gpt-oss-120b vs Grok 4.5
Pricing, context window and real answers (August 2026)
gpt-oss-120b (OpenAI) and Grok 4.5 (xAI), compared as you can actually call them on FastMetal. Both are served from the same OpenAI-compatible endpoint and API key; switching is a change to the model string.
Specs and pricing
| Provider | OpenAI | xAI |
|---|---|---|
| Input (per 1M tokens) | ¥16 | ¥357.4 |
| Output (per 1M tokens) | ¥79 | ¥1,072.2 |
| Typical cost (1,000 in + 500 out tokens × 1,000 calls) | ¥56 | ¥894 |
| Context window | 131,072 tokens | 500,000 tokens |
| Release date | 8/5/2025 | 7/8/2026 |
| Input modalities | text | text, image, file |
| Arena · overall | #186 · ELO 1,352 | #35 · ELO 1,468 |
| Arena · Japanese | #123 · ELO 1,320 | Unranked |
| Arena · coding | #190 · ELO 1,390 | #28 · ELO 1,516 |
Prices are FastMetal's yen rates before tax. Arena ranks are as of the latest leaderboard scrape.
Which should you pick?
- On price, gpt-oss-120b: ¥79 per 1M output tokens, 93% less than Grok 4.5.
- On the Overall arena board, Grok 4.5 ranks higher (#35; gpt-oss-120b is #186).
- On the Coding arena board, Grok 4.5 ranks higher (#28; gpt-oss-120b is #190).
- For long documents, Grok 4.5: a 500,000-token context window against 131,072 for gpt-oss-120b.
- If in doubt, try both on the same key. Switching is a change to the model string, and each is billed at its own rate.
Real answers to the same prompts
Exactly what the FastMetal gateway returned, side by side. Not benchmark scores: actual output.
Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'
Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'. Explain your reasoning step by step.
gpt-oss-120b
Grok 4.5
Debug This Error
I'm getting the following error in my Node.js application: TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map') at UserList (/app/components/UserList.js:12:25) at renderWithHooks (/app/node_modules/rea…
gpt-oss-120b
Grok 4.5
Code Review
Please review the following Python function and suggest improvements for readability, performance, and best practices: def get_data(url, retries=3): import requests import time for i in range(retries):…
gpt-oss-120b
Grok 4.5
Frequently asked questions
- Which is cheaper, gpt-oss-120b or Grok 4.5?
- Per 1M output tokens, gpt-oss-120b is ¥79 and Grok 4.5 is ¥1,072.2 on FastMetal (yen, before tax), so gpt-oss-120b is cheaper.
- How do the context windows of gpt-oss-120b and Grok 4.5 compare?
- gpt-oss-120b takes 131,072 tokens; Grok 4.5 takes 500,000.
- Which ranks higher, gpt-oss-120b or Grok 4.5?
- Grok 4.5 ranks higher on the public arena (gpt-oss-120b #123, Grok 4.5 #35). Ranks move as the leaderboard updates.
- Can I use gpt-oss-120b and Grok 4.5 with the same API key?
- Yes. On FastMetal's OpenAI-compatible endpoint, switch by passing "gpt-oss-120b" or "grok-4.5" as the model. Each is billed at its own rate from the same prepaid balance.
Try both on one API key
Create an account and add credit to call gpt-oss-120b and Grok 4.5 from the browser chat and the API. No monthly fee.