Model comparison

GPT-6 Luna vs Grok 4.6

Pricing, context window and real answers (September 2026)

GPT-6 Luna (OpenAI) and Grok 4.6 (xAI), compared as you can actually call them on FastMetal. Both are served from the same OpenAI-compatible endpoint and API key; switching is a change to the model string.

Specs and pricing

openai logoGPT-6 Lunax-ai logoGrok 4.6
ProviderOpenAIxAI
Input (per 1M tokens)¥17.87¥357.4
Output (per 1M tokens)¥89.35¥1,072.2
Typical cost (1,000 in + 500 out tokens × 1,000 calls)¥63¥894
Context window1,050,000 tokens500,000 tokens
Release date9/22/20268/12/2026
Input modalitiesfile, image, texttext, image, file
Throughput (p50)
Arena · overallUnranked#63 · ELO 1,456
Arena · JapaneseUnranked#68 · ELO 1,412
Arena · codingUnranked#54 · ELO 1,506

Prices are FastMetal's yen rates before tax. Arena ranks are as of the latest leaderboard scrape.

Which should you pick?

  • On price, GPT-6 Luna: ¥89.35 per 1M output tokens, 92% less than Grok 4.6.
  • For long documents, GPT-6 Luna: a 1,050,000-token context window against 500,000 for Grok 4.6.
  • If in doubt, try both on the same key. Switching is a change to the model string, and each is billed at its own rate.

Real answers to the same prompts

Exactly what the FastMetal gateway returned, side by side. Not benchmark scores: actual output.

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'. Explain your reasoning step by step.

GPT-6 Luna

In **“strawberry”**, the letter **r** appears at positions 3, 8, and 9. So there are **3** “r”s.
2.7s94 output tokens

Grok 4.6

The word "strawberry" consists of the following letters in order: s-t-r-a-w-b-e-r-r-y Checking each one: - s: not r - t: not r - r: yes (count = 1) - a: not r - w: not r - b: not r - e: not r - r: yes (count = 2) - r: yes (count = 3) - y: not r There are exactly 3 r's. Final answer: 3
3.9s451 output tokens

Debug This Error

I'm getting the following error in my Node.js application: TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map') at UserList (/app/components/UserList.js:12:25) at renderWithHooks (/app/node_modules/rea…

GPT-6 Luna

`users` is `undefined` when `UserList` renders, so calling `users.map(...)` throws. This often happens because the parent didn’t pass the prop or because data hasn’t loaded yet. If an empty list is acceptable until the data arrives, provide a default: ```jsx function UserList({ users = [] }) { return ( <ul> {users.map(user => ( <li key={user.id}>{user.name}</li> ))} </ul> ); } ``` Also check that the parent passes `users`: ```jsx <UserList users={users} /> ``` If `users` is loaded asynchronously, initialize it as an array: ```jsx const [users, setUsers] = useState([]); ``` If `null` is also possible, normalize it before mapping, for example `(users ?? […
3.8s289 output tokens

Grok 4.6

**The error happens because `users` is `undefined` when `.map()` is called.** `UserList` destructures `{ users }` from its props. If the parent doesn't pass a `users` prop (or passes `undefined`/`null`), `users` is `undefined` and `undefined.map` throws. This is extremely common when: - Data is loaded asynchronously (initial render happens before the fetch finishes). - The parent component forgets to pass the prop or uses a different name. - The component is rendered before the data is ready (e.g. in a loading state). ### Quick fixes **1. Default to an empty array (recommended)** ```jsx function UserList({ users = [] }) { return ( <ul> {users.map(user => ( <li key={us…
20.3s598 output tokens

Code Review

Please review the following Python function and suggest improvements for readability, performance, and best practices: def get_data(url, retries=3): import requests import time for i in range(retries):…

GPT-6 Luna

Key improvements: - Move imports to module scope. - Catch `requests.RequestException` instead of using a bare `except`; the current handler can hide programming errors as well as network failures. - Call `raise_for_status()` so unsuccessful HTTP responses are handled explicitly. - Use a list comprehension instead of building the result manually. - Replace `item["active"] == True` with `item.get("active") is True` if the field is expected to be the Boolean `True`. - Add backoff between attempts. A fixed two-second delay can make retries slower than necessary. - Decide whether failures should raise an exception or return `[]`. Returning `[]` makes a failed request indistinguishable from a suc…
16.5s1713 output tokens

Grok 4.6

Here is a focused review of the function, followed by a cleaned-up version. ## Issues **Imports inside the function** `requests` and `time` should live at module level. Importing on every call is slower, hides dependencies, and is harder to mock in tests. **Bare `except:`** This swallows `KeyboardInterrupt`, `SystemExit`, and programming errors. Catch `requests.RequestException` (network/timeout/HTTP adapter errors) and JSON/`KeyError`/`TypeError` separately. **Retrying the wrong things** A 404 or 400 will never succeed on retry. Retry transient failures (timeouts, connection errors, 429, 5xx). Fail fast on most 4xx responses. **Sleep after the last attempt** On the final failur…
27.9s1770 output tokens

Compare on more prompts →

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, GPT-6 Luna or Grok 4.6?
Per 1M output tokens, GPT-6 Luna is ¥89.35 and Grok 4.6 is ¥1,072.2 on FastMetal (yen, before tax), so GPT-6 Luna is cheaper.
How do the context windows of GPT-6 Luna and Grok 4.6 compare?
GPT-6 Luna takes 1,050,000 tokens; Grok 4.6 takes 500,000.
Can I use GPT-6 Luna and Grok 4.6 with the same API key?
Yes. On FastMetal's OpenAI-compatible endpoint, switch by passing "gpt-6-luna" or "grok-4.6" as the model. Each is billed at its own rate from the same prepaid balance.

Try both on one API key

Create an account and add credit to call GPT-6 Luna and Grok 4.6 from the browser chat and the API. No monthly fee.

More comparisons with GPT-6 Luna

More comparisons with Grok 4.6