Model comparison

Claude Sonnet 5 vs gpt-oss-20b

Pricing, context window and real answers (September 2026)

Claude Sonnet 5 (Anthropic) and gpt-oss-20b (OpenAI), compared as you can actually call them on FastMetal. Both are served from the same OpenAI-compatible endpoint and API key; switching is a change to the model string.

Specs and pricing

anthropic logoClaude Sonnet 5openai logogpt-oss-20b
ProviderAnthropicOpenAI
Input (per 1M tokens)¥357.4¥5.36
Output (per 1M tokens)¥1,787¥25.02
Typical cost (1,000 in + 500 out tokens × 1,000 calls)¥1,251¥18
Context window1,000,000 tokens131,072 tokens
Release date6/30/20268/5/2025
Input modalitiestext, image, filetext
Throughput (p50)
Arena · overall#51 · ELO 1,461#252 · ELO 1,317
Arena · Japanese#30 · ELO 1,448#179 · ELO 1,256
Arena · coding#27 · ELO 1,520#232 · ELO 1,369

Prices are FastMetal's yen rates before tax. Arena ranks are as of the latest leaderboard scrape.

Which should you pick?

  • On price, gpt-oss-20b: ¥25.02 per 1M output tokens, 99% less than Claude Sonnet 5.
  • On the Overall arena board, Claude Sonnet 5 ranks higher (#51; gpt-oss-20b is #252).
  • On the Japanese arena board, Claude Sonnet 5 ranks higher (#30; gpt-oss-20b is #179).
  • On the Coding arena board, Claude Sonnet 5 ranks higher (#27; gpt-oss-20b is #232).
  • For long documents, Claude Sonnet 5: a 1,000,000-token context window against 131,072 for gpt-oss-20b.
  • If in doubt, try both on the same key. Switching is a change to the model string, and each is billed at its own rate.

Real answers to the same prompts

Exactly what the FastMetal gateway returned, side by side. Not benchmark scores: actual output.

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'. Explain your reasoning step by step.

Claude Sonnet 5

# Counting 'r's in "strawberry" **Step 1: Spell out the word letter by letter** s - t - r - a - w - b - e - r - r - y **Step 2: Number each letter position** | Position | Letter | |----------|--------| | 1 | s | | 2 | t | | 3 | **r** | | 4 | a | | 5 | w | | 6 | b | | 7 | e | | 8 | **r** | | 9 | **r** | | 10 | y | **Step 3: Identify and count the 'r's** - Position 3: **r** ✓ (1st r) - Position 8: **r** ✓ (2nd r) - Position 9: **r** ✓ (3rd r) **Answer: There are 3 r's in "strawberry"**
5.9s405 output tokens

gpt-oss-20b

**Count of ‘r’ in “strawberry”: 3** --- ### Step‑by‑step reasoning 1. **Write out the word in individual letters** ``` s t r a w b e r r y ``` 2. **Identify each ‘r’** - The first ‘r’: appears after the “t” → **r** - The second ‘r’: appears in the part “berry” → **r** - The third ‘r’: the next letter after that → **r** 3. **Verify there are no more letters left** The remaining letters are “b”, “e”, “y”, none of which are “r”. 4. **Count the identified ‘r’s** 1 (first) + 1 (second) + 1 (third) = **3** --- ### Quick recap - Word: **strawberry** - Letters containing “r”: positions 3, 8, and 9. - Total count: **3**.
11.6s371 output tokens

Debug This Error

I'm getting the following error in my Node.js application: TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map') at UserList (/app/components/UserList.js:12:25) at renderWithHooks (/app/node_modules/rea…

Claude Sonnet 5

# Root Cause The `UserList` component receives `users` as a prop, but at the time it's rendered, `users` is `undefined` — not an empty array, but literally missing. When your code tries to call `.map()` on `undefined`, JavaScript throws that `TypeError`. This typically happens when: - The parent component hasn't fetched the data yet (e.g., an API call is still in progress) - The prop name doesn't match what's being passed down (typo) - The data source (API/state) genuinely returns `undefined` in some case # Fixes **1. Add a default prop value (quick fix)** ```jsx function UserList({ users = [] }) { return ( <ul> {users.map(user => <li key={user.id}>{user.name}</li>)} </u…
8.8s750 output tokens

gpt-oss-20b

### Why does the error happen? `users.map(...)` can only run when **`users` is an array**. The stack trace shows that the crash happens on line 12 of `UserList.js`, which is the exact spot where the code tries to call `.map`. The value that is being passed to `UserList` (or the initial value that the parent creates) is **`undefined`** (or it could be `null`/`{}`). When JavaScript tries to read `users.map`, it throws: ``` TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map') ``` Typical reasons for this are: 1. The parent component **didn’t pass the `users` prop** at all. 2. The parent passed it but the value was **`undefined` / `null`** because data hasn’t been loaded ye…
11.4s1303 output tokens

Code Review

Please review the following Python function and suggest improvements for readability, performance, and best practices: def get_data(url, retries=3): import requests import time for i in range(retries):…

Claude Sonnet 5

## Review of `get_data` Function Here's an improved version followed by an explanation of the changes: ```python import logging import time from typing import Any import requests logger = logging.getLogger(__name__) def get_data( url: str, retries: int = 3, timeout: float = 10.0, backoff_factor: float = 2.0, ) -> list[dict[str, Any]]: """ Fetch active items from the given URL. Args: url: The endpoint to fetch data from. retries: Number of attempts before giving up. timeout: Request timeout in seconds. backoff_factor: Multiplier for exponential backoff between retries. Returns: A list of dicts with "name" and "id"…
14.0s1299 output tokens

gpt-oss-20b

Below is a quick “code‑review” style list that touches the three axes you asked for – **readability**, **performance**, and **best practices**. After the bullet‑list I’ll paste a refactored version that incorporates the most common fixes. --- ## 1. Readability | Issue | Why it hurts | Quick fix | |-------|--------------|-----------| | **Imports inside the function** | Every call recompiles the import tables and makes the module’s top‑level slower. | Move `import requests` and `import time` to the module’s global header. | | **Bare `except:`** | Catches *everything* (KeyboardInterrupt, SystemExit, MemoryError, etc.) and swallows useful tracebacks. | Catch only the expected network-relate…
24.6s2267 output tokens

Compare on more prompts →

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 5 or gpt-oss-20b?
Per 1M output tokens, Claude Sonnet 5 is ¥1,787 and gpt-oss-20b is ¥25.02 on FastMetal (yen, before tax), so gpt-oss-20b is cheaper.
How do the context windows of Claude Sonnet 5 and gpt-oss-20b compare?
Claude Sonnet 5 takes 1,000,000 tokens; gpt-oss-20b takes 131,072.
Which ranks higher, Claude Sonnet 5 or gpt-oss-20b?
Claude Sonnet 5 ranks higher on the public arena (Claude Sonnet 5 #30, gpt-oss-20b #179). Ranks move as the leaderboard updates.
Can I use Claude Sonnet 5 and gpt-oss-20b with the same API key?
Yes. On FastMetal's OpenAI-compatible endpoint, switch by passing "anthropic-claude-sonnet-5" or "gpt-oss-20b" as the model. Each is billed at its own rate from the same prepaid balance.

Try both on one API key

Create an account and add credit to call Claude Sonnet 5 and gpt-oss-20b from the browser chat and the API. No monthly fee.

More comparisons with Claude Sonnet 5

More comparisons with gpt-oss-20b