Model comparison

Beam 1.0 501B A23B vs Gemini 3.5 Flash

Pricing, context window and real answers (October 2026)

Beam 1.0 501B A23B (Reflection AI) and Gemini 3.5 Flash (Google), compared as you can actually call them on FastMetal. Both are served from the same OpenAI-compatible endpoint and API key; switching is a change to the model string.

Specs and pricing

Beam 1.0 501B A23Bgoogle logoGemini 3.5 Flash
ProviderReflection AIGoogle
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.422$1.65
Output (per 1M tokens)$1.27$9.90
Typical cost (1,000 in + 500 out tokens × 1,000 calls)$1.06$6.60
Context window1,048,576 tokens1,048,576 tokens
Release date10/16/20265/19/2026
Input modalitiestexttext, image, video, file, audio
Throughput (p50)—582 tokens/s (n=26)
Arena · overallUnranked#29 · ELO 1,477
Arena · JapaneseUnranked#20 · ELO 1,479
Arena · codingUnranked#61 · ELO 1,508

Prices are FastMetal's rates, before tax.

Rankings: LMArena leaderboard dataset (lmarena-ai/leaderboard-dataset), CC BY 4.0, snapshot 2026-10-15; category names mapped and ratings rounded by FastMetal.

Which should you pick?

  • On price, Beam 1.0 501B A23B: $1.27 per 1M output tokens, 87% less than Gemini 3.5 Flash.
  • If in doubt, try both on the same key. Switching is a change to the model string, and each is billed at its own rate.

Real answers to the same prompts

Exactly what the FastMetal gateway returned, side by side. Not benchmark scores: actual output.

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'. Explain your reasoning step by step.

Beam 1.0 501B A23B

The word “strawberry” is spelled: s - t - r - a - w - b - e - r - r - y The letter “r” appears in these positions: - s**r**awberry (1st r) - strawbe**r**ry (2nd r) - strawber**r**y (3rd r) Therefore, there are **3** r's in “strawberry.”
7.6s278 output tokens

Gemini 3.5 Flash

There are **3** 'r's in the word "strawberry". Here is the step-by-step breakdown of how to count them: 1. **Break the word down into its individual letters:** * 1st letter: **s** * 2nd letter: **t** * 3rd letter: **r** (First 'r') * 4th letter: **a** * 5th letter: **w** * 6th letter: **b** * 7th letter: **e** * 8th letter: **r** (Second 'r') * 9th letter: **r** (Third 'r') * 10th letter: **y** 2. **Identify and count only the 'r's:** * s - t - **r** (1) - a - w - b - e - **r** (2) - **r** (3) - y By counting them as we go through the word, we find a total of **3** 'r's.
4.8s601 output tokens

Debug This Error

I'm getting the following error in my Node.js application: TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map') at UserList (/app/components/UserList.js:12:25) at renderWithHooks (/app/node_modules/rea…

Beam 1.0 501B A23B

The error means `users` is `undefined` when `UserList` renders, so calling `.map` on `undefined` throws. ### Common causes 1. Parent renders `<UserList />` without a `users` prop. 2. Parent passes `users={data}` where `data` is still `undefined` (e.g., fetch not resolved). 3. Destructured prop name mismatch. ### Fixes **1. Default the prop** ```js function UserList({ users = [] }) { return ( <ul> {users.map(user => <li key={user.id}>{user.name}</li>)} </ul> ); } ``` **2. Guard in JSX** ```js {Array.isArray(users) && users.map(user => <li key={user.id}>{user.name}</li>)} ``` **3. Optional chaining** ```js {users?.map(user => <li key={user.id}>{user.name}</li>)} ``` Note…
12.8s414 output tokens

Gemini 3.5 Flash

### What is causing this error? The error `TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map')` means that your `UserList` component is trying to call `.map()` on the `users` variable, but **`users` is currently `undefined`**. This usually happens for one of two reasons: 1. **The parent component forgot to pass the prop:** `<UserList />` was rendered without the `users` attribute. 2. **Asynchronous data fetching:** The parent component fetches the users from an API, but the API request hasn't finished yet when the component first renders, so `users` starts as `undefined`. --- ### How to fix it Here are the three best ways to fix this, depending on how you want your UI to beh…
11.2s1524 output tokens

Code Review

Please review the following Python function and suggest improvements for readability, performance, and best practices: def get_data(url, retries=3): import requests import time for i in range(retries):…

Beam 1.0 501B A23B

Here are some key issues and improvements: ### Main issues in the original - **Imports inside the function** run on every call and hurt readability. - **Bare `except:`** catches `KeyboardInterrupt`, `SystemExit`, and programming errors. - **Retries every non-200 response**, including `404`/`400`, which usually should not be retried. - **`item["active"] == True`** can raise `KeyError` and is stricter than necessary unless you truly need exact boolean equality. - **Fixed sleep and unnecessary final sleep** before returning. - **Repeated `item["name"]` / `item["id"]`** lookups are slightly slower and less clean than a comprehension. - No handling/validation for malformed JSON or non-list respo…
16.8s1927 output tokens

Gemini 3.5 Flash

Here is a review of your function, followed by two improved versions (one that keeps your structure but makes it Pythonic, and one production-ready version that uses industry best practices). --- ### Key Areas for Improvement 1. **Imports inside the function:** `import requests` and `import time` should be at the top of the file (PEP 8). Keeping them inside the function slows down execution if the function is called repeatedly. 2. **Bare `except:` clause:** Using `except:` without specifying an exception type is a major anti-pattern. It catches things you don't want to catch, like `KeyboardInterrupt` (Ctrl+C) or `SystemExit`. It should target `requests.RequestException`. 3. **Implicit `Tr…
19.7s2975 output tokens

Compare on more prompts →

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Beam 1.0 501B A23B or Gemini 3.5 Flash?
Per 1M output tokens, Beam 1.0 501B A23B is $1.27 and Gemini 3.5 Flash is $9.90 on FastMetal (US dollars, before tax), so Beam 1.0 501B A23B is cheaper.
How do the context windows of Beam 1.0 501B A23B and Gemini 3.5 Flash compare?
Beam 1.0 501B A23B takes 1,048,576 tokens; Gemini 3.5 Flash takes 1,048,576.
Can I use Beam 1.0 501B A23B and Gemini 3.5 Flash with the same API key?
Yes. On FastMetal's OpenAI-compatible endpoint, switch by passing "beam-1.0" or "gemini-3.5-flash" as the model. Each is billed at its own rate from the same prepaid balance.

Try both on one API key

Create an account and add credit to call Beam 1.0 501B A23B and Gemini 3.5 Flash from the browser chat and the API. No monthly fee.

More comparisons with Beam 1.0 501B A23B

More comparisons with Gemini 3.5 Flash