Model comparison

Claude Opus 5 vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro

Pricing, context window and real answers (August 2026)

Claude Opus 5 (Anthropic) and MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Xiaomi), compared as you can actually call them on FastMetal. Both are served from the same OpenAI-compatible endpoint and API key; switching is a change to the model string.

Specs and pricing

anthropic logoClaude Opus 5MiMo-V2.5-Pro
ProviderAnthropicXiaomi
Input (per 1M tokens)¥893.5¥77.73
Output (per 1M tokens)¥4,467.5¥155.47
Typical cost (1,000 in + 500 out tokens × 1,000 calls)¥3,127¥155
Context window1,000,000 tokens1,050,000 tokens
Release date7/24/20264/22/2026
Input modalitiestext, image, filetext
Arena · overall#5 · ELO 1,495#38 · ELO 1,465
Arena · JapaneseUnranked#44 · ELO 1,422
Arena · coding#7 · ELO 1,535#26 · ELO 1,519

Prices are FastMetal's yen rates before tax. Arena ranks are as of the latest leaderboard scrape.

Which should you pick?

  • On price, MiMo-V2.5-Pro: ¥155.47 per 1M output tokens, 97% less than Claude Opus 5.
  • On the Overall arena board, Claude Opus 5 ranks higher (#5; MiMo-V2.5-Pro is #38).
  • On the Coding arena board, Claude Opus 5 ranks higher (#7; MiMo-V2.5-Pro is #26).
  • For long documents, MiMo-V2.5-Pro: a 1,050,000-token context window against 1,000,000 for Claude Opus 5.
  • If in doubt, try both on the same key. Switching is a change to the model string, and each is billed at its own rate.

Real answers to the same prompts

Exactly what the FastMetal gateway returned, side by side. Not benchmark scores: actual output.

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'. Explain your reasoning step by step.

Claude Opus 5

## Counting the 'r's in "strawberry" **Step 1: Break the word into individual letters** | Position | Letter | |----------|--------| | 1 | s | | 2 | t | | 3 | **r** | | 4 | a | | 5 | w | | 6 | b | | 7 | e | | 8 | **r** | | 9 | **r** | | 10 | y | **Step 2: Identify each occurrence of 'r'** - Position 3: the 'r' in the "str-" beginning - Position 8: the first 'r' in the "-rry" ending - Position 9: the second 'r' in the "-rry" ending **Step 3: Tally them up** 3 + 8 + 9 → that's **3 occurrences**. ## Answer: 3 The tricky part is that "strawberry" contains a *double* 'r' near the end ("berry"), which is easy to skim over as a single letter. Splitting the word into "straw" (1 'r') + "berry"…
7.1s466 output tokens

MiMo-V2.5-Pro

## Counting the r's in "strawberry" Let me go through each letter one by one: | Position | Letter | Is it 'r'? | |----------|--------|------------| | 1 | s | No | | 2 | t | No | | 3 | **r** | ✅ Yes (#1) | | 4 | a | No | | 5 | w | No | | 6 | b | No | | 7 | e | No | | 8 | **r** | ✅ Yes (#2) | | 9 | **r** | ✅ Yes (#3) | | 10 | y | No | **There are 3 r's in "strawberry."** The word breaks down as **straw·ber·ry**, and the r's appear at the end of "staw" and then twice in the double-r of "rry."
8.3s313 output tokens

Debug This Error

I'm getting the following error in my Node.js application: TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map') at UserList (/app/components/UserList.js:12:25) at renderWithHooks (/app/node_modules/rea…

Claude Opus 5

## What's happening The error means `users` is `undefined` when `UserList` renders — so calling `.map()` on it throws. React isn't the problem; the prop simply isn't there yet (or ever). The three most common causes: 1. **The parent isn't passing the prop** (or passes it under a different name / typo): ```jsx <UserList /> // users is undefined <UserList user={data} /> // wrong name ``` 2. **The data is fetched asynchronously**, and the first render happens before it arrives: ```jsx const [users, setUsers] = useState(); // undefined on first render! useEffect(() => { fetch('/api/users').then(r => r.json()).then(setUsers); }, []); return <UserList user…
15.1s1191 output tokens

MiMo-V2.5-Pro

# Fixing `Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map')` ## The Problem The error means `users` is `undefined` when the component first renders. This typically happens when: 1. **The parent component hasn't passed the `users` prop** 2. **The data is being fetched asynchronously and isn't available yet** 3. **The prop name is misspelled in the parent** For example, the parent might be rendering it like this: ```jsx // ❌ No users prop passed — `users` will be undefined <UserList /> ``` ## Solutions ### 1. Add a Default Prop Value (Simple Fix) ```jsx function UserList({ users = [] }) { return ( <ul> {users.map(user => <li key={user.id}>{user.name}</li>)} </ul> ); }…
14.4s680 output tokens

Code Review

Please review the following Python function and suggest improvements for readability, performance, and best practices: def get_data(url, retries=3): import requests import time for i in range(retries):…

Claude Opus 5

# Code Review: `get_data` Overall, the function works for the happy path, but there are several issues worth addressing — the most serious being the bare `except`, the silent failure mode, and the conflation of two responsibilities (fetching and transforming). ## Critical Issues ### 1. Bare `except` swallows everything ```python except: time.sleep(2) ``` This catches `KeyboardInterrupt`, `SystemExit`, `MemoryError`, and — importantly — bugs in your own code. If `item["active"]` raises a `KeyError` because the API changed its schema, you'll retry three times and return `[]`, giving you no indication anything went wrong. Catch `requests.RequestException` instead (the base class for all…
34.7s2823 output tokens

MiMo-V2.5-Pro

# Code Review: `get_data` Function ## Issues Identified ``` ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ ISSUE SEVERITY MAP │ ├──────────────────┬────────────┬──────────────────────────────┤ │ Issue │ Severity │ Category │ ├──────────────────┼────────────┼──────────────────────────────┤ │ Bare except │ 🔴 High │ Error Handling / Best Prac. │ │ Silent failures │ 🔴 High │ Debuggability │ │ == True check │ 🟡 Medium │ Readability / PEP 8 │ │ Inline imports │ 🟡 Medium │ Best Practice │ │ No type hints │ 🟡 Medium │ Best Practice…
10.4s1572 output tokens

Compare on more prompts →

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 5 or MiMo-V2.5-Pro?
Per 1M output tokens, Claude Opus 5 is ¥4,467.5 and MiMo-V2.5-Pro is ¥155.47 on FastMetal (yen, before tax), so MiMo-V2.5-Pro is cheaper.
How do the context windows of Claude Opus 5 and MiMo-V2.5-Pro compare?
Claude Opus 5 takes 1,000,000 tokens; MiMo-V2.5-Pro takes 1,050,000.
Which ranks higher, Claude Opus 5 or MiMo-V2.5-Pro?
Claude Opus 5 ranks higher on the public arena (Claude Opus 5 #5, MiMo-V2.5-Pro #44). Ranks move as the leaderboard updates.
Can I use Claude Opus 5 and MiMo-V2.5-Pro with the same API key?
Yes. On FastMetal's OpenAI-compatible endpoint, switch by passing "anthropic-claude-opus-5" or "mimo-v2.5-pro" as the model. Each is billed at its own rate from the same prepaid balance.

Try both on one API key

Create an account and add credit to call Claude Opus 5 and MiMo-V2.5-Pro from the browser chat and the API. No monthly fee.

More comparisons with Claude Opus 5

More comparisons with MiMo-V2.5-Pro