Beam 1.0 501B A23B vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Pricing, context window and real answers (October 2026)
Beam 1.0 501B A23B (Reflection AI) and MiMo-V2.6-Flash (Xiaomi), compared as you can actually call them on FastMetal. Both are served from the same OpenAI-compatible endpoint and API key; switching is a change to the model string.
Specs and pricing
| Beam 1.0 501B A23B | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Reflection AI | Xiaomi |
| Input (per 1M tokens) | $0.422 | $0.1477 |
| Output (per 1M tokens) | $1.27 | $0.2954 |
| Typical cost (1,000 in + 500 out tokens × 1,000 calls) | $1.06 | $0.2954 |
| Context window | 1,048,576 tokens | 1,048,576 tokens |
| Release date | 10/16/2026 | 9/21/2026 |
| Input modalities | text | text, image, video, audio |
| Throughput (p50) | — | 102 tokens/s (n=25) |
| Arena · overall | Unranked | #77 · ELO 1,451 |
| Arena · Japanese | Unranked | #126 · ELO 1,358 |
| Arena · coding | Unranked | #51 · ELO 1,513 |
Prices are FastMetal's rates, before tax.
Rankings: LMArena leaderboard dataset (lmarena-ai/leaderboard-dataset), CC BY 4.0, snapshot 2026-10-15; category names mapped and ratings rounded by FastMetal.
Which should you pick?
- On price, MiMo-V2.6-Flash: $0.2954 per 1M output tokens, 77% less than Beam 1.0 501B A23B.
- If in doubt, try both on the same key. Switching is a change to the model string, and each is billed at its own rate.
Real answers to the same prompts
Exactly what the FastMetal gateway returned, side by side. Not benchmark scores: actual output.
Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'
Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'. Explain your reasoning step by step.
Beam 1.0 501B A23B
The word “strawberry” is spelled:
s - t - r - a - w - b - e - r - r - y
The letter “r” appears in these positions:
- s**r**awberry (1st r)
- strawbe**r**ry (2nd r)
- strawber**r**y (3rd r)
Therefore, there are **3** r's in “strawberry.”
7.6s278 output tokens
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
## Counting the 'r's in 'strawberry'
**Step 1: Write out each letter of the word individually:**
`s - t - r - a - w - b - e - r - r - y`
**Step 2: Go through each letter one by one and check if it's an 'r':**
| Position | Letter | Is it 'r'? | Running Count |
|----------|--------|------------|---------------|
| 1 | s | ❌ | 0 |
| 2 | t | ❌ | 0 |
| 3 | **r** | ✅ | **1** |
| 4 | a | ❌ | 1 |
| 5 | w | ❌ | 1 |
| 6 | b | ❌ | 1 |
| 7 | e | ❌ | 1 |
| 8 | **r** | ✅ | **2** |
| 9 | **r** | ✅ | **3** |
| 10 | y | ❌ | 3 |
**Answer: There are 3 'r's in 'strawberry'.** 🍓
The first 'r' appears at position 3 (after "st"), and the remaining two are the double 'rr' near the end of the word.
6.5s379 output tokens
Debug This Error
I'm getting the following error in my Node.js application: TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map') at UserList (/app/components/UserList.js:12:25) at renderWithHooks (/app/node_modules/rea…
Beam 1.0 501B A23B
The error means `users` is `undefined` when `UserList` renders, so calling `.map` on `undefined` throws.
### Common causes
1. Parent renders `<UserList />` without a `users` prop.
2. Parent passes `users={data}` where `data` is still `undefined` (e.g., fetch not resolved).
3. Destructured prop name mismatch.
### Fixes
**1. Default the prop**
```js
function UserList({ users = [] }) {
return (
<ul>
{users.map(user => <li key={user.id}>{user.name}</li>)}
</ul>
);
}
```
**2. Guard in JSX**
```js
{Array.isArray(users) && users.map(user => <li key={user.id}>{user.name}</li>)}
```
**3. Optional chaining**
```js
{users?.map(user => <li key={user.id}>{user.name}</li>)}
```
Note…
12.8s414 output tokens
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
## Cause of the Error
The error occurs because the `users` prop is `undefined` when the component first renders. When you try to call `.map()` on `undefined`, it throws:
```
TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map')
```
This typically happens when:
1. The **parent component** hasn't passed `users` yet (e.g., data is still loading from an API)
2. The prop name **doesn't match** between parent and child
3. The prop is **intentionally optional** but used unconditionally
## Fixes
### 1. Default parameter value (simplest fix)
Set a default value for `users` so it's always an array:
```js
function UserList({ users = [] }) {
return (
<ul>
{users.map(user =>…
7.6s547 output tokens
Code Review
Please review the following Python function and suggest improvements for readability, performance, and best practices: def get_data(url, retries=3): import requests import time for i in range(retries):…
Beam 1.0 501B A23B
Here are some key issues and improvements:
### Main issues in the original
- **Imports inside the function** run on every call and hurt readability.
- **Bare `except:`** catches `KeyboardInterrupt`, `SystemExit`, and programming errors.
- **Retries every non-200 response**, including `404`/`400`, which usually should not be retried.
- **`item["active"] == True`** can raise `KeyError` and is stricter than necessary unless you truly need exact boolean equality.
- **Fixed sleep and unnecessary final sleep** before returning.
- **Repeated `item["name"]` / `item["id"]`** lookups are slightly slower and less clean than a comprehension.
- No handling/validation for malformed JSON or non-list respo…
16.8s1927 output tokens
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
# Code Review: `get_data`
## Issues Identified
| Category | Issue |
|----------|-------|
| **Readability** | Imports inside function, vague names (`i`, `r`), no docstring/type hints |
| **Performance** | Manual loop instead of list comprehension, no `requests.Session` (no connection reuse) |
| **Best Practices** | Bare `except`, `== True`, silent failures, no backoff, no error propagation |
---
## Improved Version
```python
import time
import logging
import requests
from typing import Optional
logger = logging.getLogger(__name__)
def get_data(
url: str,
retries: int = 3,
timeout: float = 10,
backoff_factor: float = 2.0,
) -> Optional[list[dict]]:
"""
Fetch dat…
18.9s1208 output tokens
Frequently asked questions
- Which is cheaper, Beam 1.0 501B A23B or MiMo-V2.6-Flash?
- Per 1M output tokens, Beam 1.0 501B A23B is $1.27 and MiMo-V2.6-Flash is $0.2954 on FastMetal (US dollars, before tax), so MiMo-V2.6-Flash is cheaper.
- How do the context windows of Beam 1.0 501B A23B and MiMo-V2.6-Flash compare?
- Beam 1.0 501B A23B takes 1,048,576 tokens; MiMo-V2.6-Flash takes 1,048,576.
- Can I use Beam 1.0 501B A23B and MiMo-V2.6-Flash with the same API key?
- Yes. On FastMetal's OpenAI-compatible endpoint, switch by passing "beam-1.0" or "mimo-v2.6-flash" as the model. Each is billed at its own rate from the same prepaid balance.
Try both on one API key
Create an account and add credit to call Beam 1.0 501B A23B and MiMo-V2.6-Flash from the browser chat and the API. No monthly fee.