Model comparison

Claude Opus 4.8 vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro

Pricing, context window and real answers (August 2026)

Claude Opus 4.8 (Anthropic) and MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Xiaomi), compared as you can actually call them on FastMetal. Both are served from the same OpenAI-compatible endpoint and API key; switching is a change to the model string.

Specs and pricing

anthropic logoClaude Opus 4.8MiMo-V2.5-Pro
ProviderAnthropicXiaomi
Input (per 1M tokens)¥893.5¥77.73
Output (per 1M tokens)¥4,467.5¥155.47
Typical cost (1,000 in + 500 out tokens × 1,000 calls)¥3,127¥155
Context window1,000,000 tokens1,050,000 tokens
Release date5/27/20264/22/2026
Input modalitiestext, image, filetext
Arena · overall#22 · ELO 1,474#38 · ELO 1,465
Arena · Japanese#26 · ELO 1,448#44 · ELO 1,422
Arena · coding#12 · ELO 1,528#26 · ELO 1,519

Prices are FastMetal's yen rates before tax. Arena ranks are as of the latest leaderboard scrape.

Which should you pick?

  • On price, MiMo-V2.5-Pro: ¥155.47 per 1M output tokens, 97% less than Claude Opus 4.8.
  • On the Overall arena board, Claude Opus 4.8 ranks higher (#22; MiMo-V2.5-Pro is #38).
  • On the Japanese arena board, Claude Opus 4.8 ranks higher (#26; MiMo-V2.5-Pro is #44).
  • On the Coding arena board, Claude Opus 4.8 ranks higher (#12; MiMo-V2.5-Pro is #26).
  • For long documents, MiMo-V2.5-Pro: a 1,050,000-token context window against 1,000,000 for Claude Opus 4.8.
  • If in doubt, try both on the same key. Switching is a change to the model string, and each is billed at its own rate.

Real answers to the same prompts

Exactly what the FastMetal gateway returned, side by side. Not benchmark scores: actual output.

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'. Explain your reasoning step by step.

Claude Opus 4.8

# Counting 'r's in "strawberry" ## Step-by-step process: Let me go through each letter one at a time: | Position | Letter | Is it 'r'? | |----------|--------|-----------| | 1 | s | No | | 2 | t | No | | 3 | r | ✓ Yes (1) | | 4 | a | No | | 5 | w | No | | 6 | b | No | | 7 | e | No | | 8 | r | ✓ Yes (2) | | 9 | r | ✓ Yes (3) | | 10 | y | No | ## Answer: There are **3** 'r's in "strawberry". The three 'r's appear at positions 3, 8, and 9 — one after the "st" and two together in the "rry" ending.
4.5s262 output tokens

MiMo-V2.5-Pro

## Counting the r's in "strawberry" Let me go through each letter one by one: | Position | Letter | Is it 'r'? | |----------|--------|------------| | 1 | s | No | | 2 | t | No | | 3 | **r** | ✅ Yes (#1) | | 4 | a | No | | 5 | w | No | | 6 | b | No | | 7 | e | No | | 8 | **r** | ✅ Yes (#2) | | 9 | **r** | ✅ Yes (#3) | | 10 | y | No | **There are 3 r's in "strawberry."** The word breaks down as **straw·ber·ry**, and the r's appear at the end of "staw" and then twice in the double-r of "rry."
8.3s313 output tokens

Debug This Error

I'm getting the following error in my Node.js application: TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map') at UserList (/app/components/UserList.js:12:25) at renderWithHooks (/app/node_modules/rea…

Claude Opus 4.8

# What's Causing the Error The error tells you exactly what's happening: ``` TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map') at UserList (/app/components/UserList.js:12:25) ``` At the moment `UserList` renders, the `users` prop is `undefined`, and you can't call `.map()` on `undefined`. This is extremely common when data is fetched asynchronously—the component renders **before** the data arrives. Common reasons `users` is undefined: - The parent hasn't passed the `users` prop at all - Data is still loading from an API (initial state is `undefined`) - The API response shape differs from what you expect (e.g. `data.users` vs `data`) --- # How to Fix It ## Option 1: De…
11.3s761 output tokens

MiMo-V2.5-Pro

# Fixing `Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map')` ## The Problem The error means `users` is `undefined` when the component first renders. This typically happens when: 1. **The parent component hasn't passed the `users` prop** 2. **The data is being fetched asynchronously and isn't available yet** 3. **The prop name is misspelled in the parent** For example, the parent might be rendering it like this: ```jsx // ❌ No users prop passed — `users` will be undefined <UserList /> ``` ## Solutions ### 1. Add a Default Prop Value (Simple Fix) ```jsx function UserList({ users = [] }) { return ( <ul> {users.map(user => <li key={user.id}>{user.name}</li>)} </ul> ); }…
14.4s680 output tokens

Code Review

Please review the following Python function and suggest improvements for readability, performance, and best practices: def get_data(url, retries=3): import requests import time for i in range(retries):…

Claude Opus 4.8

# Code Review Here's a breakdown of issues and suggested improvements for your function. ## Key Issues 1. **Imports inside the function** — should be at module level (runs on every call, harder to see dependencies). 2. **Bare `except:`** — catches everything, including `KeyboardInterrupt` and `SystemExit`. Silently swallowing errors makes debugging hard. 3. **Magic numbers** — `10`, `2`, `200` scattered around; extract as parameters/constants. 4. **`== True` comparison** — non-Pythonic; use the value directly (or `is True` if strict). 5. **Blocking `time.sleep(2)`** — fixed delay; exponential backoff is a better practice. 6. **`r.status_code == 200`** — misses other success codes; use `ra…
16.9s1403 output tokens

MiMo-V2.5-Pro

# Code Review: `get_data` Function ## Issues Identified ``` ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ ISSUE SEVERITY MAP │ ├──────────────────┬────────────┬──────────────────────────────┤ │ Issue │ Severity │ Category │ ├──────────────────┼────────────┼──────────────────────────────┤ │ Bare except │ 🔴 High │ Error Handling / Best Prac. │ │ Silent failures │ 🔴 High │ Debuggability │ │ == True check │ 🟡 Medium │ Readability / PEP 8 │ │ Inline imports │ 🟡 Medium │ Best Practice │ │ No type hints │ 🟡 Medium │ Best Practice…
10.4s1572 output tokens

Compare on more prompts →

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.8 or MiMo-V2.5-Pro?
Per 1M output tokens, Claude Opus 4.8 is ¥4,467.5 and MiMo-V2.5-Pro is ¥155.47 on FastMetal (yen, before tax), so MiMo-V2.5-Pro is cheaper.
How do the context windows of Claude Opus 4.8 and MiMo-V2.5-Pro compare?
Claude Opus 4.8 takes 1,000,000 tokens; MiMo-V2.5-Pro takes 1,050,000.
Which ranks higher, Claude Opus 4.8 or MiMo-V2.5-Pro?
Claude Opus 4.8 ranks higher on the public arena (Claude Opus 4.8 #26, MiMo-V2.5-Pro #44). Ranks move as the leaderboard updates.
Can I use Claude Opus 4.8 and MiMo-V2.5-Pro with the same API key?
Yes. On FastMetal's OpenAI-compatible endpoint, switch by passing "anthropic-claude-opus-4-8" or "mimo-v2.5-pro" as the model. Each is billed at its own rate from the same prepaid balance.

Try both on one API key

Create an account and add credit to call Claude Opus 4.8 and MiMo-V2.5-Pro from the browser chat and the API. No monthly fee.

More comparisons with Claude Opus 4.8

More comparisons with MiMo-V2.5-Pro