Model comparison

Claude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Opus 5.5

Pricing, context window and real answers (September 2026)

Claude Fable 5.1 (Anthropic) and Claude Opus 5.5 (Anthropic), compared as you can actually call them on FastMetal. Both are served from the same OpenAI-compatible endpoint and API key; switching is a change to the model string.

Specs and pricing

anthropic logoClaude Fable 5.1anthropic logoClaude Opus 5.5
ProviderAnthropicAnthropic
Input (per 1M tokens)¥1,787¥692.4
Output (per 1M tokens)¥8,935¥3,462
Typical cost (1,000 in + 500 out tokens × 1,000 calls)¥6,255¥2,423
Context window1,000,000 tokens1,000,000 tokens
Release date9/1/20269/22/2026
Input modalitiestext, image, filetext, image, file
Throughput (p50)
Arena · overall#5 · ELO 1,498Unranked
Arena · JapaneseUnrankedUnranked
Arena · coding#32 · ELO 1,519Unranked

Prices are FastMetal's yen rates before tax. Arena ranks are as of the latest leaderboard scrape.

Which should you pick?

  • On price, Claude Opus 5.5: ¥3,462 per 1M output tokens, 61% less than Claude Fable 5.1.
  • If in doubt, try both on the same key. Switching is a change to the model string, and each is billed at its own rate.

Real answers to the same prompts

Exactly what the FastMetal gateway returned, side by side. Not benchmark scores: actual output.

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'. Explain your reasoning step by step.

Claude Fable 5.1

**Step 1: Write out the word letter by letter.** s - t - r - a - w - b - e - r - r - y **Step 2: Number each position.** 1. s 2. t 3. **r** 4. a 5. w 6. b 7. e 8. **r** 9. **r** 10. y **Step 3: Identify which positions contain 'r'.** - Position 3: r (in "str-") - Position 8: r (in "-ber-") - Position 9: r (in "-rry") **Step 4: Count them.** 3 + 1 + 1 = **3** **Answer: There are 3 'r's in "strawberry."** A helpful way to check: split the word into its parts — "straw" (1 r) + "berry" (2 r's) = 3 r's total.
7.9s259 output tokens

Claude Opus 5.5

# Counting 'r's in "strawberry" **Step 1: Spell out the word letter by letter.** | Position | Letter | |----------|--------| | 1 | s | | 2 | t | | 3 | **r** ← | | 4 | a | | 5 | w | | 6 | b | | 7 | e | | 8 | **r** ← | | 9 | **r** ← | | 10 | y | **Step 2: Mark each 'r'.** - Position 3: the "r" in "st**r**aw" - Positions 8 and 9: the double "rr" in "be**rr**y" **Step 3: Add them up.** 1 (in "straw") + 2 (in "berry") = **3** **Answer: There are 3 'r's in "strawberry."** A common mistake is to count only 2, because the double "rr" in "berry" can be read as a single sound. Breaking the word into its parts, "straw" + "berry," makes all three easy to see.
5.4s376 output tokens

Debug This Error

I'm getting the following error in my Node.js application: TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map') at UserList (/app/components/UserList.js:12:25) at renderWithHooks (/app/node_modules/rea…

Claude Fable 5.1

The error means that when `UserList` rendered, the `users` prop was `undefined`, so calling `.map()` on it failed. This typically happens because: 1. **The parent isn't passing the prop** (or misspelled it, e.g. `<UserList user={...} />`), or 2. **The data hasn't loaded yet.** A common pattern is fetching users in a `useEffect` and storing them in state whose initial value is `undefined` (e.g. `useState()`), so the first render happens before the data arrives. **Fixes** Give the prop a default value so the component is safe to render with no data: ```jsx function UserList({ users = [] }) { return ( <ul> {users.map(user => <li key={user.id}>{user.name}</li>)} </ul> ); }…
10.8s564 output tokens

Claude Opus 5.5

## What's causing it The error means `users` is `undefined` when `UserList` renders, so `users.map(...)` fails. The component itself is fine. The problem is the value it receives from its parent. Common reasons: 1. **Async data hasn't loaded yet.** This is the most common cause. The parent fetches users from an API, and on the first render the state is still `undefined`: ```jsx const [users, setUsers] = useState(); // undefined on first render useEffect(() => { fetch('/api/users').then(r => r.json()).then(setUsers); }, []); return <UserList users={users} />; // crashes before fetch completes ``` 2. **The prop isn't being passed**, or has a different name: ```js…
10.9s1040 output tokens

Code Review

Please review the following Python function and suggest improvements for readability, performance, and best practices: def get_data(url, retries=3): import requests import time for i in range(retries):…

Claude Fable 5.1

Here's a review of the function organized by category, followed by a refactored version. ## Issues ### Correctness / robustness 1. **Bare `except:`** — This catches *everything*, including `KeyboardInterrupt`, `SystemExit`, and bugs like `KeyError` from `item["active"]`. A malformed response would be silently retried three times and then swallowed. Catch `requests.RequestException` (and `ValueError` for bad JSON) specifically. 2. **Retrying non-retryable errors** — A 404 or 400 will never succeed on retry. Only retry on transient failures (timeouts, connection errors, 5xx, 429). 3. **Silent failure** — Returning `[]` after exhausting retries is indistinguishable from "the endpoint legitima…
27.7s2028 output tokens

Claude Opus 5.5

# Code Review: `get_data` The function works in the happy path, but it has several issues that can hide bugs, waste time, and make failures hard to diagnose. ## Issues ### 🔴 Correctness and Reliability **1. The bare `except:` is the most serious problem.** It catches everything, including `KeyboardInterrupt`, `SystemExit`, and bugs in your own code. For example, if an item is missing the `"name"` key, the resulting `KeyError` gets swallowed and the request is retried as if it were a network error. The same happens with invalid JSON. Catch only the exceptions you expect, such as `requests.ConnectionError` and `requests.Timeout`. **2. Failure is indistinguishable from "no results."** Ret…
33.5s4023 output tokens

Compare on more prompts →

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5.1 or Claude Opus 5.5?
Per 1M output tokens, Claude Fable 5.1 is ¥8,935 and Claude Opus 5.5 is ¥3,462 on FastMetal (yen, before tax), so Claude Opus 5.5 is cheaper.
How do the context windows of Claude Fable 5.1 and Claude Opus 5.5 compare?
Claude Fable 5.1 takes 1,000,000 tokens; Claude Opus 5.5 takes 1,000,000.
Can I use Claude Fable 5.1 and Claude Opus 5.5 with the same API key?
Yes. On FastMetal's OpenAI-compatible endpoint, switch by passing "anthropic-claude-fable-5-1" or "anthropic-claude-opus-5-5" as the model. Each is billed at its own rate from the same prepaid balance.

Try both on one API key

Create an account and add credit to call Claude Fable 5.1 and Claude Opus 5.5 from the browser chat and the API. No monthly fee.

More comparisons with Claude Fable 5.1

More comparisons with Claude Opus 5.5