruct4 vs Claude Haiku 4.5
- LLM-jp-3.1 8x13B instruct4 details