Claude Opus 4.6 vs Claude Sonnet 5.5
Pricing, context window and real answers (September 2026)
Claude Opus 4.6 (Anthropic) and Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Anthropic), compared as you can actually call them on FastMetal. Both are served from the same OpenAI-compatible endpoint and API key; switching is a change to the model string.
Specs and pricing
 Claude Opus 4.6 | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Anthropic |
| Input (per 1M tokens) | ¥850 | ¥357.4 |
| Output (per 1M tokens) | ¥4,200 | ¥1,787 |
| Typical cost (1,000 in + 500 out tokens × 1,000 calls) | ¥2,950 | ¥1,251 |
| Context window | 1,000,000 tokens | 1,000,000 tokens |
| Release date | 2/4/2026 | 9/28/2026 |
| Input modalities | text, image | text, image, file |
| Throughput (p50) | 153 tokens/s (n=17) | — |
| Arena · overall | #6 · ELO 1,498 | Unranked |
| Arena · Japanese | #18 · ELO 1,478 | Unranked |
| Arena · coding | #4 · ELO 1,548 | Unranked |
Prices are FastMetal's yen rates before tax.
Rankings: LMArena leaderboard dataset (lmarena-ai/leaderboard-dataset), CC BY 4.0, snapshot 2026-09-25; category names mapped and ratings rounded by FastMetal.
Which should you pick?
- On price, Claude Sonnet 5.5: ¥1,787 per 1M output tokens, 57% less than Claude Opus 4.6.
- If in doubt, try both on the same key. Switching is a change to the model string, and each is billed at its own rate.
Real answers to the same prompts
Exactly what the FastMetal gateway returned, side by side. Not benchmark scores: actual output.
Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'
Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'. Explain your reasoning step by step.
Claude Opus 4.6
I need to count the number of 'r's in the word 'strawberry'. Let me go through it letter by letter.
**s** - not an r
**t** - not an r
**r** - this is an r ✓ (count: 1)
**a** - not an r
**w** - not an r
**b** - not an r
**e** - not an r
**r** - this is an r ✓ (count: 2)
**r** - this is an r ✓ (count: 3)
**y** - not an r
There are **3** r's in 'strawberry'.
3.2s158 output tokens
Claude Sonnet 5.5
Let me go through the word letter by letter.
**strawberry**
| Position | Letter |
|---|---|
| 1 | s |
| 2 | t |
| 3 | **r** ← 1st |
| 4 | a |
| 5 | w |
| 6 | b |
| 7 | e |
| 8 | **r** ← 2nd |
| 9 | **r** ← 3rd |
| 10 | y |
**Step-by-step reasoning:**
1. I split the word into individual letters: s-t-r-a-w-b-e-r-r-y (10 letters total).
2. I checked each letter for 'r'.
3. The first 'r' is in position 3, in "str…".
4. The second and third 'r's are in positions 8 and 9, in the "…rry" ending.
**Answer: There are 3 r's in "strawberry".**
A common mistake is to see "berry" as having only one 'r' (or to treat the double-r as a single letter), which leads to the incorrect answer of 2.
3.1s332 output tokens
Debug This Error
I'm getting the following error in my Node.js application: TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map') at UserList (/app/components/UserList.js:12:25) at renderWithHooks (/app/node_modules/rea…
Claude Opus 4.6
# Understanding the Error
The error `Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map')` means that **`users` is `undefined`** when the component renders. You're trying to call `.map()` on a value that doesn't exist yet.
This typically happens when:
- The parent component doesn't pass the `users` prop
- The data is being fetched asynchronously and hasn't loaded yet
- The prop name is misspelled
## Solutions
### 1. Add a Default Parameter Value (Simplest Fix)
```javascript
function UserList({ users = [] }) {
return (
<ul>
{users.map(user => <li key={user.id}>{user.name}</li>)}
</ul>
);
}
```
### 2. Add a Guard with Optional Chaining
```javascript
function UserList({…
10.5s599 output tokens
Claude Sonnet 5.5
## Cause
`users` is `undefined` when the component renders, so `users.map(...)` throws. This happens when:
1. **The parent doesn't pass the prop**, or passes it under a different name (e.g. `<UserList data={x} />` or a typo like `user=`).
2. **The data loads asynchronously.** On the first render, the state or fetch result hasn't arrived yet.
3. **The value is wrong.** For example, the API returns `{ users: [...] }` and you passed the whole object, or you're reading a property that doesn't exist (`response.data.users` vs `response.users`).
## Fixes
### 1. Default value (simplest)
```jsx
function UserList({ users = [] }) {
return (
<ul>
{users.map(user => <li key={user.id}>{use…
6.7s824 output tokens
Code Review
Please review the following Python function and suggest improvements for readability, performance, and best practices: def get_data(url, retries=3): import requests import time for i in range(retries):…
Claude Opus 4.6
# Code Review: `get_data` Function
## Original Issues Identified
1. **Imports inside function** – reduces clarity and adds per-call overhead
2. **Bare `except`** – catches everything including `KeyboardInterrupt` and `SystemExit`
3. **`== True` comparison** – non-Pythonic
4. **Manual list building** – could use a list comprehension
5. **No logging** – failures happen silently
6. **No response validation** – assumes JSON is always a list of dicts with specific keys
7. **Magic numbers** – `timeout=10`, `sleep(2)` unexplained
8. **Vague function/variable names** – `r`, `data`, `get_data`
---
## Improved Version
```python
import logging
import time
from typing import Any
import requests
fr…
19.9s1223 output tokens
Claude Sonnet 5.5
# Code Review
## Main Issues
### 1. Bare `except:` hides bugs (most important)
It catches everything, including `KeyboardInterrupt` and `SystemExit`. It also wraps your parsing logic, so a missing `"active"` key (`KeyError`) or bad JSON is treated as a network failure, retried 3 times with sleeps, and then silently becomes `[]`. Catch only `requests.RequestException`, and keep parsing outside the `try`.
### 2. Silent failure
Returning `[]` after all retries fails is indistinguishable from "the server returned no active items." Callers can't tell whether something went wrong. Raise an exception (or at least log) once retries are exhausted.
### 3. Retry logic
- It sleeps after the final at…
20.9s3003 output tokens
Frequently asked questions
- Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.6 or Claude Sonnet 5.5?
- Per 1M output tokens, Claude Opus 4.6 is ¥4,200 and Claude Sonnet 5.5 is ¥1,787 on FastMetal (yen, before tax), so Claude Sonnet 5.5 is cheaper.
- How do the context windows of Claude Opus 4.6 and Claude Sonnet 5.5 compare?
- Claude Opus 4.6 takes 1,000,000 tokens; Claude Sonnet 5.5 takes 1,000,000.
- Can I use Claude Opus 4.6 and Claude Sonnet 5.5 with the same API key?
- Yes. On FastMetal's OpenAI-compatible endpoint, switch by passing "anthropic-claude-opus-4-6" or "anthropic-claude-sonnet-5-5" as the model. Each is billed at its own rate from the same prepaid balance.
Try both on one API key
Create an account and add credit to call Claude Opus 4.6 and Claude Sonnet 5.5 from the browser chat and the API. No monthly fee.