Model comparison

Claude Fable 5.1 vs gpt-oss-120b

Pricing, context window and real answers (September 2026)

Claude Fable 5.1 (Anthropic) and gpt-oss-120b (OpenAI), compared as you can actually call them on FastMetal. Both are served from the same OpenAI-compatible endpoint and API key; switching is a change to the model string.

Specs and pricing

anthropic logoClaude Fable 5.1openai logogpt-oss-120b
ProviderAnthropicOpenAI
Input (per 1M tokens)¥1,787¥16
Output (per 1M tokens)¥8,935¥79
Typical cost (1,000 in + 500 out tokens × 1,000 calls)¥6,255¥56
Context window1,000,000 tokens131,072 tokens
Release date9/1/20268/5/2025
Input modalitiestext, image, filetext
Arena · overall#3 · ELO 1,504#200 · ELO 1,352
Arena · JapaneseUnranked#132 · ELO 1,328
Arena · coding#34 · ELO 1,517#206 · ELO 1,391

Prices are FastMetal's yen rates before tax. Arena ranks are as of the latest leaderboard scrape.

Which should you pick?

  • On price, gpt-oss-120b: ¥79 per 1M output tokens, 99% less than Claude Fable 5.1.
  • On the Overall arena board, Claude Fable 5.1 ranks higher (#3; gpt-oss-120b is #200).
  • On the Coding arena board, Claude Fable 5.1 ranks higher (#34; gpt-oss-120b is #206).
  • For long documents, Claude Fable 5.1: a 1,000,000-token context window against 131,072 for gpt-oss-120b.
  • If in doubt, try both on the same key. Switching is a change to the model string, and each is billed at its own rate.

Real answers to the same prompts

Exactly what the FastMetal gateway returned, side by side. Not benchmark scores: actual output.

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'. Explain your reasoning step by step.

Claude Fable 5.1

**Step 1: Write out the word letter by letter.** s - t - r - a - w - b - e - r - r - y **Step 2: Number each position.** 1. s 2. t 3. **r** 4. a 5. w 6. b 7. e 8. **r** 9. **r** 10. y **Step 3: Identify which positions contain 'r'.** - Position 3: r (in "str-") - Position 8: r (in "-ber-") - Position 9: r (in "-rry") **Step 4: Count them.** 3 + 1 + 1 = **3** **Answer: There are 3 'r's in "strawberry."** A helpful way to check: split the word into its parts — "straw" (1 r) + "berry" (2 r's) = 3 r's total.
7.9s259 output tokens

gpt-oss-120b

**Step‑by‑step count of the letter “r” in the word “strawberry”** 1. Write out the word with each letter in order, labeling its position: | Position | Letter | |----------|--------| | 1 | s | | 2 | t | | 3 | **r** | | 4 | a | | 5 | w | | 6 | b | | 7 | e | | 8 | **r** | | 9 | **r** | |10 | y | 2. Scan the list and mark every occurrence of the letter **r**. - Position 3 → r (first occurrence) - Position 8 → r (second occurrence) - Position 9 → r (third occurrence) 3. Count the marked entries: there are **3** marked positions. **Result:** The word “strawberry” contains **3** occurrences of the letter **r**…
1.7s332 output tokens

Debug This Error

I'm getting the following error in my Node.js application: TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map') at UserList (/app/components/UserList.js:12:25) at renderWithHooks (/app/node_modules/rea…

Claude Fable 5.1

The error means that when `UserList` rendered, the `users` prop was `undefined`, so calling `.map()` on it failed. This typically happens because: 1. **The parent isn't passing the prop** (or misspelled it, e.g. `<UserList user={...} />`), or 2. **The data hasn't loaded yet.** A common pattern is fetching users in a `useEffect` and storing them in state whose initial value is `undefined` (e.g. `useState()`), so the first render happens before the data arrives. **Fixes** Give the prop a default value so the component is safe to render with no data: ```jsx function UserList({ users = [] }) { return ( <ul> {users.map(user => <li key={user.id}>{user.name}</li>)} </ul> ); }…
10.8s564 output tokens

gpt-oss-120b

### Why the `map` can’t be called `Array.prototype.map` is a method that exists only on **arrays** (or array‑like objects). When you see ``` TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map') at UserList (...) ``` it means that the variable you think is an array – `users` in this case – is actually **`undefined`** (or `null`). React is trying to evaluate this line: ```jsx {users.map(user => <li key={user.id}>{user.name}</li>)} ``` and it crashes because you can’t read `.map` from `undefined`. --- ## Common reasons `users` ends up undefined | Reason | Typical scenario | How it shows up | |--------|------------------|-----------------| | **Prop not passed** | `<Use…
7.3s1610 output tokens

Code Review

Please review the following Python function and suggest improvements for readability, performance, and best practices: def get_data(url, retries=3): import requests import time for i in range(retries):…

Claude Fable 5.1

Here's a review of the function organized by category, followed by a refactored version. ## Issues ### Correctness / robustness 1. **Bare `except:`** — This catches *everything*, including `KeyboardInterrupt`, `SystemExit`, and bugs like `KeyError` from `item["active"]`. A malformed response would be silently retried three times and then swallowed. Catch `requests.RequestException` (and `ValueError` for bad JSON) specifically. 2. **Retrying non-retryable errors** — A 404 or 400 will never succeed on retry. Only retry on transient failures (timeouts, connection errors, 5xx, 429). 3. **Silent failure** — Returning `[]` after exhausting retries is indistinguishable from "the endpoint legitima…
27.7s2028 output tokens

gpt-oss-120b

Below is a **step‑by‑step review** of the original `get_data` implementation followed by a **refactored version** that addresses readability, performance, and modern Python best‑practice concerns. --- ## 1. What the original function does ```python def get_data(url, retries=3): import requests import time for i in range(retries): try: r = requests.get(url, timeout=10) if r.status_code == 200: data = r.json() result = [] for item in data: if item["active"] == True: result.append({"name": item["name"], "id": item["id"]}) return result…
14.4s3132 output tokens

Compare on more prompts →

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5.1 or gpt-oss-120b?
Per 1M output tokens, Claude Fable 5.1 is ¥8,935 and gpt-oss-120b is ¥79 on FastMetal (yen, before tax), so gpt-oss-120b is cheaper.
How do the context windows of Claude Fable 5.1 and gpt-oss-120b compare?
Claude Fable 5.1 takes 1,000,000 tokens; gpt-oss-120b takes 131,072.
Which ranks higher, Claude Fable 5.1 or gpt-oss-120b?
Claude Fable 5.1 ranks higher on the public arena (Claude Fable 5.1 #3, gpt-oss-120b #132). Ranks move as the leaderboard updates.
Can I use Claude Fable 5.1 and gpt-oss-120b with the same API key?
Yes. On FastMetal's OpenAI-compatible endpoint, switch by passing "anthropic-claude-fable-5-1" or "gpt-oss-120b" as the model. Each is billed at its own rate from the same prepaid balance.

Try both on one API key

Create an account and add credit to call Claude Fable 5.1 and gpt-oss-120b from the browser chat and the API. No monthly fee.

More comparisons with Claude Fable 5.1

More comparisons with gpt-oss-120b