Beam 1.0 501B A23B vs Claude Haiku 5.5
Pricing, context window and real answers (October 2026)
Beam 1.0 501B A23B (Reflection AI) and Claude Haiku 5.5 (Anthropic), compared as you can actually call them on FastMetal. Both are served from the same OpenAI-compatible endpoint and API key; switching is a change to the model string.
Specs and pricing
| Beam 1.0 501B A23B |  Claude Haiku 5.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Reflection AI | Anthropic |
| Input (per 1M tokens) | $0.422 | $0.1055 |
| Output (per 1M tokens) | $1.27 | $0.5275 |
| Typical cost (1,000 in + 500 out tokens × 1,000 calls) | $1.06 | $0.3693 |
| Context window | 1,048,576 tokens | 1,000,000 tokens |
| Release date | 10/16/2026 | 10/7/2026 |
| Input modalities | text | text, image, file |
| Throughput (p50) | — | — |
| Arena · overall | Unranked | Unranked |
| Arena · Japanese | Unranked | Unranked |
| Arena · coding | Unranked | Unranked |
Prices are FastMetal's rates, before tax.
Rankings: LMArena leaderboard dataset (lmarena-ai/leaderboard-dataset), CC BY 4.0, snapshot 2026-10-15; category names mapped and ratings rounded by FastMetal.
Which should you pick?
- On price, Claude Haiku 5.5: $0.5275 per 1M output tokens, 58% less than Beam 1.0 501B A23B.
- For long documents, Beam 1.0 501B A23B: a 1,048,576-token context window against 1,000,000 for Claude Haiku 5.5.
- If in doubt, try both on the same key. Switching is a change to the model string, and each is billed at its own rate.
Real answers to the same prompts
Exactly what the FastMetal gateway returned, side by side. Not benchmark scores: actual output.
Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'
Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'. Explain your reasoning step by step.
Beam 1.0 501B A23B
The word “strawberry” is spelled:
s - t - r - a - w - b - e - r - r - y
The letter “r” appears in these positions:
- s**r**awberry (1st r)
- strawbe**r**ry (2nd r)
- strawber**r**y (3rd r)
Therefore, there are **3** r's in “strawberry.”
7.6s278 output tokens
Claude Haiku 5.5
There are **3** r's in "strawberry."
1. **Spell out the word:** s, t, r, a, w, b, e, r, r, y
2. **Go through each letter and count the r's:**
- Position 3: **r** (count = 1)
- Position 8: **r** (count = 2)
- Position 9: **r** (count = 3)
3. **Check the rest:** s, t, a, w, b, e, and y are not r's.
Total: **3**
2.4s200 output tokens
Debug This Error
I'm getting the following error in my Node.js application: TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map') at UserList (/app/components/UserList.js:12:25) at renderWithHooks (/app/node_modules/rea…
Beam 1.0 501B A23B
The error means `users` is `undefined` when `UserList` renders, so calling `.map` on `undefined` throws.
### Common causes
1. Parent renders `<UserList />` without a `users` prop.
2. Parent passes `users={data}` where `data` is still `undefined` (e.g., fetch not resolved).
3. Destructured prop name mismatch.
### Fixes
**1. Default the prop**
```js
function UserList({ users = [] }) {
return (
<ul>
{users.map(user => <li key={user.id}>{user.name}</li>)}
</ul>
);
}
```
**2. Guard in JSX**
```js
{Array.isArray(users) && users.map(user => <li key={user.id}>{user.name}</li>)}
```
**3. Optional chaining**
```js
{users?.map(user => <li key={user.id}>{user.name}</li>)}
```
Note…
12.8s414 output tokens
Claude Haiku 5.5
The error means `users` is `undefined` when `UserList` renders, so `.map` is called on nothing. The component destructures the `users` prop, but the parent didn't pass it, or passed `undefined`.
## Common causes
**1. The parent doesn't pass the prop, or uses a different name**
```jsx
<UserList /> // users is undefined
<UserList user={users} /> // wrong name: "user" instead of "users"
```
**2. The data hasn't loaded yet (most common with fetched data)**
```jsx
function App() {
const [users, setUsers] = useState(); // undefined initially
useEffect(() => {
fetch('/api/users').then(r => r.json()).then(setUsers);
}, []);
return <UserList users={users} />;…
5.1s888 output tokens
Code Review
Please review the following Python function and suggest improvements for readability, performance, and best practices: def get_data(url, retries=3): import requests import time for i in range(retries):…
Beam 1.0 501B A23B
Here are some key issues and improvements:
### Main issues in the original
- **Imports inside the function** run on every call and hurt readability.
- **Bare `except:`** catches `KeyboardInterrupt`, `SystemExit`, and programming errors.
- **Retries every non-200 response**, including `404`/`400`, which usually should not be retried.
- **`item["active"] == True`** can raise `KeyError` and is stricter than necessary unless you truly need exact boolean equality.
- **Fixed sleep and unnecessary final sleep** before returning.
- **Repeated `item["name"]` / `item["id"]`** lookups are slightly slower and less clean than a comprehension.
- No handling/validation for malformed JSON or non-list respo…
16.8s1927 output tokens
Claude Haiku 5.5
## Issues
**Correctness and robustness**
1. **Bare `except:`** catches everything, including `KeyboardInterrupt` and `SystemExit`, so Ctrl+C may not stop the program. Catch specific exceptions: `requests.RequestException` for network problems and `ValueError` for invalid JSON.
2. **Retries non-retryable errors.** A 404 or 401 won't succeed on retry, so retrying wastes time. Only retry transient failures such as 429, 5xx, timeouts, and connection errors.
3. **Sleeps after the final attempt.** The loop sleeps even when no retry follows.
4. **Fixed sleep with no backoff.** Exponential backoff is the standard approach for retries.
5. **Silent failure.** Every failure returns `[]` with no loggin…
18.1s4096 output tokens
Frequently asked questions
- Which is cheaper, Beam 1.0 501B A23B or Claude Haiku 5.5?
- Per 1M output tokens, Beam 1.0 501B A23B is $1.27 and Claude Haiku 5.5 is $0.5275 on FastMetal (US dollars, before tax), so Claude Haiku 5.5 is cheaper.
- How do the context windows of Beam 1.0 501B A23B and Claude Haiku 5.5 compare?
- Beam 1.0 501B A23B takes 1,048,576 tokens; Claude Haiku 5.5 takes 1,000,000.
- Can I use Beam 1.0 501B A23B and Claude Haiku 5.5 with the same API key?
- Yes. On FastMetal's OpenAI-compatible endpoint, switch by passing "beam-1.0" or "anthropic-claude-haiku-5-5" as the model. Each is billed at its own rate from the same prepaid balance.
Try both on one API key
Create an account and add credit to call Beam 1.0 501B A23B and Claude Haiku 5.5 from the browser chat and the API. No monthly fee.