Model comparison

MiMo-V2.5-Pro vs MiniMax M3

Pricing, context window and real answers (August 2026)

MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Xiaomi) and MiniMax M3 (MiniMax), compared as you can actually call them on FastMetal. Both are served from the same OpenAI-compatible endpoint and API key; switching is a change to the model string.

Specs and pricing

MiMo-V2.5-Prominimax logoMiniMax M3
ProviderXiaomiMiniMax
Input (per 1M tokens)¥77.73¥53.61
Output (per 1M tokens)¥155.47¥214.44
Typical cost (1,000 in + 500 out tokens × 1,000 calls)¥155¥161
Context window1,050,000 tokens1,048,576 tokens
Release date4/22/20265/31/2026
Input modalitiestexttext, image, video
Arena · overall#38 · ELO 1,465#68 · ELO 1,444
Arena · Japanese#44 · ELO 1,422#49 · ELO 1,414
Arena · coding#26 · ELO 1,519#59 · ELO 1,498

Prices are FastMetal's yen rates before tax. Arena ranks are as of the latest leaderboard scrape.

Which should you pick?

  • On price, MiMo-V2.5-Pro: ¥155.47 per 1M output tokens, 27% less than MiniMax M3.
  • On the Overall arena board, MiMo-V2.5-Pro ranks higher (#38; MiniMax M3 is #68).
  • On the Japanese arena board, MiMo-V2.5-Pro ranks higher (#44; MiniMax M3 is #49).
  • On the Coding arena board, MiMo-V2.5-Pro ranks higher (#26; MiniMax M3 is #59).
  • For long documents, MiMo-V2.5-Pro: a 1,050,000-token context window against 1,048,576 for MiniMax M3.
  • If in doubt, try both on the same key. Switching is a change to the model string, and each is billed at its own rate.

Real answers to the same prompts

Exactly what the FastMetal gateway returned, side by side. Not benchmark scores: actual output.

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'. Explain your reasoning step by step.

MiMo-V2.5-Pro

## Counting the r's in "strawberry" Let me go through each letter one by one: | Position | Letter | Is it 'r'? | |----------|--------|------------| | 1 | s | No | | 2 | t | No | | 3 | **r** | ✅ Yes (#1) | | 4 | a | No | | 5 | w | No | | 6 | b | No | | 7 | e | No | | 8 | **r** | ✅ Yes (#2) | | 9 | **r** | ✅ Yes (#3) | | 10 | y | No | **There are 3 r's in "strawberry."** The word breaks down as **straw·ber·ry**, and the r's appear at the end of "staw" and then twice in the double-r of "rry."
8.3s313 output tokens

MiniMax M3

# Counting 'r's in "strawberry" Let me go through the word letter by letter: **s** - t - **r** - a - w - b - e - **r** - **r** - y | Position | Letter | Is it 'r'? | |----------|--------|------------| | 1 | s | No | | 2 | t | No | | 3 | **r** | ✓ (1st) | | 4 | a | No | | 5 | w | No | | 6 | b | No | | 7 | e | No | | 8 | **r** | ✓ (2nd) | | 9 | **r** | ✓ (3rd) | | 10 | y | No | ## Answer: **3** The word "strawberry" contains **three 'r's** — one at position 3, and two consecutive 'r's at positions 8 and 9.
25.6s455 output tokens

Debug This Error

I'm getting the following error in my Node.js application: TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map') at UserList (/app/components/UserList.js:12:25) at renderWithHooks (/app/node_modules/rea…

MiMo-V2.5-Pro

# Fixing `Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map')` ## The Problem The error means `users` is `undefined` when the component first renders. This typically happens when: 1. **The parent component hasn't passed the `users` prop** 2. **The data is being fetched asynchronously and isn't available yet** 3. **The prop name is misspelled in the parent** For example, the parent might be rendering it like this: ```jsx // ❌ No users prop passed — `users` will be undefined <UserList /> ``` ## Solutions ### 1. Add a Default Prop Value (Simple Fix) ```jsx function UserList({ users = [] }) { return ( <ul> {users.map(user => <li key={user.id}>{user.name}</li>)} </ul> ); }…
14.4s680 output tokens

MiniMax M3

# Error Analysis The error `Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map')` tells you that **`users` is `undefined`** when your component runs. JavaScript can't call `.map()` on `undefined`, so it throws this error. The component itself is fine syntactically — the problem is that the `users` prop isn't being passed, or hasn't loaded yet. ## Common Causes **1. The prop isn't passed at all:** ```jsx <UserList /> // No users prop → users is undefined ``` **2. Data is still loading (async fetch):** ```jsx const [users, setUsers] = useState(); // undefined initially ``` **3. API returns undefined:** ```jsx const { data } = await fetch('/api/users').then(r => r.json()); setUsers(data);…
32.8s710 output tokens

Code Review

Please review the following Python function and suggest improvements for readability, performance, and best practices: def get_data(url, retries=3): import requests import time for i in range(retries):…

MiMo-V2.5-Pro

# Code Review: `get_data` Function ## Issues Identified ``` ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ ISSUE SEVERITY MAP │ ├──────────────────┬────────────┬──────────────────────────────┤ │ Issue │ Severity │ Category │ ├──────────────────┼────────────┼──────────────────────────────┤ │ Bare except │ 🔴 High │ Error Handling / Best Prac. │ │ Silent failures │ 🔴 High │ Debuggability │ │ == True check │ 🟡 Medium │ Readability / PEP 8 │ │ Inline imports │ 🟡 Medium │ Best Practice │ │ No type hints │ 🟡 Medium │ Best Practice…
10.4s1572 output tokens

MiniMax M3

## Code Review This function works for the happy path, but it has several issues around error handling, retries, and readability. Here's a breakdown. ### 🐛 Bugs & Correctness Issues | # | Issue | Why It Matters | |---|-------|----------------| | 1 | `except:` with no exception type | Swallows `KeyboardInterrupt`, `SystemExit`, and *everything else* (typos, `MemoryError`). You lose visibility into real failures. | | 2 | Retries on every non‑200, including `4xx` | A `404` or `401` will never succeed by retrying — it just wastes time and rate-limit budget. | | 3 | `if item["active"] == True` | Both linters (PEP 8 E712) and Python idiom prefer `if item["active"]:`. | | 4 | `item["active"]` (…
33.4s3977 output tokens

Compare on more prompts →

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2.5-Pro or MiniMax M3?
Per 1M output tokens, MiMo-V2.5-Pro is ¥155.47 and MiniMax M3 is ¥214.44 on FastMetal (yen, before tax), so MiMo-V2.5-Pro is cheaper.
How do the context windows of MiMo-V2.5-Pro and MiniMax M3 compare?
MiMo-V2.5-Pro takes 1,050,000 tokens; MiniMax M3 takes 1,048,576.
Which ranks higher, MiMo-V2.5-Pro or MiniMax M3?
MiMo-V2.5-Pro ranks higher on the public arena (MiMo-V2.5-Pro #44, MiniMax M3 #49). Ranks move as the leaderboard updates.
Can I use MiMo-V2.5-Pro and MiniMax M3 with the same API key?
Yes. On FastMetal's OpenAI-compatible endpoint, switch by passing "mimo-v2.5-pro" or "minimax-m3" as the model. Each is billed at its own rate from the same prepaid balance.

Try both on one API key

Create an account and add credit to call MiMo-V2.5-Pro and MiniMax M3 from the browser chat and the API. No monthly fee.

More comparisons with MiMo-V2.5-Pro

More comparisons with MiniMax M3