Model comparison

Grok 4.6 vs Kimi K3

Pricing, context window and real answers (August 2026)

Grok 4.6 (xAI) and Kimi K3 (Moonshot), compared as you can actually call them on FastMetal. Both are served from the same OpenAI-compatible endpoint and API key; switching is a change to the model string.

Specs and pricing

x-ai logoGrok 4.6moonshotai logoKimi K3
ProviderxAIMoonshot
Input (per 1M tokens)¥357.4¥536.1
Output (per 1M tokens)¥1,072.2¥2,680.5
Typical cost (1,000 in + 500 out tokens × 1,000 calls)¥894¥1,876
Context window500,000 tokens1,048,576 tokens
Release date8/12/20267/16/2026
Input modalitiestext, image, filetext, image
Arena · overallUnranked#11 · ELO 1,486
Arena · JapaneseUnrankedUnranked
Arena · codingUnranked#8 · ELO 1,530

Prices are FastMetal's yen rates before tax. Arena ranks are as of the latest leaderboard scrape.

Which should you pick?

  • On price, Grok 4.6: ¥1,072.2 per 1M output tokens, 60% less than Kimi K3.
  • For long documents, Kimi K3: a 1,048,576-token context window against 500,000 for Grok 4.6.
  • If in doubt, try both on the same key. Switching is a change to the model string, and each is billed at its own rate.

Real answers to the same prompts

Exactly what the FastMetal gateway returned, side by side. Not benchmark scores: actual output.

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'. Explain your reasoning step by step.

Grok 4.6

The word "strawberry" consists of the following letters in order: s-t-r-a-w-b-e-r-r-y Checking each one: - s: not r - t: not r - r: yes (count = 1) - a: not r - w: not r - b: not r - e: not r - r: yes (count = 2) - r: yes (count = 3) - y: not r There are exactly 3 r's. Final answer: 3
3.9s451 output tokens

Kimi K3

# Counting the 'r's in "strawberry" **Step 1: Write out each letter with its position** | Position | Letter | |----------|--------| | 1 | s | | 2 | t | | 3 | **r** ✓ | | 4 | a | | 5 | w | | 6 | b | | 7 | e | | 8 | **r** ✓ | | 9 | **r** ✓ | | 10 | y | **Step 2: Identify each 'r'** - Position 3: the 'r' in "st**r**" - Position 8: the first 'r' in "be**r**ry" - Position 9: the second 'r' in "ber**r**y" **Step 3: Verify by splitting the word** "Strawberry" = "straw" + "berry" - "straw" contains **1** r - "berry" contains **2** r's **Answer: There are 3 r's in "strawberry."** 🍓
12.2s594 output tokens

Debug This Error

I'm getting the following error in my Node.js application: TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map') at UserList (/app/components/UserList.js:12:25) at renderWithHooks (/app/node_modules/rea…

Grok 4.6

**The error happens because `users` is `undefined` when `.map()` is called.** `UserList` destructures `{ users }` from its props. If the parent doesn't pass a `users` prop (or passes `undefined`/`null`), `users` is `undefined` and `undefined.map` throws. This is extremely common when: - Data is loaded asynchronously (initial render happens before the fetch finishes). - The parent component forgets to pass the prop or uses a different name. - The component is rendered before the data is ready (e.g. in a loading state). ### Quick fixes **1. Default to an empty array (recommended)** ```jsx function UserList({ users = [] }) { return ( <ul> {users.map(user => ( <li key={us…
20.3s598 output tokens

Kimi K3

## What's causing it The error means `users` is `undefined` when the component renders — `.map()` only exists on arrays, so calling it on `undefined` throws. Your component code is fine; the problem is **upstream**: whatever renders `<UserList />` isn't passing a valid array. The most common culprit is **async data fetching with uninitialized state** in the parent: ```jsx function App() { const [users, setUsers] = useState(); // ← undefined! useEffect(() => { fetch('/api/users') .then(res => res.json()) .then(setUsers); }, []); return <UserList users={users} />; // undefined on first render } ``` The component renders *before* the fetch resolves, so `users` is `…
47.5s1756 output tokens

Code Review

Please review the following Python function and suggest improvements for readability, performance, and best practices: def get_data(url, retries=3): import requests import time for i in range(retries):…

Grok 4.6

Here is a focused review of the function, followed by a cleaned-up version. ## Issues **Imports inside the function** `requests` and `time` should live at module level. Importing on every call is slower, hides dependencies, and is harder to mock in tests. **Bare `except:`** This swallows `KeyboardInterrupt`, `SystemExit`, and programming errors. Catch `requests.RequestException` (network/timeout/HTTP adapter errors) and JSON/`KeyError`/`TypeError` separately. **Retrying the wrong things** A 404 or 400 will never succeed on retry. Retry transient failures (timeouts, connection errors, 429, 5xx). Fail fast on most 4xx responses. **Sleep after the last attempt** On the final failur…
27.9s1770 output tokens

Kimi K3

This works, but there are several issues worth addressing. Here's a breakdown, followed by an improved version. ## Issues ### Correctness & best practices 1. **Bare `except:`** — catches *everything*, including `KeyboardInterrupt` and programming bugs like `KeyError` on a malformed item (which then get pointlessly retried). Catch `requests.RequestException` specifically. 2. **Silent failures** — errors are swallowed with no logging, and returning `[]` makes "API is down" indistinguishable from "no active items." At minimum, log; ideally, raise after the final attempt. 3. **Retrying non-retryable errors** — a 400/401/404 will never succeed on retry, but the code sleeps and retries anyway. O…
57.6s8060 output tokens

Compare on more prompts →

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Grok 4.6 or Kimi K3?
Per 1M output tokens, Grok 4.6 is ¥1,072.2 and Kimi K3 is ¥2,680.5 on FastMetal (yen, before tax), so Grok 4.6 is cheaper.
How do the context windows of Grok 4.6 and Kimi K3 compare?
Grok 4.6 takes 500,000 tokens; Kimi K3 takes 1,048,576.
Can I use Grok 4.6 and Kimi K3 with the same API key?
Yes. On FastMetal's OpenAI-compatible endpoint, switch by passing "grok-4.6" or "kimi-k3" as the model. Each is billed at its own rate from the same prepaid balance.

Try both on one API key

Create an account and add credit to call Grok 4.6 and Kimi K3 from the browser chat and the API. No monthly fee.

More comparisons with Grok 4.6

More comparisons with Kimi K3