Model comparison

gpt-oss-20b vs Kimi K2.6

Pricing, context window and real answers (September 2026)

gpt-oss-20b (OpenAI) and Kimi K2.6 (Moonshot), compared as you can actually call them on FastMetal. Both are served from the same OpenAI-compatible endpoint and API key; switching is a change to the model string.

Specs and pricing

openai logogpt-oss-20bmoonshotai logoKimi K2.6
ProviderOpenAIMoonshot
Input (per 1M tokens)¥5.36¥159.6
Output (per 1M tokens)¥25.02¥672
Typical cost (1,000 in + 500 out tokens × 1,000 calls)¥18¥496
Context window131,072 tokens262,144 tokens
Release date8/5/20254/20/2026
Input modalitiestexttext, image
Throughput (p50)
Arena · overall#252 · ELO 1,317#52 · ELO 1,460
Arena · Japanese#179 · ELO 1,256#36 · ELO 1,443
Arena · coding#232 · ELO 1,369#39 · ELO 1,514

Prices are FastMetal's yen rates before tax. Arena ranks are as of the latest leaderboard scrape.

Which should you pick?

  • On price, gpt-oss-20b: ¥25.02 per 1M output tokens, 96% less than Kimi K2.6.
  • On the Overall arena board, Kimi K2.6 ranks higher (#52; gpt-oss-20b is #252).
  • On the Japanese arena board, Kimi K2.6 ranks higher (#36; gpt-oss-20b is #179).
  • On the Coding arena board, Kimi K2.6 ranks higher (#39; gpt-oss-20b is #232).
  • For long documents, Kimi K2.6: a 262,144-token context window against 131,072 for gpt-oss-20b.
  • If in doubt, try both on the same key. Switching is a change to the model string, and each is billed at its own rate.

Real answers to the same prompts

Exactly what the FastMetal gateway returned, side by side. Not benchmark scores: actual output.

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'. Explain your reasoning step by step.

gpt-oss-20b

**Count of ‘r’ in “strawberry”: 3** --- ### Step‑by‑step reasoning 1. **Write out the word in individual letters** ``` s t r a w b e r r y ``` 2. **Identify each ‘r’** - The first ‘r’: appears after the “t” → **r** - The second ‘r’: appears in the part “berry” → **r** - The third ‘r’: the next letter after that → **r** 3. **Verify there are no more letters left** The remaining letters are “b”, “e”, “y”, none of which are “r”. 4. **Count the identified ‘r’s** 1 (first) + 1 (second) + 1 (third) = **3** --- ### Quick recap - Word: **strawberry** - Letters containing “r”: positions 3, 8, and 9. - Total count: **3**.
11.6s371 output tokens

Kimi K2.6

Here is the step-by-step count: **Step 1:** Write out the word and number each letter. 1. s 2. t 3. **r** ← 1st 'r' 4. a 5. w 6. b 7. e 8. **r** ← 2nd 'r' 9. **r** ← 3rd 'r' 10. y **Step 2:** Identify the positions containing the letter 'r'. - The 3rd letter is **r** - The 8th letter is **r** - The 9th letter is **r** **Step 3:** Tally the total. There are **3** letter 'r's in "strawberry".
4.5s352 output tokens

Debug This Error

I'm getting the following error in my Node.js application: TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map') at UserList (/app/components/UserList.js:12:25) at renderWithHooks (/app/node_modules/rea…

gpt-oss-20b

### Why does the error happen? `users.map(...)` can only run when **`users` is an array**. The stack trace shows that the crash happens on line 12 of `UserList.js`, which is the exact spot where the code tries to call `.map`. The value that is being passed to `UserList` (or the initial value that the parent creates) is **`undefined`** (or it could be `null`/`{}`). When JavaScript tries to read `users.map`, it throws: ``` TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map') ``` Typical reasons for this are: 1. The parent component **didn’t pass the `users` prop** at all. 2. The parent passed it but the value was **`undefined` / `null`** because data hasn’t been loaded ye…
11.4s1303 output tokens

Kimi K2.6

The error occurs because `users` is `undefined` when your component renders. The `.map()` method only works on arrays, so calling it on `undefined` throws this error. This usually happens when: - The parent component hasn't finished fetching data yet - The `users` prop isn't being passed at all - The prop is misspelled in the parent component ## Quick Fix Set a **default value** for the `users` prop: ```jsx function UserList({ users = [] }) { return ( <ul> {users.map(user => <li key={user.id}>{user.name}</li>)} </ul> ); } ``` ## Alternative Fixes **Optional chaining** (renders nothing if undefined): ```jsx {users?.map(user => <li key={user.id}>{user.name}</li>)} ```…
71.8s864 output tokens

Code Review

Please review the following Python function and suggest improvements for readability, performance, and best practices: def get_data(url, retries=3): import requests import time for i in range(retries):…

gpt-oss-20b

Below is a quick “code‑review” style list that touches the three axes you asked for – **readability**, **performance**, and **best practices**. After the bullet‑list I’ll paste a refactored version that incorporates the most common fixes. --- ## 1. Readability | Issue | Why it hurts | Quick fix | |-------|--------------|-----------| | **Imports inside the function** | Every call recompiles the import tables and makes the module’s top‑level slower. | Move `import requests` and `import time` to the module’s global header. | | **Bare `except:`** | Catches *everything* (KeyboardInterrupt, SystemExit, MemoryError, etc.) and swallows useful tracebacks. | Catch only the expected network-relate…
24.6s2267 output tokens

Kimi K2.6

Here is a refactored version followed by a breakdown of the improvements. ### Refactored Function ```python import logging import time from typing import Any import requests logger = logging.getLogger(__name__) def fetch_active_items( url: str, *, retries: int = 3, timeout: float = 10.0, backoff: float = 2.0, ) -> list[dict[str, Any]]: """Fetch active items from an API endpoint with retry logic. Args: url: The API endpoint URL. retries: Number of retry attempts for transient failures. timeout: HTTP request timeout in seconds. backoff: Base delay in seconds between retries (linear backoff). Returns: A list of activ…
17.9s4061 output tokens

Compare on more prompts →

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, gpt-oss-20b or Kimi K2.6?
Per 1M output tokens, gpt-oss-20b is ¥25.02 and Kimi K2.6 is ¥672 on FastMetal (yen, before tax), so gpt-oss-20b is cheaper.
How do the context windows of gpt-oss-20b and Kimi K2.6 compare?
gpt-oss-20b takes 131,072 tokens; Kimi K2.6 takes 262,144.
Which ranks higher, gpt-oss-20b or Kimi K2.6?
Kimi K2.6 ranks higher on the public arena (gpt-oss-20b #179, Kimi K2.6 #36). Ranks move as the leaderboard updates.
Can I use gpt-oss-20b and Kimi K2.6 with the same API key?
Yes. On FastMetal's OpenAI-compatible endpoint, switch by passing "gpt-oss-20b" or "kimi-k2.6" as the model. Each is billed at its own rate from the same prepaid balance.

Try both on one API key

Create an account and add credit to call gpt-oss-20b and Kimi K2.6 from the browser chat and the API. No monthly fee.

More comparisons with gpt-oss-20b

More comparisons with Kimi K2.6