Model comparison

Grok 4.7 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro

Pricing, context window and real answers (November 2026)

Grok 4.7 (xAI) and MiMo-V2.6-Pro (Xiaomi), compared as you can actually call them on FastMetal. Both are served from the same OpenAI-compatible endpoint and API key; switching is a change to the model string.

Specs and pricing

x-ai logoGrok 4.7MiMo-V2.6-Pro
ProviderxAIXiaomi
Input (per 1M tokens)$2.20$0.459
Output (per 1M tokens)$6.60$0.9179
Typical cost (1,000 in + 500 out tokens × 1,000 calls)$5.50$0.9179
Context window500,000 tokens1,048,576 tokens
Release date9/21/20269/21/2026
Input modalitiestext, image, filetext, image, video, audio
Throughput (p50)201 tokens/s (n=28)126 tokens/s (n=28)
Arena · overall#96 · ELO 1,441#29 · ELO 1,480
Arena · Japanese#88 · ELO 1,408Unranked
Arena · coding#91 · ELO 1,494#14 · ELO 1,538

Prices are FastMetal's rates, before tax.

Rankings: LMArena leaderboard dataset (lmarena-ai/leaderboard-dataset), CC BY 4.0, snapshot 2026-10-28; category names mapped and ratings rounded by FastMetal.

Which should you pick?

  • On price, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: $0.9179 per 1M output tokens, 86% less than Grok 4.7.
  • On the Overall arena board, MiMo-V2.6-Pro ranks higher (#29; Grok 4.7 is #96).
  • On the Coding arena board, MiMo-V2.6-Pro ranks higher (#14; Grok 4.7 is #91).
  • For long documents, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: a 1,048,576-token context window against 500,000 for Grok 4.7.
  • If in doubt, try both on the same key. Switching is a change to the model string, and each is billed at its own rate.

Real answers to the same prompts

Exactly what the FastMetal gateway returned, side by side. Not benchmark scores: actual output.

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'. Explain your reasoning step by step.

Grok 4.7

The word "strawberry" consists of the letters S-T-R-A-W-B-E-R-R-Y. - The 3rd letter is R. - The 8th letter is R. - The 9th letter is R. This gives a total of 3 R's.
4.7s299 output tokens

MiMo-V2.6-Pro

# Counting the 'r's in "strawberry" ## Step 1: Spell out the word letter by letter | Position | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | |----------|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|----| | Letter | s | t | r | a | w | b | e | r | r | y | ## Step 2: Identify every 'r' - **Position 3** → **r** ✅ (1st 'r') - **Position 8** → **r** ✅ (2nd 'r') - **Position 9** → **r** ✅ (3rd 'r') All other letters (s, t, a, w, b, e, y) are not 'r'. ## Answer There are **3** 'r's in "strawberry."
22.0s327 output tokens

Debug This Error

I'm getting the following error in my Node.js application: TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map') at UserList (/app/components/UserList.js:12:25) at renderWithHooks (/app/node_modules/rea…

Grok 4.7

The error happens because `users` is `undefined` when `UserList` renders, so calling `.map` on it fails. That usually means the parent rendered `<UserList />` (or `<UserList users={undefined} />`) before data was loaded, or the prop name doesn’t match. **Fix it in the component** so it tolerates a missing list: ```jsx function UserList({ users = [] }) { return ( <ul> {users.map(user => <li key={user.id}>{user.name}</li>)} </ul> ); } ``` Or guard the call: ```jsx function UserList({ users }) { return ( <ul> {(users ?? []).map(user => <li key={user.id}>{user.name}</li>)} </ul> ); } ``` **Also check the parent** so you pass an array once data exists: `…
12.8s393 output tokens

MiMo-V2.6-Pro

# Fixing `Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map')` ## The Problem The `users` prop is `undefined` when the component renders. This happens because `.map()` is being called on something that doesn't exist — JavaScript can't iterate over `undefined`. This typically occurs when: - The parent component doesn't pass the `users` prop at all - The data is still loading (e.g., from an API call) - A destructuring default doesn't exist ## The Fix ### Option 1: Provide a default value (simplest) ```jsx function UserList({ users = [] }) { return ( <ul> {users.map(user => <li key={user.id}>{user.name}</li>)} </ul> ); } ``` ### Option 2: Add a safety check with conditi…
32.9s575 output tokens

Code Review

Please review the following Python function and suggest improvements for readability, performance, and best practices: def get_data(url, retries=3): import requests import time for i in range(retries):…

Grok 4.7

## Review The function works for the happy path, but it hides failures, retries the wrong errors, and is harder to read and debug than it needs to be. ### Issues 1. **Imports inside the function** — move them to module level unless you have a strong reason (circular imports, optional dependency). 2. **Bare `except`** — swallows `KeyboardInterrupt`, `SystemExit`, and programming bugs. Catch specific exceptions. 3. **Retries non-retryable failures** — 4xx (except maybe 429) will not succeed on retry. Network errors and 5xx are the usual candidates. 4. **Sleeps after the last attempt** — wastes up to 2 seconds before returning `[]`. 5. **Unused loop variable** and vague names (`r`, `i`). 6.…
22.3s1525 output tokens

MiMo-V2.6-Pro

# Code Review: `get_data` Function ## Issues Identified Here's my review organized by category, with a final improved version at the end. --- ### 🔴 Best Practices 1. **Imports inside the function** — `import requests` and `import time` are executed on *every* call. Move them to the top of the file (module-level). 2. **Bare `except:`** — This catches *everything*, including `KeyboardInterrupt` and `SystemExit`. Always catch specific exceptions. 3. **`== True` comparison** — Verbose and unnecessary. Use the object's truthiness directly. 4. **No logging** — Silent failures make debugging nearly impossible. 5. **Magic numbers** — `timeout=10` and `time.sleep(2)` are unexplained constan…
42.5s983 output tokens

Compare on more prompts →

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Grok 4.7 or MiMo-V2.6-Pro?
Per 1M output tokens, Grok 4.7 is $6.60 and MiMo-V2.6-Pro is $0.9179 on FastMetal (US dollars, before tax), so MiMo-V2.6-Pro is cheaper.
How do the context windows of Grok 4.7 and MiMo-V2.6-Pro compare?
Grok 4.7 takes 500,000 tokens; MiMo-V2.6-Pro takes 1,048,576.
Which ranks higher, Grok 4.7 or MiMo-V2.6-Pro?
MiMo-V2.6-Pro ranks higher on the public arena (Grok 4.7 #88, MiMo-V2.6-Pro #29). Ranks move as the leaderboard updates.
Can I use Grok 4.7 and MiMo-V2.6-Pro with the same API key?
Yes. On FastMetal's OpenAI-compatible endpoint, switch by passing "grok-4.7" or "mimo-v2.6-pro" as the model. Each is billed at its own rate from the same prepaid balance.

Try both on one API key

Create an account and add credit to call Grok 4.7 and MiMo-V2.6-Pro from the browser chat and the API. No monthly fee.

More comparisons with Grok 4.7

More comparisons with MiMo-V2.6-Pro