Model comparison

Kimi K3 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro

Pricing, context window and real answers (September 2026)

Kimi K3 (Moonshot) and MiMo-V2.6-Pro (Xiaomi), compared as you can actually call them on FastMetal. Both are served from the same OpenAI-compatible endpoint and API key; switching is a change to the model string.

Specs and pricing

moonshotai logoKimi K3MiMo-V2.6-Pro
ProviderMoonshotXiaomi
Input (per 1M tokens)¥504¥77.73
Output (per 1M tokens)¥2,520¥155.47
Typical cost (1,000 in + 500 out tokens × 1,000 calls)¥1,764¥155
Context window1,048,576 tokens1,048,576 tokens
Release date7/16/20269/21/2026
Input modalitiestext, imagetext, image, video, audio
Throughput (p50)
Arena · overall#17 · ELO 1,485Unranked
Arena · Japanese#2 · ELO 1,511Unranked
Arena · coding#7 · ELO 1,538Unranked

Prices are FastMetal's yen rates before tax. Arena ranks are as of the latest leaderboard scrape.

Which should you pick?

  • On price, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: ¥155.47 per 1M output tokens, 94% less than Kimi K3.
  • If in doubt, try both on the same key. Switching is a change to the model string, and each is billed at its own rate.

Real answers to the same prompts

Exactly what the FastMetal gateway returned, side by side. Not benchmark scores: actual output.

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'. Explain your reasoning step by step.

Kimi K3

# Counting the 'r's in "strawberry" **Step 1: Write out each letter with its position** | Position | Letter | |----------|--------| | 1 | s | | 2 | t | | 3 | **r** ✓ | | 4 | a | | 5 | w | | 6 | b | | 7 | e | | 8 | **r** ✓ | | 9 | **r** ✓ | | 10 | y | **Step 2: Identify each 'r'** - Position 3: the 'r' in "st**r**" - Position 8: the first 'r' in "be**r**ry" - Position 9: the second 'r' in "ber**r**y" **Step 3: Verify by splitting the word** "Strawberry" = "straw" + "berry" - "straw" contains **1** r - "berry" contains **2** r's **Answer: There are 3 r's in "strawberry."** 🍓
12.2s594 output tokens

MiMo-V2.6-Pro

# Counting the 'r's in "strawberry" ## Step 1: Spell out the word letter by letter | Position | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | |----------|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|----| | Letter | s | t | r | a | w | b | e | r | r | y | ## Step 2: Identify every 'r' - **Position 3** → **r** ✅ (1st 'r') - **Position 8** → **r** ✅ (2nd 'r') - **Position 9** → **r** ✅ (3rd 'r') All other letters (s, t, a, w, b, e, y) are not 'r'. ## Answer There are **3** 'r's in "strawberry."
22.0s327 output tokens

Debug This Error

I'm getting the following error in my Node.js application: TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map') at UserList (/app/components/UserList.js:12:25) at renderWithHooks (/app/node_modules/rea…

Kimi K3

## What's causing it The error means `users` is `undefined` when the component renders — `.map()` only exists on arrays, so calling it on `undefined` throws. Your component code is fine; the problem is **upstream**: whatever renders `<UserList />` isn't passing a valid array. The most common culprit is **async data fetching with uninitialized state** in the parent: ```jsx function App() { const [users, setUsers] = useState(); // ← undefined! useEffect(() => { fetch('/api/users') .then(res => res.json()) .then(setUsers); }, []); return <UserList users={users} />; // undefined on first render } ``` The component renders *before* the fetch resolves, so `users` is `…
47.5s1756 output tokens

MiMo-V2.6-Pro

# Fixing `Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map')` ## The Problem The `users` prop is `undefined` when the component renders. This happens because `.map()` is being called on something that doesn't exist — JavaScript can't iterate over `undefined`. This typically occurs when: - The parent component doesn't pass the `users` prop at all - The data is still loading (e.g., from an API call) - A destructuring default doesn't exist ## The Fix ### Option 1: Provide a default value (simplest) ```jsx function UserList({ users = [] }) { return ( <ul> {users.map(user => <li key={user.id}>{user.name}</li>)} </ul> ); } ``` ### Option 2: Add a safety check with conditi…
32.9s575 output tokens

Code Review

Please review the following Python function and suggest improvements for readability, performance, and best practices: def get_data(url, retries=3): import requests import time for i in range(retries):…

Kimi K3

This works, but there are several issues worth addressing. Here's a breakdown, followed by an improved version. ## Issues ### Correctness & best practices 1. **Bare `except:`** — catches *everything*, including `KeyboardInterrupt` and programming bugs like `KeyError` on a malformed item (which then get pointlessly retried). Catch `requests.RequestException` specifically. 2. **Silent failures** — errors are swallowed with no logging, and returning `[]` makes "API is down" indistinguishable from "no active items." At minimum, log; ideally, raise after the final attempt. 3. **Retrying non-retryable errors** — a 400/401/404 will never succeed on retry, but the code sleeps and retries anyway. O…
57.6s8060 output tokens

MiMo-V2.6-Pro

# Code Review: `get_data` Function ## Issues Identified Here's my review organized by category, with a final improved version at the end. --- ### 🔴 Best Practices 1. **Imports inside the function** — `import requests` and `import time` are executed on *every* call. Move them to the top of the file (module-level). 2. **Bare `except:`** — This catches *everything*, including `KeyboardInterrupt` and `SystemExit`. Always catch specific exceptions. 3. **`== True` comparison** — Verbose and unnecessary. Use the object's truthiness directly. 4. **No logging** — Silent failures make debugging nearly impossible. 5. **Magic numbers** — `timeout=10` and `time.sleep(2)` are unexplained constan…
42.5s983 output tokens

Compare on more prompts →

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Kimi K3 or MiMo-V2.6-Pro?
Per 1M output tokens, Kimi K3 is ¥2,520 and MiMo-V2.6-Pro is ¥155.47 on FastMetal (yen, before tax), so MiMo-V2.6-Pro is cheaper.
How do the context windows of Kimi K3 and MiMo-V2.6-Pro compare?
Kimi K3 takes 1,048,576 tokens; MiMo-V2.6-Pro takes 1,048,576.
Can I use Kimi K3 and MiMo-V2.6-Pro with the same API key?
Yes. On FastMetal's OpenAI-compatible endpoint, switch by passing "kimi-k3" or "mimo-v2.6-pro" as the model. Each is billed at its own rate from the same prepaid balance.

Try both on one API key

Create an account and add credit to call Kimi K3 and MiMo-V2.6-Pro from the browser chat and the API. No monthly fee.

More comparisons with Kimi K3

More comparisons with MiMo-V2.6-Pro