Claude Opus 4.6 vs GPT-5.6 Terra
Pricing, context window and real answers (August 2026)
Claude Opus 4.6 (Anthropic) and GPT-5.6 Terra (OpenAI), compared as you can actually call them on FastMetal. Both are served from the same OpenAI-compatible endpoint and API key; switching is a change to the model string.
Specs and pricing
 Claude Opus 4.6 |  GPT-5.6 Terra | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | OpenAI |
| Input (per 1M tokens) | ¥850 | ¥357.4 |
| Output (per 1M tokens) | ¥4,200 | ¥2,144.4 |
| Typical cost (1,000 in + 500 out tokens × 1,000 calls) | ¥2,950 | ¥1,430 |
| Context window | 1,000,000 tokens | 1,050,000 tokens |
| Release date | 2/4/2026 | 7/9/2026 |
| Input modalities | text, image | file, image, text |
| Arena · overall | #5 · ELO 1,497 | #42 · ELO 1,466 |
| Arena · Japanese | #16 · ELO 1,482 | #19 · ELO 1,474 |
| Arena · coding | #5 · ELO 1,546 | #31 · ELO 1,519 |
Prices are FastMetal's yen rates before tax. Arena ranks are as of the latest leaderboard scrape.
Which should you pick?
- On price, GPT-5.6 Terra: ¥2,144.4 per 1M output tokens, 49% less than Claude Opus 4.6.
- On the Overall arena board, Claude Opus 4.6 ranks higher (#5; GPT-5.6 Terra is #42).
- On the Japanese arena board, Claude Opus 4.6 ranks higher (#16; GPT-5.6 Terra is #19).
- On the Coding arena board, Claude Opus 4.6 ranks higher (#5; GPT-5.6 Terra is #31).
- For long documents, GPT-5.6 Terra: a 1,050,000-token context window against 1,000,000 for Claude Opus 4.6.
- If in doubt, try both on the same key. Switching is a change to the model string, and each is billed at its own rate.
Real answers to the same prompts
Exactly what the FastMetal gateway returned, side by side. Not benchmark scores: actual output.
Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'
Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'. Explain your reasoning step by step.
Claude Opus 4.6
I need to count the number of 'r's in the word 'strawberry'. Let me go through it letter by letter.
**s** - not an r
**t** - not an r
**r** - this is an r ✓ (count: 1)
**a** - not an r
**w** - not an r
**b** - not an r
**e** - not an r
**r** - this is an r ✓ (count: 2)
**r** - this is an r ✓ (count: 3)
**y** - not an r
There are **3** r's in 'strawberry'.
3.2s158 output tokens
GPT-5.6 Terra
“strawberry” is spelled:
s t **r** a w b e **r** **r** y
There are **3** occurrences of the letter **r**.
3.6s71 output tokens
Debug This Error
I'm getting the following error in my Node.js application: TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map') at UserList (/app/components/UserList.js:12:25) at renderWithHooks (/app/node_modules/rea…
Claude Opus 4.6
# Understanding the Error
The error `Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map')` means that **`users` is `undefined`** when the component renders. You're trying to call `.map()` on a value that doesn't exist yet.
This typically happens when:
- The parent component doesn't pass the `users` prop
- The data is being fetched asynchronously and hasn't loaded yet
- The prop name is misspelled
## Solutions
### 1. Add a Default Parameter Value (Simplest Fix)
```javascript
function UserList({ users = [] }) {
return (
<ul>
{users.map(user => <li key={user.id}>{user.name}</li>)}
</ul>
);
}
```
### 2. Add a Guard with Optional Chaining
```javascript
function UserList({…
10.5s599 output tokens
GPT-5.6 Terra
The error means `users` is `undefined` when `UserList` renders, so React tries to evaluate:
```js
users.map(...)
```
But `.map()` only exists on arrays.
Common causes:
- The parent component does not pass a `users` prop.
- The user data is loaded asynchronously and has not arrived on the first render.
- The API response shape differs from what you expect, e.g. data is in `response.data.users` rather than `response.data`.
- The parent initializes its user state as `undefined` or `null`.
## Fix options
### 1. Initialize users as an empty array
In the parent component:
```jsx
const [users, setUsers] = useState([]);
```
Then pass it normally:
```jsx
<UserList users={users} />
```
An e…
5.8s559 output tokens
Code Review
Please review the following Python function and suggest improvements for readability, performance, and best practices: def get_data(url, retries=3): import requests import time for i in range(retries):…
Claude Opus 4.6
# Code Review: `get_data` Function
## Original Issues Identified
1. **Imports inside function** – reduces clarity and adds per-call overhead
2. **Bare `except`** – catches everything including `KeyboardInterrupt` and `SystemExit`
3. **`== True` comparison** – non-Pythonic
4. **Manual list building** – could use a list comprehension
5. **No logging** – failures happen silently
6. **No response validation** – assumes JSON is always a list of dicts with specific keys
7. **Magic numbers** – `timeout=10`, `sleep(2)` unexplained
8. **Vague function/variable names** – `r`, `data`, `get_data`
---
## Improved Version
```python
import logging
import time
from typing import Any
import requests
fr…
19.9s1223 output tokens
GPT-5.6 Terra
Here are the main areas to improve:
### Issues in the original code
- **Imports inside the function**: Move `requests` and `time` imports to module scope.
- **Bare `except:`**: This catches everything, including `KeyboardInterrupt` and programming errors. Catch `requests.RequestException` (and possibly JSON decoding errors) instead.
- **Status code check**: Prefer `response.raise_for_status()` or `response.ok` over manually checking only for `200`. Successful responses can include other 2xx status codes.
- **`== True`**: Use `if item.get("active"):` instead.
- **Potential `KeyError`**: `item["name"]`, `item["id"]`, and `item["active"]` can fail if the API response is incomplete. Use `.get(…
10.6s939 output tokens
Frequently asked questions
- Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.6 or GPT-5.6 Terra?
- Per 1M output tokens, Claude Opus 4.6 is ¥4,200 and GPT-5.6 Terra is ¥2,144.4 on FastMetal (yen, before tax), so GPT-5.6 Terra is cheaper.
- How do the context windows of Claude Opus 4.6 and GPT-5.6 Terra compare?
- Claude Opus 4.6 takes 1,000,000 tokens; GPT-5.6 Terra takes 1,050,000.
- Which ranks higher, Claude Opus 4.6 or GPT-5.6 Terra?
- Claude Opus 4.6 ranks higher on the public arena (Claude Opus 4.6 #16, GPT-5.6 Terra #19). Ranks move as the leaderboard updates.
- Can I use Claude Opus 4.6 and GPT-5.6 Terra with the same API key?
- Yes. On FastMetal's OpenAI-compatible endpoint, switch by passing "anthropic-claude-opus-4-6" or "gpt-5.6-terra" as the model. Each is billed at its own rate from the same prepaid balance.
Try both on one API key
Create an account and add credit to call Claude Opus 4.6 and GPT-5.6 Terra from the browser chat and the API. No monthly fee.