LLM-jp-3.1 8x13B instruct4 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
Pricing, context window and real answers (August 2026)
LLM-jp-3.1 8x13B instruct4 (Llm Jp) and Muse Glimmer 30B (Meta), compared as you can actually call them on FastMetal. Both are served from the same OpenAI-compatible endpoint and API key; switching is a change to the model string.
Specs and pricing
| LLM-jp-3.1 8x13B instruct4 |  Muse Glimmer 30B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Llm Jp | Meta |
| Input (per 1M tokens) | ¥16 | ¥62.55 |
| Output (per 1M tokens) | ¥79 | ¥268.05 |
| Typical cost (1,000 in + 500 out tokens × 1,000 calls) | ¥56 | ¥197 |
| Context window | 4,096 tokens | 131,072 tokens |
| Release date | 3/21/2026 | 8/10/2026 |
| Input modalities | text | text, image |
| Arena · overall | Unranked | Unranked |
| Arena · Japanese | Unranked | Unranked |
| Arena · coding | Unranked | Unranked |
Prices are FastMetal's yen rates before tax. Arena ranks are as of the latest leaderboard scrape.
Which should you pick?
- On price, LLM-jp-3.1 8x13B instruct4: ¥79 per 1M output tokens, 71% less than Muse Glimmer 30B.
- For long documents, Muse Glimmer 30B: a 131,072-token context window against 4,096 for LLM-jp-3.1 8x13B instruct4.
- If in doubt, try both on the same key. Switching is a change to the model string, and each is billed at its own rate.
Real answers to the same prompts
Exactly what the FastMetal gateway returned, side by side. Not benchmark scores: actual output.
Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'
Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'. Explain your reasoning step by step.
LLM-jp-3.1 8x13B instruct4
To count the number of 'r's in the word 'strawberry', follow these steps:
1. Identify the word: The word we are examining is 'strawberry'.
2. Understand the task: We need to find and count all occurrences of the letter 'r' in this word.
3. Begin with the first letter: The first letter is 's', which is not 'r', so we move on to the next letter.
4. Proceed to the second letter: The second letter is 't', which is also not 'r', so we continue to the third letter.
5. Reach the third letter: The third letter is 'r'. We have found one 'r'.
6. Continue to the fourth letter: The fourth letter is 'a', which is not 'r', so we move on to the fifth letter.
7. Examine the fifth letter: The fifth letter i…
4.0s400 output tokens
Muse Glimmer 30B
The word is 10 letters long. Scanning left to right:
1. **s** - not r
2. **t** - not r
3. **r** - 1st r
4. **a** - not r
5. **w** - not r
6. **b** - not r
7. **e** - not r
8. **r** - 2nd r
9. **r** - 3rd r
10. **y** - not r
`s t r a w b e r r y`
There is one r in `str-`, and a double `rr` in `-berry`.
Total = 1 + 2 = 3 r's.
8.0s614 output tokens
Debug This Error
I'm getting the following error in my Node.js application: TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map') at UserList (/app/components/UserList.js:12:25) at renderWithHooks (/app/node_modules/rea…
LLM-jp-3.1 8x13B instruct4
The error TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map') suggests that the 'users' argument passed to the UserList component is undefined or does not have a 'map' method.
The cause of the problem may be that the users variable is not being passed correctly or is not defined in the parent component. Check the props being passed to the UserList component to ensure that they are defined and contain the expected data.
To fix the issue, you can add some error handling and debugging to your component. Try logging the users variable to the console to verify that it is not undefined:
```jsx
function UserList({ users }) {
console.log("Users:", users);
if (!users) {
return <…
3.0s279 output tokens
Muse Glimmer 30B
The error is exactly what it says: you're trying to call `.map` on `users`, but `users` is `undefined` at render time.
```js
{users.map(user => ...)}
^^^^^^
```
`Cannot read properties of undefined [reading 'map']` means `users` was never defined / passed in, so `users.map` throws.
This happens very commonly with React components that receive async data. The parent renders `UserList` before the data has loaded, so the prop is `undefined` / `null` on the first render.
### Fix it by guarding the prop
**1. Default parameter to an empty array - simplest**
```js
function UserList({ users = [] }) {
return (
<ul>
{users.map(user => <li key={user.id}>{user.name}</li>)}
</ul>…
5.6s888 output tokens
Code Review
Please review the following Python function and suggest improvements for readability, performance, and best practices: def get_data(url, retries=3): import requests import time for i in range(retries):…
LLM-jp-3.1 8x13B instruct4
The provided Python function aims to get data from a URL using the requests library, filter out specific items based on their "active" field, and return the result. Here are some suggestions to improve readability, performance, and adherence to best practices:
1. Configure the linter (e.g., flake8 or pylint) to ensure code quality and enforce a consistent coding style.
2. Use type hints to improve readability and maintainability.
3. Use context managers (with statement) for handling requests:
4. Rewrite the function using a more functional programming style:
Here's the improved version of the function:
```python
import requests
import time
from typing import List, Dict, Any
def get_da…
3.9s406 output tokens
Muse Glimmer 30B
The function works but it mixes concerns and hides errors. Here are the main issues:
**Readability**
* Imports inside the function. `import requests` and `import time` should be at module level.
* Bare `except:` catches `KeyboardInterrupt`, `SystemExit` and masks bugs.
* Unused loop variable `i` and vague names `r`, `data`.
* No docstring / type hints, so the contract is unclear.
* `if item["active"] == True:` is redundant and will raise `KeyError` if the key is missing.
**Correctness / Best practices**
* `except:` should be `except requests.RequestException`. JSON parsing can also fail.
* Check `r.status_code == 200` is too narrow. Use `raise_for_status` / `r.ok` for any 2xx.
* Fixed 2 se…
12.0s1795 output tokens
Frequently asked questions
- Which is cheaper, LLM-jp-3.1 8x13B instruct4 or Muse Glimmer 30B?
- Per 1M output tokens, LLM-jp-3.1 8x13B instruct4 is ¥79 and Muse Glimmer 30B is ¥268.05 on FastMetal (yen, before tax), so LLM-jp-3.1 8x13B instruct4 is cheaper.
- How do the context windows of LLM-jp-3.1 8x13B instruct4 and Muse Glimmer 30B compare?
- LLM-jp-3.1 8x13B instruct4 takes 4,096 tokens; Muse Glimmer 30B takes 131,072.
- Can I use LLM-jp-3.1 8x13B instruct4 and Muse Glimmer 30B with the same API key?
- Yes. On FastMetal's OpenAI-compatible endpoint, switch by passing "llm-jp-3.1-8x13b-instruct4" or "muse-glimmer-30b" as the model. Each is billed at its own rate from the same prepaid balance.
Try both on one API key
Create an account and add credit to call LLM-jp-3.1 8x13B instruct4 and Muse Glimmer 30B from the browser chat and the API. No monthly fee.