Claude Fable 5.1 vs Grok 4.6
Pricing, context window and real answers (September 2026)
Claude Fable 5.1 (Anthropic) and Grok 4.6 (xAI), compared as you can actually call them on FastMetal. Both are served from the same OpenAI-compatible endpoint and API key; switching is a change to the model string.
Specs and pricing
 Claude Fable 5.1 |  Grok 4.6 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | xAI |
| Input (per 1M tokens) | ¥1,787 | ¥357.4 |
| Output (per 1M tokens) | ¥8,935 | ¥1,072.2 |
| Typical cost (1,000 in + 500 out tokens × 1,000 calls) | ¥6,255 | ¥894 |
| Context window | 1,000,000 tokens | 500,000 tokens |
| Release date | 9/1/2026 | 8/12/2026 |
| Input modalities | text, image, file | text, image, file |
| Arena · overall | #3 · ELO 1,504 | #49 · ELO 1,461 |
| Arena · Japanese | Unranked | Unranked |
| Arena · coding | #34 · ELO 1,517 | #45 · ELO 1,511 |
Prices are FastMetal's yen rates before tax. Arena ranks are as of the latest leaderboard scrape.
Which should you pick?
- On price, Grok 4.6: ¥1,072.2 per 1M output tokens, 88% less than Claude Fable 5.1.
- On the Overall arena board, Claude Fable 5.1 ranks higher (#3; Grok 4.6 is #49).
- On the Coding arena board, Claude Fable 5.1 ranks higher (#34; Grok 4.6 is #45).
- For long documents, Claude Fable 5.1: a 1,000,000-token context window against 500,000 for Grok 4.6.
- If in doubt, try both on the same key. Switching is a change to the model string, and each is billed at its own rate.
Real answers to the same prompts
Exactly what the FastMetal gateway returned, side by side. Not benchmark scores: actual output.
Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'
Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'. Explain your reasoning step by step.
Claude Fable 5.1
**Step 1: Write out the word letter by letter.**
s - t - r - a - w - b - e - r - r - y
**Step 2: Number each position.**
1. s
2. t
3. **r**
4. a
5. w
6. b
7. e
8. **r**
9. **r**
10. y
**Step 3: Identify which positions contain 'r'.**
- Position 3: r (in "str-")
- Position 8: r (in "-ber-")
- Position 9: r (in "-rry")
**Step 4: Count them.**
3 + 1 + 1 = **3**
**Answer: There are 3 'r's in "strawberry."**
A helpful way to check: split the word into its parts — "straw" (1 r) + "berry" (2 r's) = 3 r's total.
7.9s259 output tokens
Grok 4.6
The word "strawberry" consists of the following letters in order:
s-t-r-a-w-b-e-r-r-y
Checking each one:
- s: not r
- t: not r
- r: yes (count = 1)
- a: not r
- w: not r
- b: not r
- e: not r
- r: yes (count = 2)
- r: yes (count = 3)
- y: not r
There are exactly 3 r's.
Final answer: 3
3.9s451 output tokens
Debug This Error
I'm getting the following error in my Node.js application: TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map') at UserList (/app/components/UserList.js:12:25) at renderWithHooks (/app/node_modules/rea…
Claude Fable 5.1
The error means that when `UserList` rendered, the `users` prop was `undefined`, so calling `.map()` on it failed. This typically happens because:
1. **The parent isn't passing the prop** (or misspelled it, e.g. `<UserList user={...} />`), or
2. **The data hasn't loaded yet.** A common pattern is fetching users in a `useEffect` and storing them in state whose initial value is `undefined` (e.g. `useState()`), so the first render happens before the data arrives.
**Fixes**
Give the prop a default value so the component is safe to render with no data:
```jsx
function UserList({ users = [] }) {
return (
<ul>
{users.map(user => <li key={user.id}>{user.name}</li>)}
</ul>
);
}…
10.8s564 output tokens
Grok 4.6
**The error happens because `users` is `undefined` when `.map()` is called.**
`UserList` destructures `{ users }` from its props. If the parent doesn't pass a `users` prop (or passes `undefined`/`null`), `users` is `undefined` and `undefined.map` throws.
This is extremely common when:
- Data is loaded asynchronously (initial render happens before the fetch finishes).
- The parent component forgets to pass the prop or uses a different name.
- The component is rendered before the data is ready (e.g. in a loading state).
### Quick fixes
**1. Default to an empty array (recommended)**
```jsx
function UserList({ users = [] }) {
return (
<ul>
{users.map(user => (
<li key={us…
20.3s598 output tokens
Code Review
Please review the following Python function and suggest improvements for readability, performance, and best practices: def get_data(url, retries=3): import requests import time for i in range(retries):…
Claude Fable 5.1
Here's a review of the function organized by category, followed by a refactored version.
## Issues
### Correctness / robustness
1. **Bare `except:`** — This catches *everything*, including `KeyboardInterrupt`, `SystemExit`, and bugs like `KeyError` from `item["active"]`. A malformed response would be silently retried three times and then swallowed. Catch `requests.RequestException` (and `ValueError` for bad JSON) specifically.
2. **Retrying non-retryable errors** — A 404 or 400 will never succeed on retry. Only retry on transient failures (timeouts, connection errors, 5xx, 429).
3. **Silent failure** — Returning `[]` after exhausting retries is indistinguishable from "the endpoint legitima…
27.7s2028 output tokens
Grok 4.6
Here is a focused review of the function, followed by a cleaned-up version.
## Issues
**Imports inside the function**
`requests` and `time` should live at module level. Importing on every call is slower, hides dependencies, and is harder to mock in tests.
**Bare `except:`**
This swallows `KeyboardInterrupt`, `SystemExit`, and programming errors. Catch `requests.RequestException` (network/timeout/HTTP adapter errors) and JSON/`KeyError`/`TypeError` separately.
**Retrying the wrong things**
A 404 or 400 will never succeed on retry. Retry transient failures (timeouts, connection errors, 429, 5xx). Fail fast on most 4xx responses.
**Sleep after the last attempt**
On the final failur…
27.9s1770 output tokens
Frequently asked questions
- Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5.1 or Grok 4.6?
- Per 1M output tokens, Claude Fable 5.1 is ¥8,935 and Grok 4.6 is ¥1,072.2 on FastMetal (yen, before tax), so Grok 4.6 is cheaper.
- How do the context windows of Claude Fable 5.1 and Grok 4.6 compare?
- Claude Fable 5.1 takes 1,000,000 tokens; Grok 4.6 takes 500,000.
- Which ranks higher, Claude Fable 5.1 or Grok 4.6?
- Claude Fable 5.1 ranks higher on the public arena (Claude Fable 5.1 #3, Grok 4.6 #49). Ranks move as the leaderboard updates.
- Can I use Claude Fable 5.1 and Grok 4.6 with the same API key?
- Yes. On FastMetal's OpenAI-compatible endpoint, switch by passing "anthropic-claude-fable-5-1" or "grok-4.6" as the model. Each is billed at its own rate from the same prepaid balance.
Try both on one API key
Create an account and add credit to call Claude Fable 5.1 and Grok 4.6 from the browser chat and the API. No monthly fee.