Beam 1.0 501B A23B vs Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Pricing, context window and real answers (October 2026)
Beam 1.0 501B A23B (Reflection AI) and Llama 3.3 70B Instruct (Meta), compared as you can actually call them on FastMetal. Both are served from the same OpenAI-compatible endpoint and API key; switching is a change to the model string.
Specs and pricing
| Beam 1.0 501B A23B |  Llama 3.3 70B Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Reflection AI | Meta |
| Input (per 1M tokens) | $0.422 | $0.1055 |
| Output (per 1M tokens) | $1.27 | $0.3376 |
| Typical cost (1,000 in + 500 out tokens × 1,000 calls) | $1.06 | $0.2743 |
| Context window | 1,048,576 tokens | 131,072 tokens |
| Release date | 10/16/2026 | 12/6/2024 |
| Input modalities | text | text |
| Throughput (p50) | — | 20 tokens/s (n=25) |
| Arena · overall | Unranked | #264 · ELO 1,318 |
| Arena · Japanese | Unranked | #224 · ELO 1,214 |
| Arena · coding | Unranked | #277 · ELO 1,346 |
Prices are FastMetal's rates, before tax.
Rankings: LMArena leaderboard dataset (lmarena-ai/leaderboard-dataset), CC BY 4.0, snapshot 2026-10-15; category names mapped and ratings rounded by FastMetal.
Which should you pick?
- On price, Llama 3.3 70B Instruct: $0.3376 per 1M output tokens, 73% less than Beam 1.0 501B A23B.
- For long documents, Beam 1.0 501B A23B: a 1,048,576-token context window against 131,072 for Llama 3.3 70B Instruct.
- If in doubt, try both on the same key. Switching is a change to the model string, and each is billed at its own rate.
Real answers to the same prompts
Exactly what the FastMetal gateway returned, side by side. Not benchmark scores: actual output.
Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'
Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'. Explain your reasoning step by step.
Beam 1.0 501B A23B
The word “strawberry” is spelled:
s - t - r - a - w - b - e - r - r - y
The letter “r” appears in these positions:
- s**r**awberry (1st r)
- strawbe**r**ry (2nd r)
- strawber**r**y (3rd r)
Therefore, there are **3** r's in “strawberry.”
7.6s278 output tokens
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
To count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry', I'll break down the word into its individual letters and then examine each one to identify the 'r's. Here are the steps:
1. **Write down the word 'strawberry' with its individual letters separated**: s-t-r-a-w-b-e-r-r-y
2. **Examine each letter to find the 'r's**: Going through the word letter by letter, I identify the 'r's.
- The first 'r' appears after 't', so that's one 'r'.
- Continuing through the word, I find another 'r' after 'e', which gives me a second 'r'.
- Then, immediately after this second 'r', I find a third 'r'.
3. **Count the total number of 'r's identified**: From the step above, I've identified a total of 3 'r's in th…
12.6s217 output tokens
Debug This Error
I'm getting the following error in my Node.js application: TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map') at UserList (/app/components/UserList.js:12:25) at renderWithHooks (/app/node_modules/rea…
Beam 1.0 501B A23B
The error means `users` is `undefined` when `UserList` renders, so calling `.map` on `undefined` throws.
### Common causes
1. Parent renders `<UserList />` without a `users` prop.
2. Parent passes `users={data}` where `data` is still `undefined` (e.g., fetch not resolved).
3. Destructured prop name mismatch.
### Fixes
**1. Default the prop**
```js
function UserList({ users = [] }) {
return (
<ul>
{users.map(user => <li key={user.id}>{user.name}</li>)}
</ul>
);
}
```
**2. Guard in JSX**
```js
{Array.isArray(users) && users.map(user => <li key={user.id}>{user.name}</li>)}
```
**3. Optional chaining**
```js
{users?.map(user => <li key={user.id}>{user.name}</li>)}
```
Note…
12.8s414 output tokens
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
# Step-by-step analysis of the problem:
1. **The error is occurring because the `map()` function is being called on `undefined`**: This means that the `users` prop is not being passed to the `UserList` component, or its value is `undefined`.
2. **The `map()` function is a method of arrays**: It is used to iterate over the elements of an array and apply a transformation to each element. If `users` is not an array (i.e., it's `undefined`), this method will not be available, hence the error.
3. **To fix this error, you need to ensure that `users` is always an array**: You can achieve this by adding a conditional statement to check if `users` is an array before calling `map()` on it.
# Fixed so…
28.4s560 output tokens
Code Review
Please review the following Python function and suggest improvements for readability, performance, and best practices: def get_data(url, retries=3): import requests import time for i in range(retries):…
Beam 1.0 501B A23B
Here are some key issues and improvements:
### Main issues in the original
- **Imports inside the function** run on every call and hurt readability.
- **Bare `except:`** catches `KeyboardInterrupt`, `SystemExit`, and programming errors.
- **Retries every non-200 response**, including `404`/`400`, which usually should not be retried.
- **`item["active"] == True`** can raise `KeyError` and is stricter than necessary unless you truly need exact boolean equality.
- **Fixed sleep and unnecessary final sleep** before returning.
- **Repeated `item["name"]` / `item["id"]`** lookups are slightly slower and less clean than a comprehension.
- No handling/validation for malformed JSON or non-list respo…
16.8s1927 output tokens
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
### Review and Suggestions
The provided Python function `get_data` appears to be designed to fetch data from a given URL, filter active items, and return the filtered results. Here's a review of the function focusing on readability, performance, and best practices, along with suggestions for improvement.
#### Issues and Improvements:
1. **Import Statements**: Import statements should be placed at the top of the file, not inside the function. This adheres to PEP 8, the official Python style guide.
2. **Exception Handling**: The `except` block is too broad. It's better to catch specific exceptions that you anticipate might occur. For example, `requests.get` might raise `requests.RequestExc…
40.3s815 output tokens
Frequently asked questions
- Which is cheaper, Beam 1.0 501B A23B or Llama 3.3 70B Instruct?
- Per 1M output tokens, Beam 1.0 501B A23B is $1.27 and Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is $0.3376 on FastMetal (US dollars, before tax), so Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is cheaper.
- How do the context windows of Beam 1.0 501B A23B and Llama 3.3 70B Instruct compare?
- Beam 1.0 501B A23B takes 1,048,576 tokens; Llama 3.3 70B Instruct takes 131,072.
- Can I use Beam 1.0 501B A23B and Llama 3.3 70B Instruct with the same API key?
- Yes. On FastMetal's OpenAI-compatible endpoint, switch by passing "beam-1.0" or "llama-3.3-70b-instruct" as the model. Each is billed at its own rate from the same prepaid balance.
Try both on one API key
Create an account and add credit to call Beam 1.0 501B A23B and Llama 3.3 70B Instruct from the browser chat and the API. No monthly fee.